Vergennes
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 8,576
- Reaction score
- 61
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Iraq and liybia were supper rich countries then saudia and Qatar. Go and see those countries are shit whol now after your imposed war.. you still defending attack on Iraq Syria libiya Palestinian Kashmir. That shows how dubleface bc idiot you are.No. America did. Under falsehood of “weapons of mass destruction”.
Countries like germany were opposed.
Western view on american war in iraq was quite negative.
Keep in mind that Saddam was a dictator gassing kurds and attacking kuwait.
Taliban sheltered terrorists after 9-11
The attack was done with minimal civilian casualties. Billions were pumped into state-building, hopsitals, basic infra. Life expectancy grew 10 years during nato was there….
If you want to cry about afghanistan, do so about russias invasion, which actually saw pipukation plummet and millions dead
Another dictator pushed his luck. So some Nato countries took opportunity when he started killing civilians in a civil war.
I preferred they didnt. But small change compared to russia trying to annex ukraine.
“palestine” is peanuts compared to the armenian or bangladesh genocide.
1 month ukraine saw more civilian deaths then 30 years palestine…
You go to 0:13 and you can see the different between the area of undamaged car that was not burn, and the area of undamaged car that burn.to me look all the burn marks are under the damaged tanker
also don't forget one thing , the side of the bridge was not solid it was a metal mesh . when 3-4 tanker damage there is natural that enough fuel spill on the ground and move and some of them pour from that mesh under the bridge
Relatively wealthy with most money in hands of strongman dictator.Iraq and liybia was supper rich county then saudia Qatar. Go and see that countries are shit whol now..
Usa spent tens of billions on humanitarian and rebuild.We dont give any one morality lesson.. as you accepted iraq did not had WMD. When you going compensate them.
Osama used to be (one of the many) mudhjahedeen fighting russia however turned on america and attacked it with disgusting terrorism. Taliban sheltered him so could expect a reaction.Any Afghan was involved in 9/11. Osama used dine in wighthouse. He was the man who made usa solo supper power after defeating soviet in Afghanistan. So talk shit here. We not idiots like many in west. Brain size of chicken
Usa spent money where? Did you ever go to those countries which were destroyed by west. Come on man where you live. Are you living on Mars. Come out on your high horses.Relatively wealthy with most money in hands of strongman dictator.
sect/tribe violence and corruption were heavily ingrained into these societies.
A unstable situation that was temporarily forced together by a dictator
Usa spent tens of billions on humanitarian and rebuild.
They did remove a dictator that gassed his own civilians. And did not annex iraq either.
Osama used to be (one of the many) mudhjahedeen fighting russia however turned on america and attacked it with disgusting terrorism. Taliban sheltered him so could expect a reaction.
War itself had minimal collateral damage and billions were pumped to improve afghan life. My oh my so “evil”
Well, why not ask the russians. They are inventor of thermobombastic rocket truck. Russia army is the only army in the world that uses such cruel weapon.if the tankers are filled , very unlikely for them to explode but if its 2/3rd filled and 1/3rd empty then thats an option , we don\t knew if the fuel cargo was tampered with or not