Hassan Al-Somal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 6,825
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know that most Iraqis got killed by OTHER Iraqis and their foreign support elements?
What do you think who killed the most civilians in Afghanistan?
(Neo)Taliban did most killing, followed by corrupt Afghan "Army".
American/Israeli/Western (and all other) influences are only a catalysator in these Muslims killing Muslims cases.
Saddam did surpress the Iran-loving Shia and ALL (no matter which religious group/sect etc.) who opposed him.
YES he give stability.
YES Iraq was, as a state unity BETTER under him.
But then, you can't make everything right for people.
Shias kissed US soldiers hand first, later they misused their new might which Americans gave them, killing Sunni Muslims only because they can and were on a bloodthirsty revenge vendetta.
So, pre-ISIS and ISIS came to the rotten core which was left of a stable but Saddam surpressed Iraq.
Same like in Syria.
Western/Western alligned and Muslim powers started to work as a catalysator...
Sadly that's Realpolitik but always funny that only cherry picking muh evil West.
You should be honored that I even bothered to reply you. I am usually not very patient with ignorant morons stuck in the early 2000's in mindset.What are you in diapers? Who talks like this? You have no sense and no life and worse no knowledge of military affairs or doctrine.
No sensical point to push back on other than random teenage memes like 'pigeon internet'.
I like China's economic prowess and the fact that the counterbalance that China can provide. What I don't like are the millions of idiots like you floating around claiming China is so grand supreme and so outstanding that it belongs on its own planet. Nobody from any country is going to boast that kind of BS (be it from Israel, an Arab Country , Pakistan or all).
Now you go figure out why Chinese were paying people to teach them how to land.
Thanks for confirming your stupidity.And Chinese still can't field a carrier strike group launch and recovery at night. So nothing has changed. The fact that those pilots taught you how to land in broad daylight, thats amazing. I wonder how many other former military people are teaching Chinsese military doctrine.
You'd like that wouldn't you?And the best pilot got the Golden Shower.
Let me use this old Soviet adage to make it clear:What part of Iran's weaponry supplies to Russia took place prior to the start of the current conflict is so hard for you to comprehend?
Moreover, when it comes to which party is the aggressor: not only had Russia recognized the independence of the Donbas republics after the regime in Kiev violated the international Minsk treaties by initiating armed attacks on them; but Moscow and the republics were linked by military cooperation agreements. They requested military aid from Russia. To Moscow this implied a legal duty to assist them.
Either way the quoted contention is baseless because even if Russia is considered the aggressor, Iranian transfer of arms and/or military technology happens to predate the war.
Iran has observed neutrality in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Ukraine on the other hand claimed responsibility for a failed drone attack in Iran, which represents an act of war. This means Kiev launched war against Iran.
From this point on, Iran is allowed to retaliate militarily against Ukraine. In perfect legality. Nobody will be in a position to moan if cost-effective high precision missiles looking amazingly similar to Iranian made ones start raining down on Ukrainian positions by the hundreds. Iran will not be attacking Ukraine in this case. She will be defending from Ukrainian aggression.
So if you steal a car, crash it and leaves and noone can trace to You, You are not a car thief? Think Again…that explain all this war from both side
wrong proof is essential and as you can't prove it , then Iran did not do that , but aide to Zelensky admitted their involvement in Isfahan failure so here Ukraine is aggressor .
Where in International Law do You find ”non-neutral” countries.its not applicable because nowhere in that law allowed the aggression of a non neutral country . more importantly , the law is supersede by the laws that come after it , namely UN resolution and charter and according to them you only can attack a country if UNSC allow it . now go and get that permission from UNSC if you can
That does not change the position of Iran.for years we cried that UNSC have become a useless toy in the hand of the VETO right owner and nobody cared because it suited them . now you can reap the fruit of not hearing our warnings
Yes Russia sells more than oil but oil/gas exports make up 60 percent of Russia total exports. Targeting those hydrocarbons make sense. Also, the West squeeze the other 40 percent they sanction Russia’s gold, diamond, and other minerals. The near total import sanctions come on top.Yes, Russians can sell more that just their oil. It's good you brought this up as most don't notice that.
On other hand, who will be buying that.
It's notable Putin started the sell with his Yuan holdings, out of all things. Is he thinking he does not have much time left to use them?
It depends on how far stretching the context, not definition, of 'advisor'. If I am with you at the front line and point you to where to shoot, what does that make me? Does it matter if I use my finger or the radio to guide you? It is a grey area.An advisor would not count as a Mercenary Since they would fail (b) and probably (d) as well.