What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

The power in Sweden lies with the parliament, not the government.
The parliament can force any minister to resign by a simple majority vote.
The government can be forced to resign by a simple majority vote.

The Parliament (both house) IS the government, same as Australia. I mean, do you ever have a Prime Minister or Head of State and all the minister that is not from the governing parliament? The Congress is similar to the parliament in Sweden, but we can have a president from one party and both house (House of Red and Senate) controlled by the other, see the impasse there? We have a Democratic President in the US, all Democrats secretary, but a Republican House.......



Which means tbat people think illegal aliens are not a significant problem.
The constitution is amendable, and would be amended if that had highest priority.

Probably you are outside of the US so you wouldn't know. But no, HELL NO.........Constitution cannot be amended willy-nilly by the government, any attempt to amend the Constitution is seen as upsetting the balance, You are not just changing the way immigration behave, you are taking people's right (again, 1, 4, 5, 6 A) from them because of something not related to them. That is a big no-no....Or why do you think the 2A still have not been amended for all that gun violence? It's not like Gun Violence is not in top priority.....

There are two things we don't do in the US unless it is absolutely necessary, raise taxes and amend our constitution.
 
The Zio-Jew banksters have the US by the balls. Any wrong move and they'll force a default causing the demise of the US empire, ready to make way for Israhell. Clown of Kiev is almost ready to depart to Tel Aviv....just needs another half a million Ukrainians dead.


Living in a dream world following loser twitter feeds and then posting them here. How is the demise of US by removal of a speaker suitable for this forum

It’s already illegal it just isn’t enforced by the current administration. Case in point Tesla is being sued by the feds for not hiring illegals, you literally can’t make this clown show up.

Pity Ukraine has to suffer due to europes decades of inaction and funding the very beast that now wages war, but please misdirect to America
Can you two take your informative but irrelevant dialogue elsewhere? Your bromance is wasting the rest of our time on this thread.

Way to play down his following, just more than any other news program on cable. Same could be said about the relevance of anyone on a platform ie any other news host.
Not playing down his following: the fact that he is a liar caused him to get fired. So now the other directionless populace that believed in his lies just follow him on twitter. Fox, the bastion of conservative news doesn't consider him worthy, even for its loyal fan base. Newsmax won't go near him for the same reason.

As for his followers: that tells me they are traitors as they admire the same guy that Russian Govt is often quoting
 
Last edited:
So did Ukraine- Ukraine was setting up NATO grade defense fortifications in Donbass since 2014! GFOH!

what does air superiority have to do with winning wars? westerns swear by it but they've lost many wars while having it, so this is a dead point.

even without Russia going to total war Ukraine still cannot win, so Ukraine is in SERIOUS trouble regardless. Russia will enter total war status when NATO enters the Ukraine conflict with boots or receives a nuclear attack on its homeland.

Disabling the nazi Ukrainian state's threat to Russia - dont you listen to Russian leaders?

because Ukraine keeps crossing new lines, foolishly.

dont worry, IT JUST LIKE **** (said a US judge once)- we dont know what it is, but we know when we see it!
Back to making ignorant statements?

The virtual stalemate you see in Donbas is due to lack of air superiority. Neither Ukraine and nor Russia has the required level of Air Power to soften up enemy positions. Air Power can prevent a situation like this.

US applied its Air Power to devastating effect in World War 2 - a war that concluded with victory of US-led forces in various armed clashes, de-naazification of Germany, and political reboot in Japan.

US applied its Air Power to defeat Soviet Air Force in the Korean War - a war that concluded with victory of US-led forces in various armed clashes and liberation of South Korea from the combined might of China, North Korea, and Soviet Union.

US applied its Air Power to devastating effect in the Vietnam War in 1972 (Operation Linebacker II) - smart munitions were used for the first time in history to destroy high value targets in minutes that withstood dumb bombs otherwise. Vietcong was virtually crippled but Nixon chose to withdraw American troops. Vietcong took 3 years to recover and retake South Korea. This was an American political forfeit.

US applied its Air Power to devastating effect in the Gulf War in 1991 - a war that concluded with victory of US-led forces in various armed clashes and liberation of Kuwait from Iraq.

US applied its Air Power to devastating effect in Yugoslavia in 1999 - a war that concluded with liberation of Kosovo without putting boots on the ground.

US has demonstrated effective applications of Air Power in the recent War On Terror saga as well to defeat a variety of opponents. Al-Qaeda Network was defeated in Tora Bora mountains in Afghanistan in 2002 (Operation Anaconda), Saddam regime was crippled in just 21 days in 2003 (Operation Iraqi Freedom), Qaddafi regime was crippled in Libya without putting boots on the ground (Operation Odyssey Dawn), and ISIL was defeated across Iraq and Syria (Operation Inherent Resolve). This is the first war in which US demonstrated the utility of drones to eliminate terrorists or high value targets without the need to put troops at risk.

Air Power is the KEY to win battles and reduce losses in modern times - a fact that Iranians do not seem to understand. The alternative is to end up fighting like Iran when it was up against Iraq in the 1980s, or like Russians in Ukraine in the present with heavy losses.

Air Power = difference between a superpower and regional power in modern times.

Russia did well in Syria because its target was weak (Syrian rebels lacking in sophisticated equipment and capacity to regroup in another country), and by having an understanding with the US to not topple Assad regime. Prior to this, Russia fought a lengthy war in Chechnya where Russia had to try 2 times to defeat Chechen rebels (first attempt was a miss but second attempt succeeded). Prior to this, Soviet Union existed and the Cold War concluded with its dissolution.

So a country that can actually fight and win wars in modern times is a looser in your worldview? It is strange to see an American citizen having this view. I can imagine a thankless misfit having this view but not an American citizen who is doing well and proud of his country's achievements and contributions to the world in all aspects. I can understand a citizen of an underdeveloped country complaining about his country's faults, but Americans. Sure, US is not perfect (no country is), but its military and technological accomplishments are nothing to scoff at. I can see the obvious even from a distance.
 
SAM is very reliable for missile defence, it's just you have to have tons of them, and really there is no other option than thousands of land based SAMs on watch to defeat mass drone/missile launches of hundreds at a time, day after day.

A long range surface to air missile cheap enough to be fielded by thousands is a need of the day.
Even if they have many SAMs, they don't have enough platforms to shoot down all of them. Especially in saturation attacks as you saw in Crimea with their HQ getting hit. Or the lost of their ship and submarine. I mean you see even on Russian mainland getting hit as well since they can't cover all the territory. And thats not even including the platforms getting destroyed. If it was a reliable missile defense, why does Iranians trust it so much to the point they have their military locations in deep mountains for example? You can't rely on it only.
 
Depends on how you see it.

Ukraine had taken Robodyne, which mean they control the road in and out of Tokmak, to this, Ukraine has been trying to degrade the situation around Tokmak for months, looks like they are trying to repeat what happened to Kherson in Tokmak. Which is just inside the 40 click radius.

It really depends on whether or not Russia can counterattack that area, otherwise I am going to repeat what I said same time last year, Russia probably cannot hold on to Tokmak after the winter, and if they lose Tokmak, then that's very bad news for the Russian in 2024.
Just saw a video recently of Ukrainians targeting Russian vehicles around Tokmak now. Its something we mentioned about taking Tokmak and Melitipol as well.
 
The Parliament (both house) IS the government, same as Australia. I mean, do you ever have a Prime Minister or Head of State and all the minister that is not from the governing parliament? The Congress is similar to the parliament in Sweden, but we can have a president from one party and both house (House of Red and Senate) controlled by the other, see the impasse there? We have a Democratic President in the US, all Democrats secretary, but a Republican House.......
The parliament has eight parties and a coalition of 3-4 parties is needed.
Before last election we had a situation with 174 MPs for the left block and 174 MPs for the right block, and an MP that went maverick after being ejected from the communist party.

Minority governments are not uncommon in this situation.
The King is the Head of State but he is forbidden to engage in politics.

The only requirement for the Prime Minister is that he is a Swedish citizen, and does not have a second job. The candidate for Prime Minister is suggested by the speaker. Then there is a vote in the parliament. Unless there is a majority vote against the candidate, the candidate becomes elected. So You can have 174 votes for, 1 against and 174 abstained and still get elected.

Congress has power over the President, because they can impeach him for wearing a tan suite. They do need qualified majority in the Senate for impeachment to affect anything.
SCOTUS has also power over the President, since the Constitution names certain crimes which would block perpetrators from holding office.



Probably you are outside of the US so you wouldn't know. But no, HELL NO.........Constitution cannot be amended willy-nilly by the government, any attempt to amend the Constitution is seen as upsetting the balance, You are not just changing the way immigration behave, you are taking people's right (again, 1, 4, 5, 6 A) from them because of something not related to them. That is a big no-no....
I know it is close to impossible to amend the constitution.
There is no shortcut here. If you want to be able to identify illegal aliens, then you need to keep track of everyone.


Or why do you think the 2A still have not been amended for all that gun violence? It's not like Gun Violence is not in top priority.....
Because the constitution makes it possible for a few percent to block the will of a huge majority.
There are two things we don't do in the US unless it is absolutely necessary, raise taxes and amend our constitution.
The way it works, You cannot do things even if it is absolutely neccessary.
 
Last edited:
LOL where's the Russian winning crowds now?

Good the war continue unimpeded
And thank you Iran too for continuing the war. 😁
 
1696571271408.png


Interesting proposal

Margarita Simonjan, Putin’s girlfriend and chief speaker of state propaganda broadcaster RT, means Russia can send a nuclear ultimatum to the west by dropping a thermonuclear bomb on Russia.
She means Putin can nuke Siberia because it is no man’s land, so no problem.
 
Back
Top Bottom