Half the population fleed Mariupol, and Russia needs to build appartments .. how come?
Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2
- Thread starter waz
- Start date
Putin decides what growth percentage to publish. Its all balloony. There is zero transparency in Russia, yet news outlets keep posting those imaginary numbers provided by Russia when discussing sanctions and what effects they have.
Russias revenue from oil and gas products has dropped more than 50% compared to pre war conditions, but magic growth in revenue from non oil and gas products made up for those losses in less than a year, according to state provided stats. It is ridiculous.
jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Well, if all attempt at government fail, you have a election.
We can't have a election in the US, you get stuck with this dysfunctional government because the constitution dictate when and where and how an election is held
I know, it's still not that simple
Actually, it doesn't. That's the whole point why they refused to hear the Texas case.
Again, it doesn't, and it had not ruled on the case, the case was rejected without any ruling, SCOTUS cites lack of standing.
Have you actually read that?
U.S. Supreme Court will not hear challenge to Donald Trump’s ballot eligibility - UPI.com
The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear a case that seeks to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot in 2024.
www.upi.com
I don't see how hard it was to read my sentence.
Hack-Hook
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,448
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
that's the second time . its nothing news worthy here
by the way when a speech without doing a single damn thing win you noble peace prize.......
or war criminals and terrorists win it
or genocide supporters and the one who are guilty of crime against humanity win it
A.P. Richelieu
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 7,724
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
If a Texas Law was brought to the SCOTUS by someone from California, it could be rejected due to lack of standing, but if brought by someone from Texas they may make a judgement.
Lack of standing seems to me is more about who is suing than about the court.
It is a strange judgement, since every American has standing in who gets elected President. The SCOTUS did not rule on Trump, just if the plaintiff had standing or not. They did not publish any vote or motivation, so it might just be another case of corruption.
If not the SCOTUS, who has final say if someone is disqualified from office?
”because changing on constitution would mean taking people will away from them”Again, it doesn't, and it had not ruled on the case, the case was rejected without any ruling, SCOTUS cites lack of standing.
Have you actually read that?
U.S. Supreme Court will not hear challenge to Donald Trump’s ballot eligibility - UPI.com
The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear a case that seeks to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot in 2024.
I don't see how hard it was to read my sentence.
”because changing the Constitution would mean taking peoples will away from them”
I don’t understand what You mean by ”will”.
What the suggestion is doing is taking away the ”right” to be unknown to the government. It is taking away the right to do some illegal economic transactions without the government knowing about it.
Last edited:
Viet
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2012
- Messages
- 29,950
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Congrats Ukraine
Russia naval fleet is fleeing Sevastopol.
Otherwise Ukraine long range missiles and special commandos will give them the final blow.
www.atlanticcouncil.org
Russia naval fleet is fleeing Sevastopol.
Otherwise Ukraine long range missiles and special commandos will give them the final blow.
Putin’s fleet retreats: Ukraine is winning the Battle of the Black Sea
Putin was already struggling to account for his army’s evident inability to conquer a nation that he insists does not exist. He must now also explain how his once vaunted Black Sea Fleet is being defeated by a country without a navy, writes Peter Dickinson.
www.atlanticcouncil.org
jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
Again, it's NOT a judgement, the Supreme Court did not judge anything, because it refused to hear the case as they lack the standing, it's a legal term of this is outside Supreme Court of United States saying "We do not have the judiciary power to hear this case"
"No legal standing" can goes both way, the case should be heard in lower court, and the standing stopped there because you are talking about FEC nomination, if any applicant ineligibility should be determined by Federal Election Committe, not the Supreme Court. Again, Supreme Court only hear constitutional matter. Not anything else.
No offense, but you really don't understand what the scope of the SCOTUS is....I don't know how I can explain to you
You were talking about the Constitution of the United States, that's basically people's free will, especially 1A, when you have the freedom of religion, expression, assembly and petition. If you start changing here and there, then why don't we go live in China when you have to do what your government told you to do? Carry a National ID cards to start, then registered your job with SSN, and then you probably need to register your own personal detail to protest. That's what China do. I want to do what I want to do, if I don't want my SSN being report to my employer, the government shouldn't be able to force me to do that because of some illegal immigrant issue. And you aren't just talking about 1A, you are talking about amending 1st , 4th, 5th, and 6th amendment. That's more than taking people rightS, that's taking someone's will
Rights give you freedom to do things, otherwise known as free will, that's what make people, people.
And forgive me for the missing the or capitalise the word "Congress" I type the response on my phone this morning.
Last edited:
jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
I would be eyeing the 450 M1 Abrams and 260 MLRS the Marine dropped in 2022 if I were Zelenskyy. Minimal training, maximum usage
Yeah 31 tanks isn't going to cut it. At least 300 or more like you mentioned. They really need to speed it up sending in more and conserve those tanks already sent until its really ready to be used. And as you said more MLRS especially for the winter and less foliage to find the Russian artillery thanks to long range recon drones Ukrainians have now.
aziqbal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2010
- Messages
- 7,399
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Palestinian took more land than Ukraine did in 18 months
Ali_Baba
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 27, 2018
- Messages
- 6,417
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Very odd for them to shooting down a jet at that location. No Ukranian jet would be operating that deep right now. I can only assume that Russian defences are not good at distinguishing between a cruise missile and a jet? And also - why are the operators not interrogating the IFF of the jet before firing on it ??
Shows either Russian systems are pile of crap, or recruiting bakers, and policeman to operate SAM systems is not generally a good idea ...
Either way - not a good look for Russia.
Viet
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2012
- Messages
- 29,950
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
simply ridicukous. how is that possible? SU35 is Russia most advanced plane. they kill themselves out of sheer incompetence.
they have rubbish friend foe ID on the aircraft. Russia military complex has too much money but too corrupt. Putin brags but the army is exposed as cheap propaganda.
Similar threads
