Hassan Al-Somal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 6,825
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So alevi vs sunni war supported by russia (and a bit usa) is germanies obligation now?The refugees in the Middle East and Africa are not caused by China, and China has no obligation to accept these refugees. Europe and the USA are obliged to accept these refugees.
1. There were more refugeesChina has accepted all the 300k refugees caused by the China-Vietnam War. In addition, China has accepted 40k Rohingya refugees. China is much kinder than the EU.
I remember europe also pouring billions of aid into those countries and taking in hundreds of thousands of refugees….
According to International Agreements, China as well as any other country have to give asylum to anyone which can show that they are persecuted.The refugees in the Middle East and Africa are not caused by China, and China has no obligation to accept these refugees. Europe and the USA are obliged to accept these refugees.
China has accepted all the 300k refugees caused by the China-Vietnam War. In addition, China has accepted 40k Rohingya refugees. China is much kinder than the EU.
Vietnamese refugees well settled in China, await citizenship | UNHCR
GUANGXI ZHUANG AUTONOMOUS REGION, China, May 10 (UNHCR) - Even though he has spent three-quarters of his life outside Viet Nam, where he was born, Chen Youliang feels completely at home in his adopted country, China. His daughter, now 11, the same age Chen was when he fled fighting between China...www.unhcr.org
1, Syrian refugees are caused by NATO. Of course, you might say it's the United States and Turkey, not Germany. Germany is only a NATO ally. By the same token, China and Myanmar do not even have an alliance. Why should China be responsible for the refugees in Myanmar?So alevi vs sunni war supported by russia (and a bit usa) is germanies obligation now?
Nonsense, stop generalising the west.
1. There were more refugees
2. China started this war
3. China took in (ethnic) chinese only.
4.and discriminated against them still. No formal citizenship…(though then you can claim each year to house 300.000 refugees in UN charts….)
disgusting.
Rohingya.
1: show me link of that 40.000. I find one at 3000 that they wanted to resettle asap…there were millions refugees from a bordercountry….
2: china has kept strong ties with the agressor Myanmar….
3. China acts like its mostly a thing of economics. Absolutely no real critiscism or pressure to myanmar.
Seriously…lets use Chinas “kind approach” in european situation….
poland accepted million plus ukranian refugees
Germany accepted million plus syrians.
“China KINDNESS activated”
Sorry we only accept ethnic polish/germans….which we then will never give full status.
Oh maybe a handfull of thousands to atleast be able to say “were taking in refugees!!” While making economic deals and strong diplomatic ties with the agressor.
Sanctions? Critiscism? Ofcourse not…more russian/assad trade deals! Gimme that Money money money!
Seriously. Stop with the lies.
Keep it at “were a developing nation that doesnt like to get involved outside its borders” as an excuse why a superpower and 2nd economy of the world refuses to really take in refugees.
“Kinder then europe” seriously?
Hama massacre ring a bell?1, Syrian refugees are caused by NATO. Of course, you might say it's the United States and Turkey, not Germany. Germany is only a NATO ally. By the same token, China and Myanmar do not even have an alliance. Why should China be responsible for the refugees in Myanmar?
China taking in refugees on race basis?2, There were only Vietnamese Chinese refugees in the China-Vietnam War, and that war did not cause other nationalities to become refugees. China has given these refugees jobs and land, and their income is three times that of Vietnamese. Do you think China is not good enough for these refugees?
4, China is closely related to several autonomous states in northern Myanmar, not the central government of Myanmar. China has limited influence on Rohingyas in southern Myanmar. And now the Myanmar military government has suspended China's B&R project in Myanmar and blackmailed China to recognize the military government, so the relationship between the military governments of China and Myanmar is cold now, and they are unable to adjust the Rohingya issue for the time being. And China has taken in 30000 Rohingyas.
Europe time and again takes in hundreds of thousands of refugees. Many times from conflicts they do not play a part in.Didn't the news you read tell you that 300k Vietnamese refugees enjoy the same treatment as the Chinese? The Chinese govt did not drive them away. What's the problem with obtaining nationality later? The Chinese government needs to solve many legal procedures for them, which takes time.
I have clearly told you that the Vietnam War did not cause other ethnic groups to become refugees, only Vietnamese Chinese left Vietnam. In addition, you may not know that almost all Vietnamese have more or less Chinese descent. They can almost show evidence that they are Vietnamese Chinese.
I admit that 300k Vietnamese refugees have indeed waited for nationality for 40 years, and the Chinese govt is indeed not as efficient as Europe on this issue.
But the Chinese govt has never expelled or repatriated them, and has given them the same treatment. It is clear that they will eventually acquire nationality.
There is a Chinese proverb "Who shit and who wipes his a2s". China will bear the responsibility for the China-Vietnam War(China has accepted all the refugees caused by this war), and the same NATO countries should also bear the responsibility for the wars in which NATO has participated.
China's small number of refugees is due to the small number of wars China has participated in. Avoiding war is the greatest kindness. NATO countries bombed other countries into ruins and accepted some refugees. This is not "kindness", this is "atonement".
China's neighbors have two sources of refugees, one is Myanmar, and China is willing to assume the responsibility of Asian leaders. As long as Rohingya refugees can reach the Chinese border, China will host them. The other is Afghanistan. Afghan refugees should be received by NATO countries.
Who shit and who wipes his a2s!
Why the West wants China to accept more refugees? Because they hate China.
A year ago, the United States asked China to accept Afghan refugees.
US urges China to take Afghan refugees while accusing China of Muslim genocide. In all their scenarios, China is always the villain.
View attachment 865299
Could you debate somewhere else about China Vietnam and what not,nobody gives a flying fck about your discussion.
Dumping us all under the Nato pile?There is a Chinese proverb "Who shit and who wipes his a2s". China will bear the responsibility for the China-Vietnam War(China has accepted all the refugees caused by this war), and the same NATO countries should also bear the responsibility for the wars in which NATO has participated.
We have somalian, eritrean, iraqi, nigerian, bangladeshi, vietnamese, ukranian, syrian, bosnian, lebanese. Again many not because of Nato starting the war.China's small number of refugees is due to the small number of wars China has participated in. Avoiding war is the greatest kindness. NATO countries bombed other countries into ruins and accepted some refugees. This is not "kindness", this is "atonement".
Oh so you will host north korean defectors? Oh no you make deals with the korean dictator for money and power (like with assad, like in myanmar..), see them as “illegal economic migrants” and routinely drag them back to be tortured there….Who shit and who wipes his a2s!