Targeting civilian infrastructure is not a win. You tosh. Also Is Tajikistan rich? & Kazakhstan & their neighboring countries buying up Bayraktar. My point still stand.
no , its not shit , what make it shit according to you .
The Ukrainian themselves gave the bad review and seeing they mostly got shot down the moment Ukrainian set up their AAD is pretty much telling of quality. Also they can't even auto adjust their targeting. Basically limiting their effectiveness unlike other loitering munition.
the problem is Ukraine energy grid say something else . and about Ukrainian claims , were is shot down videos , only debris video . for god sake its a suicide UAV , its supposed to leave debris after hitting the target
maybe because of the engine sound , it is also called flying dorito , flying moped, flying lawn mover and many other things , Ukraine energy grid is talk for itself
who pursued that ?
I'm not calling him a liar, he's calling himself a liar.
Wow not bad
Russia claim some barrack and command center and training facility and what you call civillian target , NATO call double use target
Yes it looks the Russians retreating to the east of the Dnipro but I am sympathetic with Ukraine strategy: precautious approach, slow but steady advance, cutting them off supplies, letting them to suffer from hunger and thirst, pounding them with artillery until they piss off.
Ukraine better cut them off before they all left.
on that you are wrong , they just said they have emptied those facilities before
