A- If KSA poses a real threat to the Indian nation, your Gov't shouldn't have worked with us over the last 50 years, because if they do, by your logic, they might put the safety of their people in jeopardy, or it could mean that the Indian Gov't applies double standards.
KSA does not post a threat to the Indian nation per se.
What KSA does is spread its brand of Islam which produces terrorists not just in India or Pakistan, but globally.
And had zero influence over KSA till the 2000's, and even today, we have little. But its growing with time, as India's economy and military are growing.
B- King Fahad never stopped funding KSA's projects in the US, each and every single institution is being monitored by the Fedral Government, under title VI. Currently, KSA has 13 Arabian and Islamic cultural studies centers located in Universities across the US, aside from other charity and scientific research centers.
I am beginning to question your english skills mate.
I said USA stopped Fahd from funding of various organizations - Islamic charitable organizations. I didnt say cultural studies centers in US.
Actually, the OIC was founded in 1969 by KSA, and we have been funding it ever since.
And I wasnt talking of OIC, else I would have mentioned OIC.
I am speaking specifically of the Global Islamic Conference held in the 1980's and its participants.
You must have misunderstood my question, I was asking you about having a materialistic proof in which it indicated that KSA was involved in terror activities, I'm positively sure you will failed to provide any, don't worry, I can speak with the authority on that.
There is a plethora of evidence...over many decades.
Let me post something recent to jog your memory.
WikiLeaks cables portray Saudi Arabia as a cash machine for terrorists | World news | The Guardian
"More needs to be done since
Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaida, the Taliban, LeT and other terrorist groups," says a secret December 2009 paper
signed by the US secretary of state. Her memo urged US diplomats to redouble their efforts to stop Gulf money reaching extremists in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Now I'm beginning to question your English skills. You just told us that we created terror to consolidate the primarly power in Saudi Arabi, and then I confrontated you with a bit of an evidence to refute your argument, and now you're telling us that Al-Qaida doesn't support monarchies? Seriously??
Yes, it does not.
Al Qaida is useful till a certain extent. But just like Muslim Brotherhood, if they grow too powerful, they threaten the basis and legitimacy of monarchy in Saudi Arabia.
That is one of the prime reasons why KSA rushed to give money to Egypt as soon as its Army toppled MB.
Yes, KSA and Pakistan created the Taliban to counter post-Shah Iran and the flux of 12er Shiaism, as for Al-Qaida, the Arab Afghan - who later became known to be Al Qaida - didn't need a damn help, a guy like Bin laden with a net worth of a $20 billion or at least a part of it needs no help from a damn country or intelligence agency.
I will leave it here, I'm dropping the stick since the debate began to become more and more dulls.
Adios
I gave a simple example of a quote from the US Secretary of State.
As I said, there is a plethora of intelligence about this.
The only reason nothing is or can be done about it except for constantly pushing the Saud family is because KSA is the single most crucial supplier of oil to the globe and the most supportive of allies of US. They are indispensable.
Point taken, many nations are mad at us, for some reasons…
No one is mad. But the person whom you quote is a typical example of what comes out after being educated in wahabi madrassas.
Reasons are being given for activities undertaken by KSA.
KSA has also reduced a lot of its funding under US pressure after 9/11.
