Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Think the Dutch, the Dane, Spanish, Portugese, Australian, and American already gave them 400 M113 to Ukraine. IIRC. That's probably enough for now. That's like 3 division worth of M113...I mean even Australia and Canada do not have that number in service...@jhungary
Any chance of more M113s for off road to handle the winter? Think the Ukrainians will still be busy.
Think the Dutch, the Dane, Spanish, Portugese, Australian, and American already gave them 400 M113 to Ukraine. IIRC. That's probably enough for now. That's like 3 division worth of M113...I mean even Australia and Canada do not have that number in service...
Still the explosion comes from the right of the lorry, while the train is to the left of the lorry. It is not the train exploding 1-2 seconds after the initial explosion,no i say there was a secondary explosion after the truck exploded when the video switch to the control room monitor you see it . and there is only 1-2sec distance the train driver had no time to stop before the second explosion .
that can mean one thing the train was stationary or stopped one tanker get exploded
now look at the photo you post . it show the burning train is exactly adjacent to were the road bridge is fallen and the lorry exploded , it only mean one thing , the train for some reason was stationary at the time of explosion otherwise before stop it had moved 1-2 hundred meter at least
Nuke doesn't even have to explode , all Russia has to do is tell the Kiev citizens that Russia is going to nuke the city and they should evacuate, you will then get around 2 million people exodus of the city which will block the Ukrainian supply routes and force Ukraine to negotiate.Yes and if a nuke just so happens to explode in Kiev Russians will claim it was an accident.
honestly i don't understand whats the point here , if you are talking about burn mark on the pillar , its top was completely on fire at some time if you mean on top of railroad bridge well it was on fire so its natural it get charred all i see is burn mark on places the fuel splitPetrol, Diesel or any form of liquid follow gravitational pull, if fuel on that train spill over the bridge, they will gather on the edge that closer to the ground, that's because the gravity pull the liquid to the bottom edge. Which mean burn mark on the top side is a lot longer than the burn mark on bottom, and as you can see it is the opposite on the photo, the burn mark underneat the bridge is longer than the burn mark on top. Which mean the undercarriage were burn more than the top, which suggest the flame is under that part of the bridge, instead of on top of that bridge.
You can try that at home, fill a lunch box with water and watch it fill to the rim and spill, when it spills it does not spill along the entire edge of the side of that lunch box, it spills at one point.
look at the video when it cut to security camera on monitor it clearly show a big first explosion and then after 1-2 sec a small second explosion . the first explosion come exactly at were the lorry was . i cant say it was its left or right , how you can tell that ? the second explosion clearly happened out of the field of viewStill the explosion comes from the right of the lorry, while the train is to the left of the lorry. It is not the train exploding 1-2 seconds after the initial explosion,
What caused the second explosion? It can’t be the truck, can it? That would mean the truck exploded twice which is implausible.look at the video when it cut to security camera on monitor it clearly show a big first explosion and then after 1-2 sec a small second explosion . the first explosion come exactly at were the lorry was . i cant say it was its left or right , how you can tell that ? the second explosion clearly happened out of the field of view
the second explosion is probably damaged tankers , nothing else i'm aware of exploded that night . and as the train exactly is adjacent to the place the lorry exploded it show that it was stationary and not moving
probably damaged fuel tanks on the train , maybe a small bomb on the trainWhat caused the second explosion? It can’t be the truck, can it? That would mean the truck exploded twice which is implausible.
Fuel tanks don’t explode per se.To get them explode fuels need high oxygen density. What is less likely. The first explosion consumed most of oxygen in the air.probably damaged fuel tanks on the train , maybe a small bomb on the train
Go and read 1856 event around 3 millones Indians got killed by British forcesI claimed that England did not do anything similar to the Holocaust.
You lying about the number of people starving to death in Iran does not change that.
Claming that 12-15 million Iranians died of starvation during WWII, when the population of Iran was 12-15 million during WWII is ridiculous.
Russian logistics is based on railways, not on trucks.