Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2
- Thread starter waz
- Start date
aziqbal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2010
- Messages
- 7,403
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
A.P. Richelieu
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 7,724
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Show me a case where an employer is convicted for asking for ID then…
An employer has the right to have a CV, a right to get references.
They also have the right to verify the contents of the CV.
Do You think the CIA would hire someone without a background check?
The 4th amendment bans unreasonable behaviour, not reasonable behaviour.
If someone would sue, then they would be called up as a witness, and anonymous witnesses are an anomaly in Western law. You have to have a strong case for that.
”I don’t want the CIA to know I am a Russian FSB agent”, is not going to be a strong argument. So you would have to show proof who you are in court.
I’d like some proof of that.
That you cannot verify a CV is enough reason not to hire someone.
Last edited:
I think the next big zelensky show for the investors to show that they are "winning" would be some spectacular attack on Crimean bridge with numerous stormshadow and kamikaze drones. That being said Ukranian bridges over Dnieper are also totally vulnurable.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Russia can come up with their own version of Glonass guided unmanned sea drones something like the sea baby drone of Ukraine. Their drones have starlink real time video feed but glonass would be enough I think since bridges are static tatgets unlike ships that they use to hit. Damaging-destroying the columns of Dnieper crossings would definetly reduce Ukranian military supply chain. Drones can be dropped from Kherson or North from Balerus depending on the targeted bridge.
or better under water drone similar to this one and Ukranian bridges are much more vulnurable to this kind of attack.
The difficult part is the bridges are dual use so hitting during civilian traffic(which Ukraine did several times) would not be suitable. Giving prior notice would increase defenses but giving large time window and multiple targets would still be quiet effective.
List of crossings of the Dnieper - Wikipedia
Russia can come up with their own version of Glonass guided unmanned sea drones something like the sea baby drone of Ukraine. Their drones have starlink real time video feed but glonass would be enough I think since bridges are static tatgets unlike ships that they use to hit. Damaging-destroying the columns of Dnieper crossings would definetly reduce Ukranian military supply chain. Drones can be dropped from Kherson or North from Balerus depending on the targeted bridge.
or better under water drone similar to this one and Ukranian bridges are much more vulnurable to this kind of attack.
The difficult part is the bridges are dual use so hitting during civilian traffic(which Ukraine did several times) would not be suitable. Giving prior notice would increase defenses but giving large time window and multiple targets would still be quiet effective.
Last edited:
I believe the Glonass has a 5-10 meter horizontal precision and the russian battle damage assassment has been close to none existent outside drone reach. Given the amount of western supplied air defence systems to Ukraine since the beginning of the russian invasion, Russias ability to actually destroy every bridge over the Dnieper is quite slim.I think the next big zelensky show for the investors to show that they are "winning" would be some spectacular attack on Crimean bridge with numerous stormshadow and kamikaze drones. That being said Ukranian bridges over Dnieper are also totally vulnurable.
List of crossings of the Dnieper - Wikipedia
Russia can come up with their own version of Glonass guided unmanned sea drones something like the sea baby drone of Ukraine. Their drones have starlink real time video feed but glonass would be enough I think since bridges are static tatgets unlike ships that they use to hit. Damaging-destroying the columns of Dnieper crossings would definetly reduce Ukranian military supply chain. Drones can be dropped from Kherson or North from Balerus depending on the targeted bridge.
or better under water drone similar to this one and Ukranian bridges are much more vulnurable to this kind of attack.
The difficult part is the bridges are dual use so hitting during civilian traffic(which Ukraine did several times) would not be suitable. Giving prior notice would increase defenses but giving large time window and multiple targets would still be quiet effective.
Air defence cannot detect sea drones and much less likely underwater drones traveling under Dnieper. Glonass precision may not be enough to hit the column of the bridge. In that case terminal guidance can be with image pattern recognition for surface drone and maybe a sonar range finder-scanner for underwater drone to hit the column of the bridge to bring it down.
altafahmed
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2022
- Messages
- 196
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
This is the most probable ending of the war.
Viet
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2012
- Messages
- 29,950
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Ah that’s far from over. Biden still has a joker even if the congress stops the fundings. He can give the presidential order to give weapons to Ukraine direct from the US army.
Similar threads
