What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

What did you expect: Western Europe and Ukrainians to act like p**sys and just welcome Putin and just give up because some theory on future generation being radicilized vs. a sure disaster for them to live under Putin (whoever can afford to leave has left Russia)? Your logic is one of a spineless whimp.

European GDPs are in Trillions, they can afford to spend tens of billions. Russia went into to take over Kiev, and install a Govt friendly to them. A 10 year old following Russia's propaganda and actions would know that. They have regressed from that goal to holding 15% , and on that they have to mobilize the entire country. So complete humiliation by virtue of its own actions.

May be you have been brainwashed too much: had Russia had the brains and used its energy (instead of brainwashing its sympathizers) , it would have gone in with a goal of protecting its supposed 'ethnic' population and just gone in to the 15% of land and would have some worldly prestige and retained more of its military and called it a day.

Instead it has degenerate people like you in a minority thinking its the victor when Kremlin's own insiders think that the Army brass should be put in front of a firing squad
Oky genius! Let's start from unification of Germany events. What was agreed by German Chancellor US and soviet leaders.
Unification of journey was agreed on one principle principle That Allied forces will not go into the East Germany Later Allied forces went into the East Germany Lithuania Georgia Poland turkey keep extending to their borders.As we all know putin was there in East Germany as kgb official and he is main witness of that agreement when he demands to fullfil that agreement. I believe he as right. You know when nato got into the 🇹🇷 turkey.they blocked black sea for Russian. When nato got into Spain. Nato blocked Chablalter for them. British n French sea was already blocked for them. Soviet or Russian sea as we all know it is frozen for 8 months a year. Biggest country on planet it needs sea routes to trade with world. It is like if I park my car infront of your doorstep for 40 years what will you do..
Now come to Cuban Missile crisis. Do you know why it had happened. Because USA had installed atomic bombs and its misiles defence systems in Turkey and soviet Retaliated with cuban missil installment. When soviet installed those missile near US borders. US started crying like Prostitute.
If we follow the example of cuban missile crisis and amaraicn reaction. Then give right to Russians to defend their mother land when nato keep Extending to their borders on American behalf.
You know what cost soviet paid being Blocked in Turkish spanish franch British waters. They jumped in Afghanistan to have Access to warm waters. They thought if they go to European waters there will be world War 3. They thought Afghanistan n pakistan are much easy targets. Their Misscalculation cost them to lose 12 of its provinces including East Germany.
This time they took this risk to fight with Europe. They know if they did not stop amaraicns in Europe then their end is near as Russian nation.
End of story is with out knowing anything about Global politics. Dont jump in into discussions with harsh words.
Now look into the map how much territory they lost. Orange color they lost the land in green color it was their tread routes . Green color routes are blocked by nato..now they have 1 short route via Afghanistan and Pakistan and here comes removal of Imran khan by Americans. Do you understand what i mean. Same way they killed first pm of Pakistan. He was ready to give tread access to warm waters.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221010-092207_Samsung capture.jpg
    Screenshot_20221010-092207_Samsung capture.jpg
    302.9 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
Forwarded:

I wish every single person in the West would listen to Putin's speech. Obviously, that won't happen so let me summarise as a professional translator for 10+ years. He states, as he has done from the outset, what his intentions and complaints are in the plainest terms possible

Setting aside his brief comments on the recent "referendums", he spends most of his speech discussing the West. His primary complaint isn't NATO expansion, which gets only a cursory mention. The West is greedy and seeks to enslave and colonise other nations, like Russia.
Putin dreams of reinstating russian empire. Which colonises others. russia are the ones now acting like an agressive imperialist colonizer. And against a country that went through the holodomir…..

Russia takes from goebbels playbook. Accuse others that which you are guilty of.


The West uses the power of finance and technology to enforce its will on other nations. To collect what he calls the "hegemon's tax". To this end the West destabilises countries, creates terrorist enclaves and most of all seeks to deprive other countries of sovereignty.
Ukraine was a sovereign state.
Russia guaranteed its security if it gave up nukes…

Also “west” is a almost racist generalisation of what basicaly are dozens of nations.
Far from a simple “hegemon”

Germany and france kept their hands open towards russia…russia refused to take the road of trade and diplomacy.
It is this "avarice" and desire to preserve its power that is the reason for the "hybrid war" the collective West is "waging on Russia". They want us to be a "colony". They do not want us to be free, they want Russians to be a mob of soulless slaves - direct quote.

The rules-based order the West goes on about is "nonsense". Who made these rules? Who agreed to them? Russia is an ancient country and civilization and we will not play by these "rigged" rules. The West has no moral authority to challenge the referendums because it has violated...the borders of other countries. Western elites are "totalitarian, despotic and apartheidistic" - direct quote. They are racist against Russia and other countries and nations. "Russophobia is racism". They discriminate by calling themselves the "civilised world".

They colonised, started the global slave trade, genocided native Americans, pillaged India and Africa, forced China to buy opium through war. We, on the other hand, are proud that we "led" the anti-colonial movement that helped countries develop to reduce poverty and inequality.
More accuse others that of which you are guilty of.
And at best “pot calling kettle black” justification.
They are Russophobic (they hate us) because we didn't allow our country to be pillaged by creating a strong CENTRALISED (emphasis his) state based on Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism. They have been trying to destabilise our country since the 17th century in the Times......of Trouble (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_of_T…). Eventually, they managed to "get their hands on our riches" at the end of the 20th century. They called us friends and partners while pumping out trillions of dollars (his irony game is strong today).

We remember this. We didn't forget. The West claims to bring freedom and democracy to other countries but it's the exact opposite of the truth. The unipolar world is anti-democratic by its very nature. It is a lie. They used nuclear weapons, creating a precedent. They flattened German cities without "any military need to do so". There was no need for this except to scare us and the rest of the world. Korea, Vietnam. To this day they "occupy" Japan, South Korea and Germany and other countries while cynically calling them "allies".

The West has surveillance over the leaders of these nations who "swallow these insults like the slaves they are".

He then talks about bioweapon research (haven't heard about them for a while) and human experiments "including in Ukraine".

The US rules the world by the power of the fist. Any country which seeks to challenge Western hegemony becomes an enemy. Their neocolonialism is cloaked in lies like "containment" of Russia, China and Iran. The concept of truth has been destroyed with fakes and extreme......propaganda(irony game still strong).

You cannot feed your people with printed dollars and social media. You need food and energy. But Western elites have no desire to find a solution to the food and energy crises *they* (emphasis his) created.

They solved the problems at the start of 20c with WW1 and the US established dominance of the world via the dollar as a result of WW2. In the 80s they had another crisis they solved by "plundering our country". Now they want to solve their problems by "breaking Russia".

Russia "understands its responsibility to the international community" and will "do everything to cool the heads of these neocolonials who are destined to fail".

They're crazy. I want to speak to all Russian citizens, do we want to replace mum and dad with parent 1 and 2?

They invented genders and claim you can "transition". Do we want this for our children?

We have a different vision.

They have abandoned religion and embraced Satanism - direct quote.

The world is going through a revolutionary transformation. A multipolar world offers nations freedom to develop as they wish and they make up the majority of the world.

We have many like-minded friends in Western countries. We see and appreciate their support. They are forming liberation, anti-colonial movements as we speak - direct quote. These will only grow.

We are fighting for a fair world for our country. The idea of exceptionalism is criminal and we must turn this shameful page. The breaking of the West's hegemony is INEVITABLE (emphasis his).

There is no going back. We are fighting for our "great (as in big), historic Russia". Our values are (irony game crescendo): love of our fellow man, compassion and mercy.

Truth is with us, Russia is with us.

That's the end of the speech. As I said from day 1, the purpose of what Putin is doing in Ukraine is to throw the West off its pedestal. This isn't about NATO or Ukraine, this is the big play to replace the current world order.

Putin though he could for another crimea 2014 and quickly take whole or half of ukraine into its power. A short “special operation”

When that failed he is now making it seem like they struggle against the entire Nato might. Ofcourse this is to sell the war to internal public and explain why it has run into so many delays and challenges.

Russia elites love spending their billions in the west. Living the luxury life….no “culture war” then…..

It was a deranged..desperate speech really…
 
honestly i don't understand whats the point here , if you are talking about burn mark on the pillar , its top was completely on fire at some time if you mean on top of railroad bridge well it was on fire so its natural it get charred all i see is burn mark on places the fuel split
The top part has a longer burn mark than the lower part if that's from spilling burn fuel, those burn fuel will gather at one spot and drop into the sea, which mean the shape of burn out fuel fire would be in a Funnel Shape, it's not the case here.

The charred part underneath is obviously longer than the top part of the bridge. Which mean the flame are engulfing the lower part than radiate to the top part of the bridge, by the way, fuel fire is flash fire, you don't have a long burn mark if you just leak burning fuel, because burning fuel still a liquid it will move toward the lower center of gravity. It simple don't stay and scotch the area, because the fuel would have flow away
 
Putin dreams of reinstating russian empire. Which colonises others. russia are the ones now acting like an agressive imperialist colonizer. And against a country that went through the holodomir…..

Russia takes from goebbels playbook. Accuse others that which you are guilty of.



Ukraine was a sovereign state.
Russia guaranteed its security if it gave up nukes…

Also “west” is a almost racist generalisation of what basicaly are dozens of nations.
Far from a simple “hegemon”

Germany and france kept their hands open towards russia…russia refused to take the road of trade and diplomacy.

More accuse others that of which you are guilty of.
And at best “pot calling kettle black” justification.


Putin though he could for another crimea 2014 and quickly take whole or half of ukraine into its power. A short “special operation”

When that failed he is now making it seem like they struggle against the entire Nato might. Ofcourse this is to sell the war to internal public and explain why it has run into so many delays and challenges.

Russia elites love spending their billions in the west. Living the luxury life….no “culture war” then…..

It was a deranged..desperate speech really…
So when france is giving freedom to 12 of African countries. You forgetting what Italian milani said about France recently. come on guys how you do these things shamelessly lol
 
Putin dreams of reinstating russian empire. Which colonises others. russia are the ones now acting like an agressive imperialist colonizer. And against a country that went through the holodomir…..

Russia takes from goebbels playbook. Accuse others that which you are guilty of.



Ukraine was a sovereign state.
Russia guaranteed its security if it gave up nukes…

Also “west” is a almost racist generalisation of what basicaly are dozens of nations.
Far from a simple “hegemon”

Germany and france kept their hands open towards russia…russia refused to take the road of trade and diplomacy.

More accuse others that of which you are guilty of.
And at best “pot calling kettle black” justification.


Putin though he could for another crimea 2014 and quickly take whole or half of ukraine into its power. A short “special operation”

When that failed he is now making it seem like they struggle against the entire Nato might. Ofcourse this is to sell the war to internal public and explain why it has run into so many delays and challenges.

Russia elites love spending their billions in the west. Living the luxury life….no “culture war” then…..

It was a deranged..desperate speech really…
Obviously we know your well versed sentiments based on western media propaganda.
 
Fuel tanks don’t explode per se.To get them explode fuels need high oxygen density. What is less likely. The first explosion consumed most of oxygen in the air.
I believe the second explosion was caused by a charge that was attached to the bridge. Or could be a bomb on the train.
if the tankers are filled , very unlikely for them to explode but if its 2/3rd filled and 1/3rd empty then thats an option , we don\t knew if the fuel cargo was tampered with or not
 
So when france is giving freedom to 12 of African countries. You forgetting what Italian milani said about France recently. come on guys how you do these things shamelessly lol
So because france colonised in the past and is mistreating african countries still…that gives russia the right to colonize ukraine?

Weird logic….

Obviously we know your well versed sentiments based on western media propaganda.
I have heard the “anti western” propaganda long enough.

What usa/uk did in past has **** all to do with giving russia a free pass to opress and colonize eastern europe…again…

Read up on holodomir and katyn how “liberating” these sovereign states felt under russian boot.
 
The top part has a longer burn mark than the lower part if that's from spilling burn fuel, those burn fuel will gather at one spot and drop into the sea, which mean the shape of burn out fuel fire would be in a Funnel Shape, it's not the case here.

The charred part underneath is obviously longer than the top part of the bridge. Which mean the flame are engulfing the lower part than radiate to the top part of the bridge, by the way, fuel fire is flash fire, you don't have a long burn mark if you just leak burning fuel, because burning fuel still a liquid it will move toward the lower center of gravity. It simple don't stay and scotch the area, because the fuel would have flow away
I see burn mark only places the tanker above is damaged
I only see burn mark on the pillars and down side of the bridge when the tanker above is damaged
this news from the euro-news show the extent of the fuel leakage better
 
Russia commits further Terrorism in Ukraine


Russia despite being limited in number of cruise missiles decide to use them on random civilian infrastructures of no importance whatsoever instead of military targets.

Typical Russian strategy to attack civilians when faced by a resisting adversary. (Syria,Chechnya,Afghanistan....) to cause terror and surrender while it actualy causes the opposite. The Ukrainians will never bow down.

Hope it causes the west to send much more air defence systems to Ukraine. Shows again the failure of the RuAF as they have to use strategic bombers and cruise missiles to strike "targets" deep into Ukraine.
 
So because france colonised in the past and is mistreating african countries still…that gives russia the right to colonize ukraine?

Weird logic….


I have heard the “anti western” propaganda long enough.

What usa/uk did in past has **** all to do with giving russia a free pass to opress and colonize eastern europe…again…

Read up on holodomir and katyn how “liberating” these sovereign states felt under russian boot.
First return the gold you stolen from liybia very recently and pay the money to African countries for Uranium which worth trillions stolen and still steeling from them. You attacked not long ago on libiya and stolen 700 tone gold alone from lybia and oil money I am not counting yet which is continually being stolen by France....how you guys do these things shamelessly. Russia has no right to attack other countries i agree. But you have no moral to tell the world how they do things.. but I strongly believe russia as every right to defend itself. I am angry on your duble standers. When last week 4 Palestinian kids were killed by Israeli forces. But you talking shit about iranin lady which die under police custody. Come on guys.....
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom