What's new

Satellite imagery reveals mystery 'supergun' in Chinese desert

Unless the weapon is protected with other military assets and made to hits targets beyond the range of the opposition, which it is designed to do.

If you put it at a distance beyond Enemy, It will be an useless weapon. 
dude dont post such threats here u will give indians a heart attack.:rofl:


It is a fart attack to some other country and not heart attack to Indians. It will take a single stroke of Brahmos or Prahar to neutralize if such weapon exists at all..
 
Last edited:
Why would it be useless when it can hit the enemy beyond the range of the enemy's defenses?

Do you think that that the so called Gun has longer range than Missile?(So missile can not hit the gun but gun can hit enemy) By the way what do you think the range of Gun will be?
 
Do you think that that the so called Gun has longer range than Missile?(So missile can not hit the gun but gun can hit enemy) By the way what do you think the range of Gun will be?

Do you think that the gun won't be hidden and/or protected by layers of air defense systems? The so-called "missile threat" might exist in an ideal simulation but in real life you can be sure that there'll be countermeasures and appropriate ways to deal with this threat, not to mention that a 110-foot gun can easily shoot a projectile into suborbital altitudes which will outrange most regional missiles.
 
Do you think that the gun won't be hidden and/or protected by layers of air defense systems? The so-called "missile threat" might exist in an ideal simulation but in real life you can be sure that there'll be countermeasures and appropriate ways to deal with this threat, not to mention that a 110-foot gun can easily shoot a projectile into suborbital altitudes which will outrange most regional missiles.


One way hiding the the Gun from being shot and other way using it in battle field???!!!!

How effective is your so called Missile shield? Can it withstand against Brahmos or Shaurya or Prahar? Of course not.

Shooting in suborbital is your wet dream. I am not here to answer your wet dream. An it will outrange most regional missile? Which Logic? I think a man with Chinese Logic and Chinese educations only believe that.
 
One way hiding the the Gun from being shot and other way using it in battle field???!!!!

How effective is your so called Missile shield? Can it withstand against Brahmos or Shaurya or Prahar? Of course not.

Shooting in suborbital is your wet dream. I am not here to answer your wet dream. An it will outrange most regional missile? Which Logic? I think a man with Chinese Logic and Chinese educations only believe that.
Calm down dude.It is not a heart attack right? It's just a picture and you have your BrahMos. Plz dont relate it with our Chinese education .It's not reasonable.
 
Calm down dude.It is not a heart attack right? It's just a picture and you have your BrahMos. Plz dont relate it with our Chinese education .It's not reasonable.


Ok Man I will not relate it with Chinese Education.

It is a fart attack fight in which capability of a so called (Yes never claimed by Chinese armed forces) is hyped so much. Not a surprise, so many such exaggerated claims we have seen in past. Later of dubbing them Dude by Chinese media themselves.
 
The railgun will install on future warships, to replace current 76mm or 130mm gun. At the same moment American also developing Navy Railgun.
 
One way hiding the the Gun from being shot and other way using it in battle field???!!!!

How effective is your so called Missile shield? Can it withstand against Brahmos or Shaurya or Prahar? Of course not.

Shooting in suborbital is your wet dream. I am not here to answer your wet dream. An it will outrange most regional missile? Which Logic? I think a man with Chinese Logic and Chinese educations only believe that.

1. The gun can be hidden by simply using camouflage or hardened bunkers and it would still usable.

2. Other options would include putting the gun in a huge array of air defense equipment. No large military asset go to war unprotected these days.

3. Brahmos and Shaurya and Prahar can be intercepted by all sorts of air defense systems. That's what modern missiles are for and that's why the US are developing countermeasures to them.

4. There is no technical limitation to a weapon's ability to fire suborbital rounds, especially one that size.

5. Stop with the ad hominem and try to sound like a reasonable person. 
Ok Man I will not relate it with Chinese Education.

It is a fart attack fight in which capability of a so called (Yes never claimed by Chinese armed forces) is hyped so much. Not a surprise, so many such exaggerated claims we have seen in past. Later of dubbing them Dude by Chinese media themselves.

We were not even given any detailed description on its capabilities, and yet you have started to claim that it can be countered by the so-called "Brahmos", "Shaurya", and "Prahar" missiles; did your own education not teach you to not jump to conclusions without evidence or support? 
The railgun will install on future warships, to replace current 76mm or 130mm gun. At the same moment American also developing Navy Railgun.

It's not likely that this will be put on naval vessels since it's huge.
 
Ok Man I will not relate it with Chinese Education.

It is a fart attack fight in which capability of a so called (Yes never claimed by Chinese armed forces) is hyped so much. Not a surprise, so many such exaggerated claims we have seen in past. Later of dubbing them Dude by Chinese media themselves.
meh, meaningless and not funny.
 
The gun can be hidden by simply using camouflage or hardened bunkers and it would still usable.

First of all let Chinese army claim that they have the Gun with said capability.

How can the hidden Gun in bunker can be aimed against various enemy target?

Other options would include putting the gun in a huge array of air defense equipment. No large military asset go to war unprotected these days.

No air defense is enough to protect any such gun. India do not require even fire missile in Salvo mode. Missile like brahmos with high maneuverability is more than enough to penetrate any air defense.

Brahmos and Shaurya and Prahar can be intercepted by all sorts of air defense systems. That's what modern missiles are for and that's why the US are developing countermeasures to them.

No China do not have. Even we may send man mission to destroy that.

There is no technical limitation to a weapon's ability to fire suborbital rounds, especially one that size.


First of all make a proper Howitzer or proper rifle even by copying them and than talk of something of that sort.

Stop with the ad hominem and try to sound like a reasonable person.

Applies more to you.

We were not even given any detailed description on its capabilities, and yet you have started to claim that it can be countered by the so-called "Brahmos", "Shaurya", and "Prahar" missiles; did your own education not teach you to not jump to conclusions without evidence or support?


What an Idiot you are? What Gun's capability has to do with hitting it with Missile? Suppose it has the capability to hit the moon, How would it deter other missile to hit it?

Semi literate like you who correlate Gun's capability with its deterrence against attacking missile should not talk much about education. Since more you talk about education more you expose yourself.
 
First of all let Chinese army claim that they have the Gun with said capability.

How can the hidden Gun in bunker can be aimed against various enemy target?

Because the actual term "hidden" does not necessarily mean that it is buried or physically impeded. It could simply mean that it is camouflaged or placed in a casemate.



No air defense is enough to protect any such gun. India do not require even fire missile in Salvo mode. Missile like brahmos with high maneuverability is more than enough to penetrate any air defense.

Why not? If an air defense system can defend a navy ship, what makes a significantly lighter gun so hard to protect?


No China do not have. Even we may send man mission to destroy that.

China doesn't have surface to air missiles or anti missile systems? Please continue to believe that if it helps one sleep better.




First of all make a proper Howitzer or proper rifle even by copying them and than talk of something of that sort.

There's no need to restate the DRDO slogan; everyone knows it already.



Applies more to you.

The previous comments imply otherwise.




What an Idiot you are? What Gun's capability has to do with hitting it with Missile? Suppose it has the capability to hit the moon, How would it deter other missile to hit it?

That comment was directed at yours which claimed that "all Chinese capabilities are hyped".

Semi literate like you who correlate Gun's capability with its deterrence against attacking missile should not talk much about education. Since more you talk about education more you expose yourself.

Please read back a few posts and see who here is the one talking about "education".

And once again, if you want to augment your argument's merit, don't do it with ad hominem.
 
How effective is your so called Missile shield? Can it withstand against Brahmos or Shaurya or Prahar? Of course not.

Crappy Indian ballistic missiles like Shaurya or Prahaar aren't hitting anything. What is the CEP of these ballistic missiles? Brahmos is a Russian missile carried by a Russian Su-30MKI. Let me know when you're able to build the Brahmos and Su-30MKI on your own without Russian help. You can start bragging then.

China, on the other hand, has the entire country of India covered by highly accurate BeiDou-2 guided cruise missiles armed with our choice of conventional or nuclear warheads. And we have your country covered from the land, sea, and air.

On land with the CJ-10.

2jpqMR3.jpg


WUolUKY.jpg


From the sea with the 052D with 64 VLS cells per ship.

GWhhRe8.jpg


Tr31pTs.jpg


In the air with the H-6K.

SvxUTht.jpg


iuQke4q.jpg


We got your entire third world country covered by the BeiDou-2 satellite navigation system.

Beidou Navigation Satellite System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Beidou_Navigation_Satellite_System_2012.png
 
Last edited:
Interesting, if its a Railgun or perhaps a laser gun? but the article suggests that they don't see any electrical connection nor environmental protection, perhaps they are testing a longer range ship gun for their frigates.
 
Because the actual term "hidden" does not necessarily mean that it is buried or physically impeded. It could simply mean that it is camouflaged or placed in a casemate.

What does in the bunker means?

Why not? If an air defense system can defend a navy ship, what makes a significantly lighter gun so hard to protect?

How much does that air defense cost? Are you going to deploy S300 or S400 to protect a gun? Suppose if you do (Looking to your history of 4 pest campaign), even though we have the capability to destroy that with oor long range MBRL strike and many more. 
China doesn't have surface to air missiles or anti missile systems? Please continue to believe that if it helps one sleep better.

yes China has but it is like other chinese weapons. Not at all worrying for US.

There's no need to restate the DRDO slogan; everyone knows it already.


Recently chinese media took a jibe and Expose J15 and J 31 terming them dude weapons of no use. Do you want me to post the link? Indian defense planner never take into account dude chinese weapons. e.g when they plan to counter chinese airforce, they discuss how to counter Su 30 MKK and not J 10. They are not worth paying attention even. 
Please read back a few posts and see who here is the one talking about "education".
And once again, if you want to augment your argument's merit, don't do it with ad hominem.


See man, I stopped talking about education as one Chinese member pointed it out. This post is simply a reply to you who commented on education.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom