Empirical evidence was included.
The opposite is the case. It's me saying "this is so for reason X, Y and Z", with X, Y and Z being either empirical data i.e. proof in and by itself, or excessively well documented to the point of allowing for immediate independent verification.
More like I'm not exactly interested in reposting the same content simply because another user is refusing to read it properly.
I substantiated my statements with evidence. To access said evidence, all one needs to do is to refer to my contribution.
All of them, actually.
Solid evidence was produced in support of my post's content.
Furthermore, what makes you assume I'm offended by your gratuitously confrontational attitude? In fact I'm overly glad, since all it achieves is to expose yourself as incapable of conducting normal, fact-based and rational discussion, for lack of valid counter-arguments.
For me to defend my points, someone would actually need to challenge them. Which you in fact hardly did.Why this is so shall be anyone's guess.
I do not remember employing these or similar terms.
