What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
:coffee: :sarcastic: :omghaha:
So what is your definition of a Ukrainian AZOV neo-NAZI victory?

The surrender of their field commander US Navy Admiral Eric Thor Olson and British Lieut Colonel John Bailey to the DNR LNR militia and Russian Forces represent a Ukrainian Victory, right?
I guess the russians have failed to explain the choir what the goal is, except russian expansion. I have no definition of ukrainian victory, but I believe the goal is to send the russians back home.
Please spare me from the russian propaganda ”nazi” stories. Im not some anti western muppet. Its wasted on me.

Eric Thor Olson retired more than 10 years ago and is 70+ years old. Do you just copy and paste anything from the russian disinformation campaign?
 
Guys I have a question, is it true that British MoD asking for ceasefire to Russia but Russia is ignoring it. Why would British asking for ceasefire instead of Ukraine?
 
lol, now Russian trolls are claiming that Donetsk river operation wasn't an feint but that those vehicles are actually Ukrainian. Story changes everyday.
Same goes with the Snake Island air assault. Russian trolls trying to paint it as a failed ukrainian invasion. Its laughable. Russia just dont seem to be able to admit even minor failure.

Guys I have a question, is it true that British MoD asking for ceasefire to Russia but Russia is ignoring it. Why would British asking for ceasefire instead of Ukraine?
The pope asked it too. I guess the vatican controls Ukraine now.
 
1652622566566.png
 
Pe
Same goes with the Snake Island air assault. Russian trolls trying to paint it as a failed ukrainian invasion. Its laughable. Russia just dont seem to be able to admit even minor failure.


The pope asked it too. I guess the vatican controls Ukraine now.
Pope should act as man of peace, he doesn't involve in this conflict. Same couldn't be said about British MoD who clearly -not only siding, but- supplying weapons to Ukraine.
 

This man is living in the past as well. He is vouching for Fascism and nuclear war. For a man who markets himself as a political economist, he does not seem to understand that Russia should stop attacking other countries around it because these developments have eroded Russian goodwill in the Western hemisphere, invited sanctions and hampered Russian economic growth.



1. Average Russian have no desire for total war with the Western hemisphere.


People want to live, grow and prosper in life around the world. This necessitates global connectivity.

2. Vladimir Putin is a man of the past as pointed out in the following article:


Putin probably wanted to revive USSR by reclaiming former SSR, but is this project feasible?

- Perceptions in a region can shift over time.
- Political realities of a region can shift over time.

Putin might have felt the need to reclaim Ukraine but he wasn't mindful of the shift in perceptions and political realities of Ukraine. Russia managed to rebuild its army but it wasn't up to the task to reclaim Ukraine by force.

3. One of the Russian oligarchs close to Putin have recently disclosed that his health is in decline and nuclear war is out of question.

-----

Those in power should stop living in the past and look for ways to adjust to emerging realities and how to shape them.

For perspective, Pakistan' Eastern Half split and became Bangladesh in 1971. This was a painful development but Pakistan came to terms with this reality.

So what are the options?

Option 1: Try to develop relations with Bangladesh
Option 2: Try to annex Bangladesh

Option 1 is logical, sensible and least costly path obviously - common sense.

-----

USA is the largest country in the Western hemisphere with well-defined boundaries and the capacity to lead Western hemisphere. There is consistency in American political system, and USA is able to develop solutions for the Western hemisphere by and large. This is one of the reasons why USA is LEGIT superpower. USA is not trying to annex countries around it by force even though its military might is unmatched.

- Russia did not learn from USA to its detriment.

- China learned from USA and achieved much growth on the other hand.
 
This man is living in the past as well. He is vouching for Fascism and nuclear war. For a man who markets himself as a political economist, he does not seem to understand that Russia should stop attacking other countries around it because these developments have eroded Russian goodwill in the Western hemisphere, invited sanctions and hampered Russian economic growth.



1. Average Russian have no desire for total war with the Western hemisphere.


People want to live, grow and prosper in life around the world. This necessitates global connectivity.

2. Vladimir Putin is a man of the past as pointed out in the following article:


Putin probably wanted to revive USSR by reclaiming former SSR, but is this project feasible?

- Perceptions in a region can shift over time.
- Political realities of a region can shift over time.

Putin might have felt the need to reclaim Ukraine but he wasn't mindful of the shift in perceptions and political realities of Ukraine. Russia managed to rebuild its army but it wasn't up to the task to reclaim Ukraine by force.

3. One of the Russian oligarchs close to Putin have recently disclosed that his health is in decline and nuclear war is out of question.

-----

Those in power should stop living in the past and look for ways to adjust to emerging realities and how to shape them.

For perspective, Pakistan' Eastern Half split and became Bangladesh in 1971. This was a painful development but Pakistan came to terms with this reality.

So what are the options?

Option 1: Try to develop relations with Bangladesh
Option 2: Try to annex Bangladesh

Option 1 is logical, sensible and least costly path obviously - common sense.

-----

USA is the largest country in the Western hemisphere with well-defined boundaries and the capacity to lead Western hemisphere. There is consistency in American political system, and USA is able to develop solutions for the Western hemisphere by and large. This is one of the reasons why USA is LEGIT superpower. USA is not trying to annex countries around it by force even though its military might is unmatched.

- Russia did not learn from USA to its detriment.

- China learned from USA and achieved much growth on the other hand.
He worked in the USA state as "United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy"


He is pointing the moon and you're looking his finger.

He's telling how USA handle European leaders through money and bribes.

He just are saying that all the crisis is a USA made crisis. They just use their money to change European leaders opinion about a topic.

He saw how USA did that in the past, and he's guessing that USA is doing the same now.

We must be grateful of someone who worked inside USA state tell us now how really USA rules the world, and particularly how USA rules Europe.

Without Western money in Kiev, it never had happened Ukraine war.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom