Yeah it is dangerous for the islamo-fascists to know the reality.
if u believe what u said about sharia then u r in very very dangerous situation, muslims can sin but to think that of the law of Allah, u must revisit ur eman, do u know about ta'zir , wich comes before hudud, do u know that cutting hands won't be applied on a hungry man who stole a piece of breed, u r not attacking "terrorists" here by calling sharia stone aged rabid inhuman, ... it is not the creation of Taliban or Al Qaeda .
the hudud to a house of treasures (sociaty) r like a protecting wall , having said that I might discuss the time of applying the hudud, for exemple in Pakistan, I think there is no treasure to be protected, so no wall must be built,but when a muslim ruler provides muslims with minimum life standars, then he has to protect that with a wall of hudud to TERRORIZE the sickhearted people.
a woman came to the prophet with a child in her belly from zina asking him to punish her, he told her to come back after she gives birth to the baby, then after she whean him, the ulama said that he wanned her to never comeback, but when she kept showing up, he ordered her to be stoned to death n he told the sahaba that he saw her in jannah.
sayiduna Omar RA stopped the work with hududs because of the starvasion .
from these exemples we conclude that the hudud r not targets in themelves but only means to protect greater things,
when Allah says to cut off the hands of the thief in the Quran, or to make rajm for adultery, he SWT over values the materiel proprieties n honor of the muslim individual, the muslim family n so the muslim community .
Hududs r not appliable for most muslim countries exept maybe GCC because there is no treasures, nothing to protect, n so we must apply sharia to create the treasure n then build the wall