Edevelop
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2007
- Messages
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 23
- Country
- Location
SAC FC-31 Stealth Fighter: News & Discussions
- Thread starter Donation
- Start date
AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
I would be suprised if China offers this plane for International Customers beyond itself and Pakistan , I mean why would they give out 5th generation stealth fighter jets to non allies ?
Here is the secret plant in a not so secret anymore flight
Never underestimate the Dragon force
Here is the secret plant in a not so secret anymore flight
Never underestimate the Dragon force
Last edited by a moderator:
Gessler
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,579
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Hey are you trying to deny the facts or what?
Have you yet read my post #21? I think only PAF will be ready to buy such a crappy plane
as J-31. Even if anyone else buys it, they'll be the first thing going down in a war.
and im not impressed with the DSI at all. it limits max speed at 1.6 mach while PAKFA can zoom off
at 2.55 mach.
talking of TODAY, the Su-30MKI is king.
you have only 18 of those blk-52s i think.
Have you yet read my post #21? I think only PAF will be ready to buy such a crappy plane
as J-31. Even if anyone else buys it, they'll be the first thing going down in a war.
and im not impressed with the DSI at all. it limits max speed at 1.6 mach while PAKFA can zoom off
at 2.55 mach.
talking of TODAY, the Su-30MKI is king.
And where is F-16 Block 52 in your list ?
you have only 18 of those blk-52s i think.
fatman17
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 32,563
- Reaction score
- 98
- Country
- Location
J-31 (Jianjiji-31 Fighter aircraft 31)
The Chinese military leaked the first photos of long-rumored new stealth fighter, the second model revealed in China.The J-31 attracted wide public attention in June when some online pictures showed the cutting-edge fighter fully wrapped but with its futuristic shape still discernible. The J-31 fighter, named Falcon Eagle in Chinese, took its first flight at 10:32 am Beijing local time, Wednesday 31 October 2012, along with two J-11BS fighter jets from the runway of Shenyang Aircraft Corp, the producer and researcher of the fighter in Liaoning Province.
Shenyang Aircraft Industry Group (SAC), one of the leading aircraft design and manufacturing corporations of China�s aviation industry, revealed the prototype of what might eventually become Chinese analog to the American F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The new aircraft, said to be designated the J-31 or to have the codename F-60, has external characteristics that suggest to some that it could be used on future Chinese aircraft carriers. The J-31 prototype jet has the side number 31001, which is the origin of the J-31 nomenclature, since the first two J-20 prototypes had �2001� and �2002� side numbers, respectively.
Photos of a model labeled F-60 were posted online as early as September 2011. These images show only scaled-down models, not the real thing, with one notable difference being the single wheel in the model versus the paired nose-wheels in the real deal. This radio-controlled F-60 model had been built with the Shenyang University of Aeronautics and Astronautics [SUAA]. In June 2012 a photograph of a full scale airframe being transported on a truck trailer, obscured by netting, appeared online.
Though no characteristics of the prototype have been unveiled, one major difference is obvious: unlike its American relative, China�s J-31 has two engines, as does the previously revealed J-20. The pictures of the Chinese technology demonstrator suggest that the engines the aircraft is currently equipped with do not have thrust vectoring nozzles. Possibly the prototype is at an early a stage of testing, and might be fitted with a more sophisticated and powerful propulsion package at a later date. The twin vertical tail and wide-spaced ram air inlets are reminiscent of these features on the Lockheed Martin�s F-22 Raptor.
The J-31 inlet design features diverterless supersonic inlet [DSI] similar in concept to that used on the American F-35. The F-35's diverterless inlet lightens the overall weight of the aircraft. Traditional aircraft inlets were comprised of many moving parts and are much heavier than newer diverterless inlets. The diverterless inlet also eliminates all moving parts. DSI moved from concept to reality when it was flown on a Block 30 F-16 in a highly successful demonstration program consisting of twelve flights flown in nine days in December 1996. Unlike the Russians and Indians, whose joint project to develop a fifth generation aircraft produced a single design, the Chinese military followed the American example and placed its bets on two horses: Chengdu Aircraft Corporation, which is already testing the J-20 fifth generation heavy combat aircraft, and Shenyang Aircraft Industry Group with its F-31/F-60 aircraft. It is unclear which America practice the Chinese have emulated. Possibly this is like the Advanced Tactical Fighter and Joint Strike Fighter programs, in which competing designs were flight tested before one was selected for production. Or possibly the J-31 and J-20 are not to be regarded as competitors, but as complementary pair such as the F-22 and F-35, because to some it appeared the aircraft may have different specializations.
The problem with the competitive fly-off explanation is that the first flight of the J-20 came in January 2010, nearly two years before the first flight of the J-31. This belies a competitive fly-off, absent a rather spectacular schedule delay in the J-31, or an extremely sedate development schedule in which such a two year discrepancy is insignficant in the long view. The complementary role explanation fails due to the apparent similarity in size. Unlike the large twin-engine air-superiority F-22 and smaller single engine air-to-ground F-35, both the graceful J-20 and the slightly shorter but visibly chunkier J-31 are twin-engined, presumably with the same WS10 Taihang engines. If the total weight of the shorter J-31 was signficiantly less than that of the J-20 [a fact not in evidence], either the J-31 would seem rather over-powered, or the J-20 somewhat under-powered.
China's J-31 stealth fighter may also be used on the carrier in future. The Liaoning would have about 40 fixed-wing aircraft on board. Possibly the complementarity lies in the J-20 being destined for land-based operations, while the J-31 is slated to go down to the sea in ships. Carrier based aircraft are normally twin-engined for safety reasons, and the Chinese might have decided that the greater structural strength needed for carrier operations would be wasted on a land-based J-20. The shorter J-31 would also make for easier handling on an aircraft carrier, where space is at a premium. The Chinese might also have decided that little was to be gained from trying to apply a common airframe to both the land and carrier missions. The F-4 Phantom succeeded in this effort, but the American F-35 was bedeviled by the requirements of being all things to all services.
The Chinese Military Review website published computer-generated images of the J-31 fifth generation fighter jet in action, with a variety of air to air missiles. On at least two images the aircraft is depicted with an extended tailhook that sea-based aircraft use to stop after landing on the deck of an aircraft carrier. The two-wheeled front rack chassis of the J-31 prototype also suggests the aircraft was designed for naval use, facilitating the attachment of the holdback device installed on the nosegear to the catapult, like sea-based versions of Dassault�s Rafale in France, Lockheed Martin�s F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet and the Russian Su-33. There is no indications that the J-31 prototype is capable of short take off and vertical landing, a capability of the F-35B STOVL variant.
The current weak point of the J-31 - and the J-20, and the non-stealthy J-15 [also known as the Flying Shark, which is said to be a match for US F-18 Hornet fighters] - is its Russia-made Al-31 engines, which are less powerful than those of the American F-35 fighter. However, these fighters will be more competitive in future when the Chinese jets is equipped with more powerful Chinese engines, because the American F-35 has only a single engine.
As is well known, both Chengdu�s J-20 and Shenyang�s J-31 face the problem of the lack of reliable Chinese-made jet engines with technical characteristics appropriate for a fifth generation fighter. Initially both may be fitted with Klimov RD-93 afterburning turbofans from Russia. China continues to buy Russian military jet engines. The WS10 Taihang, China's flagship jet fighter engine, remained seriously flawed after a quarter of century of development effort. The WS10 engine was intended to equip the new J-10 fighter, low-rate initial production of which was authorised in 2002. But at least the initial run of fifty J-10 aircraft were to be fitted with Russian AL-31F engines instead. The WS10 engine was reverse-engineered from the CFM-56 commercial turbofan, which in turn was a derivative of the General Electric F101 engine originally designed for the 1960s-era Advanced Manned Strategic Aircraft, which was eventually deployed as the B-1 bomber. That is to say, after nearly a quarter century development effort on a four decade old design, China remained unable to produce a viable high performance fighter engine. It is expected that eventually both the J-20 and J-31 will be fitted with the WS15 engine, but the core engine for the WS-15 engine was first tested in April 2005, suggesting a long road ahead.
China lacks the extensive electronic support [eg, RIVET JOINT, AWACS, etc] and aerial refueling capabilities that American stealth aicraft can rely upon. The J-31 might achieve an initial operational capability in the 2025 timeframe.
his thread should be moved to chinese section.
The Chinese military leaked the first photos of long-rumored new stealth fighter, the second model revealed in China.The J-31 attracted wide public attention in June when some online pictures showed the cutting-edge fighter fully wrapped but with its futuristic shape still discernible. The J-31 fighter, named Falcon Eagle in Chinese, took its first flight at 10:32 am Beijing local time, Wednesday 31 October 2012, along with two J-11BS fighter jets from the runway of Shenyang Aircraft Corp, the producer and researcher of the fighter in Liaoning Province.
Shenyang Aircraft Industry Group (SAC), one of the leading aircraft design and manufacturing corporations of China�s aviation industry, revealed the prototype of what might eventually become Chinese analog to the American F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The new aircraft, said to be designated the J-31 or to have the codename F-60, has external characteristics that suggest to some that it could be used on future Chinese aircraft carriers. The J-31 prototype jet has the side number 31001, which is the origin of the J-31 nomenclature, since the first two J-20 prototypes had �2001� and �2002� side numbers, respectively.
Photos of a model labeled F-60 were posted online as early as September 2011. These images show only scaled-down models, not the real thing, with one notable difference being the single wheel in the model versus the paired nose-wheels in the real deal. This radio-controlled F-60 model had been built with the Shenyang University of Aeronautics and Astronautics [SUAA]. In June 2012 a photograph of a full scale airframe being transported on a truck trailer, obscured by netting, appeared online.
Though no characteristics of the prototype have been unveiled, one major difference is obvious: unlike its American relative, China�s J-31 has two engines, as does the previously revealed J-20. The pictures of the Chinese technology demonstrator suggest that the engines the aircraft is currently equipped with do not have thrust vectoring nozzles. Possibly the prototype is at an early a stage of testing, and might be fitted with a more sophisticated and powerful propulsion package at a later date. The twin vertical tail and wide-spaced ram air inlets are reminiscent of these features on the Lockheed Martin�s F-22 Raptor.
The J-31 inlet design features diverterless supersonic inlet [DSI] similar in concept to that used on the American F-35. The F-35's diverterless inlet lightens the overall weight of the aircraft. Traditional aircraft inlets were comprised of many moving parts and are much heavier than newer diverterless inlets. The diverterless inlet also eliminates all moving parts. DSI moved from concept to reality when it was flown on a Block 30 F-16 in a highly successful demonstration program consisting of twelve flights flown in nine days in December 1996. Unlike the Russians and Indians, whose joint project to develop a fifth generation aircraft produced a single design, the Chinese military followed the American example and placed its bets on two horses: Chengdu Aircraft Corporation, which is already testing the J-20 fifth generation heavy combat aircraft, and Shenyang Aircraft Industry Group with its F-31/F-60 aircraft. It is unclear which America practice the Chinese have emulated. Possibly this is like the Advanced Tactical Fighter and Joint Strike Fighter programs, in which competing designs were flight tested before one was selected for production. Or possibly the J-31 and J-20 are not to be regarded as competitors, but as complementary pair such as the F-22 and F-35, because to some it appeared the aircraft may have different specializations.
The problem with the competitive fly-off explanation is that the first flight of the J-20 came in January 2010, nearly two years before the first flight of the J-31. This belies a competitive fly-off, absent a rather spectacular schedule delay in the J-31, or an extremely sedate development schedule in which such a two year discrepancy is insignficant in the long view. The complementary role explanation fails due to the apparent similarity in size. Unlike the large twin-engine air-superiority F-22 and smaller single engine air-to-ground F-35, both the graceful J-20 and the slightly shorter but visibly chunkier J-31 are twin-engined, presumably with the same WS10 Taihang engines. If the total weight of the shorter J-31 was signficiantly less than that of the J-20 [a fact not in evidence], either the J-31 would seem rather over-powered, or the J-20 somewhat under-powered.
China's J-31 stealth fighter may also be used on the carrier in future. The Liaoning would have about 40 fixed-wing aircraft on board. Possibly the complementarity lies in the J-20 being destined for land-based operations, while the J-31 is slated to go down to the sea in ships. Carrier based aircraft are normally twin-engined for safety reasons, and the Chinese might have decided that the greater structural strength needed for carrier operations would be wasted on a land-based J-20. The shorter J-31 would also make for easier handling on an aircraft carrier, where space is at a premium. The Chinese might also have decided that little was to be gained from trying to apply a common airframe to both the land and carrier missions. The F-4 Phantom succeeded in this effort, but the American F-35 was bedeviled by the requirements of being all things to all services.
The Chinese Military Review website published computer-generated images of the J-31 fifth generation fighter jet in action, with a variety of air to air missiles. On at least two images the aircraft is depicted with an extended tailhook that sea-based aircraft use to stop after landing on the deck of an aircraft carrier. The two-wheeled front rack chassis of the J-31 prototype also suggests the aircraft was designed for naval use, facilitating the attachment of the holdback device installed on the nosegear to the catapult, like sea-based versions of Dassault�s Rafale in France, Lockheed Martin�s F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet and the Russian Su-33. There is no indications that the J-31 prototype is capable of short take off and vertical landing, a capability of the F-35B STOVL variant.
The current weak point of the J-31 - and the J-20, and the non-stealthy J-15 [also known as the Flying Shark, which is said to be a match for US F-18 Hornet fighters] - is its Russia-made Al-31 engines, which are less powerful than those of the American F-35 fighter. However, these fighters will be more competitive in future when the Chinese jets is equipped with more powerful Chinese engines, because the American F-35 has only a single engine.
As is well known, both Chengdu�s J-20 and Shenyang�s J-31 face the problem of the lack of reliable Chinese-made jet engines with technical characteristics appropriate for a fifth generation fighter. Initially both may be fitted with Klimov RD-93 afterburning turbofans from Russia. China continues to buy Russian military jet engines. The WS10 Taihang, China's flagship jet fighter engine, remained seriously flawed after a quarter of century of development effort. The WS10 engine was intended to equip the new J-10 fighter, low-rate initial production of which was authorised in 2002. But at least the initial run of fifty J-10 aircraft were to be fitted with Russian AL-31F engines instead. The WS10 engine was reverse-engineered from the CFM-56 commercial turbofan, which in turn was a derivative of the General Electric F101 engine originally designed for the 1960s-era Advanced Manned Strategic Aircraft, which was eventually deployed as the B-1 bomber. That is to say, after nearly a quarter century development effort on a four decade old design, China remained unable to produce a viable high performance fighter engine. It is expected that eventually both the J-20 and J-31 will be fitted with the WS15 engine, but the core engine for the WS-15 engine was first tested in April 2005, suggesting a long road ahead.
China lacks the extensive electronic support [eg, RIVET JOINT, AWACS, etc] and aerial refueling capabilities that American stealth aicraft can rely upon. The J-31 might achieve an initial operational capability in the 2025 timeframe.
his thread should be moved to chinese section.
Edevelop
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2007
- Messages
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 23
- Country
- Location
The max is 1.8 mach actually. The 1.6 is with hard points. and i'm sure the same cause can be applied to every fighter. The issue is not with DSI but with engines. We are currently using RD-93s. In the future we should be able to get the more powerful WS-13
Akasa
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,227
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
If the J-31 is "crappy", then so is the T-50 and the F-35. So far the DSI does not limit the aircraft's speed to Mach 1.8, but rather Mach 2, and only if the DSI aren't variable, which is unlikely the case in the J-31 and J-20; the DSI also covers the fan blades and therefore makes the plane stealthier, unlike the T-50 which exposes its fan blades.
RazPaK
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,056
- Reaction score
- -49
- Country
- Location
The Indian is crazy. He is comparing peanuts to peanuts.
Akasa
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,227
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
What does the West and Russia have that China doesn't? It seems that you've been a bit oblivious towards the Chinese aerospace industry for the past 10 years.
It depends on which areas you are referring to. Yes, Russia may be ahead in terms of large transport aircraft, but China certainly has mastered some trades as well such as electronics, UAVs, and stealth design.
It's funny how you claim China has yet to master 5th generation technology. China has built more AESA radar variants than any other European country including Russia. China also has tested fifth generation technology aboard previous generation fighters such as the J-11B, J-15, J-16, and J-10B. In fact, if you compare the various systems appearing in China compared to that of the West, you'd find that whatever gap that existed during the previous decade has been either made up or surpassed. In terms of technology, China's J-11B, J-15, and J-16 fighters already possess all that is available on the Su-35, such as a powerful phased array radar, engines, RAM, composites, IRST, MAWS, etc.
If the J-31 isn't defined a 5th generation fighter, then neither is the F-22 or F-35. In fact, the T-50 and F-35 lacks at least two of the features that allows it to be defined a "5th generation fighter". The F-35 lacks supercruise, supermaneuverability, and the T-50 lacks stealth.
IAF doesn't have a qualitative edge over the PLAAF in any way, especially when its top line fighter still lacks the extent of the upgrades seen on China's second-line J-11B, such as AESA radar, RAM, composites, and 132 kN engines. Oh, and we haven't even touched on the IAF's lack of force multipliers, EW aircraft, bomber aircraft, and advanced sensors when compared to the PLAAF. Welcome to the 21st century, buddy.
He would be considered once he provides his reasoning. DSI has its advantages in modern warfare.
Gessler
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,579
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Хотя размеры воздухозаборников и позволяют установку более мощных двигателей - их форма просто не позволит J-20 достичь скоростей более 1.6 скорости звука. Вероятно, его максимальная скорость составит не более 1.5М (скоростей звука
на большой высоте. Although the size of the air intakes allows for the installation of more powerful engines - their form would not let J-20 to reach speeds more than 1.6 speed of sound. Probably a top speed of no more than 1.5M (speed of sound) at high altitude.
http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/j20.html
What is true for J-20 is also true for J-31. Even F-35's speed with the behemoth 191-kN F135 engine is limited at Mach 1.6.
J-31 is clearly not upto the standard of jets like PAKFA or F-22 or even F-35.
PAKFA uses other methods rather than shaping to hide fan blades, you'll know about those systems
soon enough. The Russians already perfected S-shape ducts with the Su-47 Berkut, but still they
decided to go for the type of ducts you see on PAKFA today for reasons you'll come to know by and
by.
DSI may make a plane stealthier but not always. F-35 (with DSI) has a frontal RCS of 0.0025m2
or the size of a golfball while F-22 (without DSI) has a frontal RCS of 0.0001m2 or the size of metal
marble. Plus the spherical shape of the DSI bumps actually adds to RCS when scanned in certain
wavelengths, although not always.
Gessler
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,579
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
J-31 will be forced to carry external hardpoints (which add both RCS and drag) becoz with just 4 missiles in internal bays J-31's battlefield operations will be tough and you'll need to fly twice the no. of sorties as IAF to do the same level of damage.
The thrust increase offered by WS-13 vis-a-vis RD-93 is mearge. According to few sources WS-13 is going to take much more time than expected to get ready -
According to CAST blog, in interview to CAST representative at Zhuhai a Deputy Director of SARI has reported that the current TBO of WS-10A Taihang is only 300 hours. Progress with improving TBO and other characteristics is persist, but going slow. By his words, it is impossible to name a single issue causing difficulties with Chinese aircraft engines - there are a range of issues, including those related to process organisation and personnel. The situation with WS-13 Taishan, which should replace the Russian RD-93, is even more complicated than with Taihang - TBO for WS-13 is less then that 1/2 than for WS-10A."
^^http://bmpd.livejournal.com/383025.html
The chinese jet engines have years to go before being even as relaible as RD-93, whose MRO facilities
are still not present anywhere in Pak or China.
Akasa
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,227
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
The J-31 is a stealth fighter, meaning that once it opens up the door for other planes, the 4.5 gen fighters will do the rest. The payload of the J-31 depends on the thrust to weight ratio, which will be comparable to the F-35.
Nishan_101
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2007
- Messages
- 3,826
- Reaction score
- -18
Other than Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Jordan and Oman should look towards getting it. For Oman(25-30), Jordan(50-70), UAE(Production of 50-70) and For Saudi Arabia(Production 160-210) would be much better.
Gessler
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,579
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Akasa
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2008
- Messages
- 7,227
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Хотя размеры воздухозаборников и позволяют установку более мощных двигателей - их форма просто не позволит J-20 достичь скоростей более 1.6 скорости звука. Вероятно, его максимальная скорость составит не более 1.5М (скоростей звука
Although the size of the air intakes allows for the installation of more powerful engines - their form would not let J-20 to reach speeds more than 1.6 speed of sound. Probably a top speed of no more than 1.5M (speed of sound) at high altitude.
Chengdu J-20
What is true for J-20 is also true for J-31. Even F-35's speed with the behemoth 191-kN F135 engine is limited at Mach 1.6.
J-31 is clearly not upto the standard of jets like PAKFA or F-22 or even F-35.
PAKFA uses other methods rather than shaping to hide fan blades, you'll know about those systems
soon enough. The Russians already perfected S-shape ducts with the Su-47 Berkut, but still they
decided to go for the type of ducts you see on PAKFA today for reasons you'll come to know by and
by.
DSI may make a plane stealthier but not always. F-35 (with DSI) has a frontal RCS of 0.0025m2
or the size of a golfball while F-22 (without DSI) has a frontal RCS of 0.0001m2 or the size of metal
marble. Plus the spherical shape of the DSI bumps actually adds to RCS when scanned in certain
wavelengths, although not always.
This source mentions that the DSI limit is actually Mach 2.0, and even it mentions that it is possible to fly faster than Mach 2.0 with DSI with new designs, which the J-20 does (i.e. variable geometry DSI on the J-10). Code One Magazine: JSF Diverterless Supersonic Inlet Also, like I said, DSI has huge advantages in stealth, something the T-50 needs to work with.
The J-31 incorporates all of the upgrades on the F-35 and T-50, which, by the way, still lacks the two "S" to complete its 5th generation definition: stealth and supermaneuverability. Even though we do not know much, the images suggest that the J-31 already has a major stealth advantage over the T-50.
Similar threads
