The case was handled in a lower court, where it was dismissed because the court decided that the plaintiff did not have any standing. The case was then brought t9 SCOTUS to determine if the plaintiff had any standing or not and the SCOTUS ruled that the lower court was correct in that the plaintiff did not have any standing.
For the final time, the
SCOTUS DID NOT RULE on anything, you cannot hand down a ruling if you did not hear the case, how did you rule on something you have not heard the argument on both side
SCOTUS only hear cases that are related to the Constitution, they aren't High Court in any other place like in Australia that will hear anything. Whether or not the plaintiff have standing or anything have nothing to do with what the SCOTUS. They didn't hear that case because that is not of constitutional matter.
If and when Trump was convicted and jailed and he argue Habeas Corpus in front of the Supreme Court, then yes, SCOTUS will hear that case and see if it violate Trump's constitution right for locking him up for what he did as a President of the United States. This Texas case is what SCOTUS saying you bring the wrong case to the SCOTUS, we don't hear that so they ejected the case.
Anyone can ask for an ID if the reason is reasonable.
You can ask for ID, but I have the right not to show you, even if you are a Police Officer, you cannot stop or detain me on the street just ask for my ID, that's violating that person's 4A right you need to have either a probable clause or reasonable suspicion that a crime is committed and you fit the description, even then I don't really need to show them because I have both 4A and 5A, I don't need to tell or show the Police anything, just that by doing that the cop can apply for a court order or warrant and obtain your ID (fingerprint, DNA) circumventing the 4A.
Company can ask for your ID before they hire you, but you do NOT need to show them because of 4A, if they did not hire you solely because you refused to show them the ID, that's violating someone 4A right and may even be civilly liable for discrimination.
The 4th amendment.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
I would say that an employer have a right to know who he hires.
You can say anything you want, that does not mean employer have a right to know who he hires.
Noone is forcing anyone to seek employment at a certain company.
View attachment 959094
The law may not even require anyone to show ID to the employer.
The law may say that noone is allowed to hire someone which is an illegal alien, and to prove that no illegal alien is hired.
Up to the employer to prove. This gives him a reasonable cause to ask for id, and the constitution is not violated.
Dude, you are comparing something different.
YOU WANT TO DRIVE, so you apply for a driver license, and that's the condition that you need to carry them while operating a vehicle, and you agreed to that term so that you could drive on the road, nobody is forcing you to take a driver license, you are doing it on your own initiative. You don't want to carry one, then don't drive
That's different than you are force to have a driver license by law, because you "MAY" choose to drive. It's the same with the Company asking for your ID, they can of course ask for your ID, but I don't need to show them anything, and if they did not hire me because of that and not because of I am less than suitable for the job, then there will be a 4A lawsuit.
”Securing the border” does not solve the problem when many become illegal aliens by overstaying their visas.
You are paying the government to do a job, and then you make it impossible for them to do that job. You are of course allowed to make that prioritization, but don’t expect to be treated seriously if you complain about illegal aliens.
You make the bed, you get to sleep in it.
Well, then tell me how you can stem illegal immigrant? I used to live in Hong Kong and by law, everyone requires to carry an ID Card all the time when you are outside, and you have to be fingerprinted when you get your ID Card. Everyone need to show their ID Card for whatever they do, and police can stop you and check you for ID, even now if you want to go Yumcha in a restaurant, you will need to show your ID Card and proof that you are vaccinated against COVID not to mention getting a job. And illegal immigrant is actually a crime and you have to go to jail instead of being deported for it
Does that mean Hong Kong does not have illegal immigrant problem?
Illegal immigrant jailed
www.immd.gov.hk
Again, I don't care what they do to stem illegal immigration, you don't encroach into my 1,4, 5, 6A right to do so, I pay their salary by paying taxes, that's their failure, it's not like they are a volunteer force and doing the best that they can, coming on us legal citizen is not at all an acceptable solution, if you think it's okay to take away Amendment right just because of that, then it's you, and you may as well live in China.
