Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[jhungary]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576899626611134466

Not long now until Ukraine advances on Svatove

I have already predicted that 5 days and 60 pages of post ago......

Ukrainian Flag hoisted over Kup'yans'k-Vuzlovyi​

https://twitter.com/x/status/1574832786258759685

Ukrainian had expanded the beachhead South over East Kupiansk.

For those who do not know, or can't read tactical situation, you need that town to protect the flank of Ukrainian troop moving toward Svatove along P07, my guess is they are going to take Pishchane and Kyslivka next. Then it will start challenging Svatove itself.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576921291663110144

 

[ZeGerman]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576921291663110144

Look at those fascists going to fight for their dictator who likes to play risk.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Look at those fascists going to fight for their dictator who likes to play risk.

They fight for land. Land is wealth. Land rewards you women and offspring. Men fight for land since birth of humanity 200,000 years ago.

 

[ziaulislam]

Russia only has one thing left amd that is Nuclear if they work unlike other Russian systems.

They also have large fleet of high altitude bombers with a lot of dumb bombs and a lot of dumb ICBM.

It may change to Syrian style carnage..if that happens it will be very unpopular at home..

It won't go nuclear it will go carnage first

 

[jhungary]

They also have large fleet of high altitude bombers with a lot of dumb bombs and a lot of dumb ICBM.

It may change to Syrian style carnage..if that happens it will be very unpopular at home..

It won't go nuclear it will go carnage first

Need to be sensible.

If Russia don't want to fly fighter jet into Ukraine, why would they fly High Altitude Bomber into Ukraine? It's more or less suicide if Russia fly those bomber in without taking AIr Superiority or SEAD first. both of which were not done.

On the other hand, Ukraine has been aided by NASAMS and IRIS-T, if they are not doing the carpet bombing at the beginning of the war, there are virtually no chance they are doing it now.

 

[Viet]

Look at those fascists going to fight for their dictator who likes to play risk.

They won’t make far.

Against battle hardened Ukraine army those fresh orcs have no chance.

Ukrainische Soldaten grüßen in der befreiten Stadt Isjum. Bild: LAIF

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576933943240056832

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576936252095737856

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576938806346797056

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576868361757405185

That crowd was bussed in government employees

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

you can do that who care, if its a big deal . i listed all the obligation i believe eu failed , if you can prove me wrong , then do so.and as i said we have a detailed hundred plus page thread in iran section about it , you can go there for studying more

I ask you to take one specific example, show exactly which part of the JPCOA was violated.

Your reply is to list every obligation in the JPCOA.
That is your equivalent of a

Gish Gallop

The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort. It's essentially a conveyor belt-fed version of the on the spot fallacy, as it's unreasonable...

rationalwiki.org

Using such tactics is a clear sign of lack of arguments.

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576887640728576000

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576888512527233026

This Russian Nazi said it was ok to rape 17yo Ukrainian girls because the legal age of consent is 16.

Now she mad

 

[Hack-Hook]

I ask you to take one specific example, show exactly which part of the JPCOA was violated.

Your reply is to list every obligation in the JPCOA.
That is your equivalent of a

Gish Gallop

The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort. It's essentially a conveyor belt-fed version of the on the spot fallacy, as it's unreasonable...

rationalwiki.org

Using such tactics is a clear sign of lack of arguments.

my answer is from that list take one that in practice come in effect not just by name

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576943096545177600

https://twitter.com/x/status/1576941020658294784

 

[khansaheeb]

The ones who should learn are busy buying US franchises and investing in DHA.

Do you blame them?

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

my answer is from that list take one that in practice come in effect not just by name

Nope You have just pulled accusations out of random, without anything verifyable to back them up.