What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

With respect. I think their is misconception. Due to heavy AD manpads these choppers are flying low and targeting at very long range and there will be some issue of stabilization as they are zooming in at max effective range. Vikhr is a 12km range missile with laser beam guidance so yes the cursor has to be on target to keep it on lock mode. Laser beam is not NLOS but LOS missile so there will be these issues.

Honestly, I am puzzled by the reaction of PDF members as if Russian hardware is not good. Which is not true apart from tanks everything is working as good as any war machine. You are in enemy territory backed by NATO support and large no. of manpads. Even other choppers like Apache, Tiger, Cobra would face the same.
No lol, NATO helicopters and drones have object recognition and auto-tracking, if you were to look at Apache fire missions, you'd understand that once the Americans select the enemy tank, they don't even have to directly aim at it.
 
This isnt evidence, this is evidence:

"The Patriot defense system fails when it comes to drones or cruise missiles"


This is not correct.

Americans have shown integrated Patriot configurations that have demonstrated the capability to shoot down drones and cruise missiles in live-fire trials at home.

The question is what type of configuration was sold to KSA.

1. It looks like Saudi air defenses are underdeveloped in its current form. Saudi radar systems might be outdated.

2. US - KSA bilateral relationship is in turbulence.

The article has raised valid points.
 

"discuss the possibility of invoking" doesnt mean "invoked".

What do you mean?
You dumb fucks need to go prepare for whats coming.
Very soon a must have home appliance for every European house:

 
Last edited:
This is not correct.

Americans have shown integrated Patriot configurations that have demonstrated the capability to shoot down drones and cruise missiles in live-fire trials at home.

The question is what type of configuration was sold to KSA.

1. It looks like Saudi air defenses are underdeveloped in its current form. Saudi radar systems might be outdated.

2. US - KSA bilateral relationship is in turbulence.

The article has raised valid points.

I think when drones fly low, the Patriots were having problems with either recognizing them or taking them down.
 
This is not correct.

Americans have shown integrated Patriot configurations that have demonstrated the capability to shoot down drones and cruise missiles in live-fire trials at home.

The question is what type of configuration was sold to KSA.

1. It looks like Saudi air defenses are underdeveloped in its current form. Saudi radar systems might be outdated.

2. US - KSA bilateral relationship is in turbulence.

The article has raised valid points.

These are lame excuses. However which way you try to spin this, Iranian drones done a number on Patriot missiles. What was protecting US bases when those Iranian BMs smashed Ain Al Assad or where they misconfigured as well?!


Oh no, an investigation! Russia is running scared!
 
This doesn't appear to be a deliberate attack

Frank Gardner

BBC News, Security Correspondent

Smoke rises in the distance, amid reports of two explosions, seen from Nowosiolki, Poland, near the border with Ukraine November 15, 2022 in this image obtained from social media
ReutersCopyright: Reuters
An image posted on social media from a town 10km away from the blast shows smoke rising into the airImage caption: An image posted on social media from a town 10km away from the blast shows smoke rising into the air
When Russian missiles are being fired at targets so close to Poland’s border, and when Ukraine’s air defences are being activated to intercept them, it was perhaps only a matter of time before something like this happened.

The fact that a missile landed on Poland’s side of the border is of course a worrying development, not just for Poland but for all the states on Russia and Ukraine’s western borders.

Moldova has already complained about the effect of Russian missiles fired close to its borders.

But what matters here is what the intended target was, whoever fired the missile. And so far there is no indication that Russia was intentionally targeting anywhere beyond Ukraine’s borders.

The Kremlin knows that such a move would potentially trigger Article 5 of Nato’s constitution, theoretically bringing the entire alliance to Poland’s defence.

That is not a place Nato wants to be in, especially just a day after Russia and America’s spy chiefs have just been meeting to discuss how to avoid unnecessary escalation in this war.

Much of Ukraine’s vital supplies of defensive weaponry passes through Poland. Were that to be deliberately targeted it would be a different matter.

But that does not appear to be the case here.


Shows over, it wasnt deliberate and suggests that these missiles were accidental or Ukronazi AD misfiring. Same thing happened in Moldova. No article 5. All the chicken hawks in this thread can relax and neednt worry about hiding in the closet lol
 
Patriots. is not designed for drone attacks. What kind of turkey would fire multi-million dollar anti-aircraft missiles at small disposable drones?
 

1. Not true.

2. These lame bureaucratic proceedings show LACK of spine to respond to Russian moves in quick fashion under the garb of "investigations." As if NATO does not have surveillance assets in place to figure out what happened in Poland.

So NATO will take 1 day to call a meeting in which burgers and tea will be served to a bunch of bureaucratic cowards to reassure each other? Then NATO will take another day to condemn Russia? Then NATO will take another day to announce more sanctions on Russia? Then NATO will take another day to announce more aid to Ukraine?

About time NATO shows what it can do when up against a big power besides application of proxy warfare.

Ukraine has shown much more spine than NATO in my view. Shame.
 
These are lame excuses. However which way you try to spin this, Iranian drones done a number on Patriot missiles. What was protecting US bases when those Iranian BMs smashed Ain Al Assad or where they misconfigured as well?!



Oh no, an investigation! Russia is running scared!
I do not make lame excuses for any side. I am Facts & Figures oriented.

US has not fielded BMDS in Iraq.
 
1. Not true.

2. These lame bureaucratic proceedings show LACK of spine to respond to Russian moves in quick fashion under the garb of "investigations." As if NATO does not have surveillance assets in place to fugure out what happened in Poland.

So NATO will take 1 day to call a meeting in which burgers and tea will be served to a bunch of bureaucratic cowards to reassure each other? Then NATO will take another day to condemn Russia? Then NATO will take another day to announce more sanctions on Russia? Then NATO will take another day to announce more aid to Ukraine?

About time NATO shows what it can do when up against a big power besides application of proxy warfare.

Ukraine has shown much more spine than NATO in my view. Shame.
I will bet it's gonna be more sanctions as usual and more weapons as usual. And the cheerleaders will shout for blood as usual. Nobody has the balls!
 
Back
Top Bottom