Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SAM is not really a reliable Anti-Air Platform, and NATO has been in a way progress to dismantle SAM network, the entire NATO Air Offensive Structure is designed to do this, from decoy to electronic jamming. Read Operation Bolo and what Raven did with Iraqi Air Defence.
NATO nation do not depends on SAM and instead their function in NATO country are there the plug the capability gap.
But as I said, Ukraine is not NATO, so they don't play the same game we play, and long story short, it would be impossible for Ukraine to gain Air Superiority over Russia in any practical way
Again, I will say refer to how USAF uses its RF-111A and how Operation Bolo works in Vietnam.SAM is very reliable, it's just you have to have tons of them, and really there is no other option than thousands of land based SAMs on watch to defeat mass drone/missile launches of hundreds at a time, day after day.
They already did it, centuries ago.US Should start annexing some of Mexico's territory if they don't help to stop this. Start just by annexing a little territory to send the message?
The question of the possibility of the Russian army using nuclear weapons in Ukraine is constantly being raised online. There are quite a lot of supporters and opponents of this action; there is still no clear answer on this issue. Russian Army General Konstantin Pulikovsky gave an answer about the likelihood of using nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The video has been shortened. Subtitles YouTube
The question of the possibility of the Russian army using nuclear weapons in Ukraine is constantly being raised online. There are quite a lot of supporters and opponents of this action; there is still no clear answer on this issue. Russian Army General Konstantin Pulikovsky gave an answer about the likelihood of using nuclear weapons in Ukraine. The video has been shortened. Subtitles YouTube
Once you formed a government, the government have absolute power to exercise their policy. This is not the case in the US, case in point, Democrats are in power but since the house of rep was taken by GOP in a minimal margin (I think it's 8 or 9) democrats can't push policy into the congress without the other party agreed.
As I said, even 28 or 30 member of congress can block a bill, that is what I meant by US government not having absolute power.
Way to play down his following, just more than any other news program on cable. Same could be said about the relevance of anyone on a platform ie any other news host.Quoting the fired unemployed guy whose only relevence to the world is his x feed. Even Fox founds his babbling lies too expensive
Actually he did, remain in Mexico comes to mind as many other deals he made. Click on my stats posted above.Well Trump didn't do much in curbing illegal immigration either. I wish he did. Also need to curb H1B, continuation of H1Bs in high numbers makes Americans less employable and they don't acquire the skills they need to.
Well we can argue back and forth but illegal immigration to America is at record levels, as shown by the apprehension data posted and frankly watching any videos of the current status of sanctuary cities. If apprehensions are up one can assume immigration is up, this is simple statistics. Trump exercised record enforcement while joe doesn’t enforce any laws. So the inverse should be true, apprehensions should have been at records previously and near all time lows now.It's not about party.......It's about the government have absolute power.
Once you formed a government, the government have absolute power to exercise their policy. This is not the case in the US, case in point, Democrats are in power but since the house of rep was taken by GOP in a minimal margin (I think it's 8 or 9) democrats can't push policy into the congress without the other party agreed.
As I said, even 28 or 30 member of congress can block a bill, that is what I meant by US government not having absolute power.
Again, it does not necessarily mean the illegal immigration is down, it just meant the apprehension number is low, it could well be they didn't catch that many. It does not reflect anything about the true number, the true number could be way up, but if they didn't report or catches these illegal aliens, it would still have a low apprehension rate.
It's like saying arrest is down so crime is down, it is not necessarily the case here. As I said there are no factual or referential figure reliable enough to say illegal immigration is down.
It's against the constitution for anyone to do the 3 things I highlighted. It's protected by 1st, 4th, 5th and 6th amendment. Especially National ID card, the issue with green card is already controversy. It would probably trigger riot second to taking out 2A right.
Europe got deceived by a Russian trap of dependence on Russian energy.
Europe has also gotten deceived by the Chinese trap of dependence on Chinese manufacturing.
How China Cut Off One of Ukraine's Most Important Weapons
In July, China introduced export controls, which went into effect on September 1, on certain types of drones and equipment in order to safeguard "national security and interests." At the time, observers said the restrictions were a possible response to the trade war with the United States as Washington has tried to stop Beijing from accessing critical technologies such as next-generation semiconductors.
A report by The New York Times, published over the weekend, confirmed that China's export controls instead had the effect of stopping Ukrainian forces from accessing commercial drones and drone equipment. The paper's analysis of trade data and interviews with Ukrainian drone makers and suppliers revealed that Chinese companies had cut back on the sale of drones and drone parts.
China's export controls were creating hurdles for Ukraine, which received $200,000 worth of drones from Chinese companies between January and June this year, according The Times. Russia received $14.5 million in direct drone sales from Chinese companies during the same period, the report said.
How China cut off one of Ukraine's most important weapons
China is using "lawfare" to enable Russia's war efforts in Ukraine.www.newsweek.com
Gut China of European manufacturing. Bring those jobs to Europe and not to another place that would be used in 10 years for the ruin of Europe.
China is not your friend. China is Europe's enemy. Europe was sold a bill of lies that if Europe accepts making the Chinese rich with European investments and jobs creation in China, then Europe would win with peace and prosperity.
Except Europe was not told that China would stab Europe in the back as Chinese cheer for the demise of Europe.
Europe is going to invest tens or hundreds of billions in China in the next decade. Once Russia invaded and China supported Russia, that should have been the end of investment, jobs, manufacturing in China. Europe should have done a total recall. US would have followed the European lead. China would have been done. As supply chains were redirected from Europe and Northern USA with jobs going to China year after year. Supply chains would have returned to North America and Europe. This could have been easily done, as jobs vanished from Rust Belt cities and states, China would have seen their industries vanish in the same duration. China would be finish, Europe would have economic and military security.