What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

By your logic that the majority of Syrian Muslims should be GRATEFUL to US for supporting them against the Communist dictator Al-Asad. But again we see that Syrian Muslims (i.e. Muslim Brotherhood & al-Qaeda and Turkish backed Muslim rebels) all are Ungrateful towards US. And it happens only due to religious differences whatever favour US do to them.

What a bunch of confused words you write !

1. Since when did Syrian Muslims become Al Qaeda and "Muslim" Brotherhood ? Here is Bashar's father Hafiz speaking in 1982 after Syria defeated NATO-backed "Muslim" Brotherhood's terrorism in a six-year war. Listen to his words, they are educating :
Much of the Syrian armed forces and administration is composed of Muslims. They are proper Muslims, rational Muslims, opposite to the agents of the Crusaders of NATO in form of "M"B, AQ, Taliban, Jemah "Islamiya", Dudayev Battalion etc who kill and maim actual Muslims on behalf of NATO.

2. Since when are the "Syrian" "moderate" "rebels" ungrateful to the American establishment ? Here is American senator John McCain meeting with Al Qaeda and "Muslim" Brotherhood people in Syria ( illegally of course ) in 2013 :
steve-benen7E07F221-DE96-29AF-E014-621A1014F410.jpg


3. I am a Communist and from all accounts the Baath movement headed by Bashar al Assad is not a Communist movement but an intermediate version called Socialist. I and a Communist leader here in my city had a discussion about this, not about Syria but about Saddam's Iraqi Baath government suppressing the Iraqi Communists.

@SalarHaqq, can you please add to my words for our Irani ( really ? ) friend ?
 
What a bunch of confused words you write !

1. Since when did Syrian Muslims become Al Qaeda and "Muslim" Brotherhood ? Here is Bashar's father Hafiz speaking in 1982 after Syria defeated NATO-backed "Muslim" Brotherhood's terrorism in a six-year war. Listen to his words, they are educating :
Much of the Syrian armed forces and administration is composed of Muslims. They are proper Muslims, rational Muslims, opposite to the agents of the Crusaders of NATO in form of "M"B, AQ, Taliban, Jemah "Islamiya", Dudayev Battalion etc who kill and maim actual Muslims on behalf of NATO.

2. Since when are the "Syrian" "moderate" "rebels" ungrateful to the American establishment ? Here is American senator John McCain meeting with Al Qaeda and "Muslim" Brotherhood people in Syria ( illegally of course ) in 2013 :
steve-benen7E07F221-DE96-29AF-E014-621A1014F410.jpg


3. I am a Communist and from all accounts the Baath movement headed by Bashar al Assad is not a Communist movement but an intermediate version called Socialist. I and a Communist leader here in my city had a discussion about this, not about Syria but about Saddam's Iraqi Baath government suppressing the Iraqi Communists.

@SalarHaqq, can you please add to my words for our Irani ( really ? ) friend ?

If you are a communist, then I need not to reply to you, as I was addressing only religious Muslims and not the communists.
 
If you are a communist, then I need not to reply to you, as I was addressing only religious Muslims and not the communists.

:lol: A few hundred thousand Syrian Muslims and non-Muslim have been killed by those very fake-religious "Muslims" whom NATO supports and here you are telling me grandly that you won't reply to me ?
 
:lol: A few hundred thousand Syrian Muslims and non-Muslim have been killed by those very fake-religious "Muslims" whom NATO supports and here you are telling me grandly that you won't reply to me ?

Why are you talking to me on this subject? Instead of me, ask this question to your own fellow Muslim members of this forum who supported the rebel Muslims in Syria against the Zandeeq Al-Asad (according to them).
 
Why are you talking to me on this subject? Instead of me, ask this question to your own fellow Muslim members of this forum who supported the rebel Muslims in Syria against the Zandeeq Al-Asad (according to them).

Those "Syrian" "rebels" are anti-Islam. As for those PDF members you refer to, well, forum rules prevent me from saying certain things to them. :)

Also, it was you I think who started on this subject.
 
Interesting facts about Ukraine

Ukraine army with 38,000 women has the highest number of female in service in armed forces.

One is the female sharpshooter “Hexe”, her specialty: 800m distance kill.

 
Why you are asking these two nato bots? Do you really think, they know it? :lol:
Probably because stupid people don't know there are something called Open-Source information. And cannot connect the dot that once a missile is fired, it will be seen all over the world. You cannot hide a Cruise Missile or Ballistic Missile being fired and exploded. It's not like they can just disappear out of thin air once they are fired

But then who am I talking to? You probably are even below this level.

How many Russian cruise/ballistic missiles have been fired at Ukraine now?

@jhungary
@gambit
This is a very complex question.

Do you count repurposed S-300 missile as Cruise/Ballistic missile? Because 80% of the missile fired since June is S-300 or another repurposed Air-Air Missile.

If you just counted Ballistic Missile and Cruise missile (like Kaliber), then the number have not changed much since last time It is estimated slightly over 100 of such missiles were fired since May, but if you count S-300 and other missile as well, that number swell to closer to 800
 
@SalarHaqq, can you please add to my words for our Irani ( really ? ) friend ?

Well, I'd suggest not to take the thread off topic. And I seriously doubt that the user is Iranian. Concerning the user's objection let me just counter by saying, as if the US regime has ever lost sleep due to its useful idiots being "ungrateful": they're firmly in America's pocket and can't do a thing against US interests anyway so Washington couldn't care less what they think of America deep down. Also terrorist attacks against the west have been false flags or engineered ones, carried out with or without the participation of these same patsies (Operation Gladio 2.0). Once they're no longer of any use to Uncle Sam, they're simply disposed of (talk of backstabbing or abandoning partners, a US regime specialty). Also if I may, I'd recommend ignoring certain apologists of western regimes on here. It's not as if their rhetoric will affect Russian victory on the battlefield, nor the definitive removal of a major NATO asset from Moscow's immediate vicinity. Let them. Most of the time their posts aren't worthy of your response.
 
Last edited:

That was an old technique for the gun ship jock so they don't get shot down.

If you are firing at an inclined angle, the rocket falls off before it reached your intended target, and it is highly inaccurate.

1. I might get banned again for daring to correct the great JHungary but during the early days of the war the NATO propagandists here ( @Messerschmitt, @F-22Raptor and co. ) used to say the Russian helicopter pilots were scared to fire rockets from a lateral position ( didn't want to attract ground fire - but what's wrong with that ? ) hence they fired nose-up. But as our humanitarian, JHungary, himself says even the Americans did that.

2. Nice to know of the helicopter MLRS technique called Cabrage.
 
6otxpk.jpg



So 12 HIMARS are going to hold back the entire Russian army, after Russia uses their air force to hunt and destroy the HIMARS.
Russia failed to attain air dominance in ukraine. As such these Himars have been operating almost uncontested.
Fueled by USA intel they have been able to strike some vulnerable targets.

Ofcourse its the 40.000 army that is entrenched with plenty of regular soviet material that is holding the russians off. These Himars just hell even the odds
Europe needs tens of thousands of tanks, artillery, IFV, more air power, more air defense, more anti-tank, more nukes.
Why? After ukraine russia had little offensive capacity left. EU air power is more then capable, and we have nukes.

Spending is set to double. Lets not overdo it however…
The US solution to each problem: sell more HIMARS. As in sell/send dozens of HIMARS to defend Europe. Nobody sees a problem with this.
Few dozen Himars is a great addition to the army. Especially considering their proven effectiveness against the russian army
 
1. I might get banned again for daring to correct the great JHungary but during the early days of the war the NATO propagandists here ( @Messerschmitt, @F-22Raptor and co. ) used to say the Russian helicopter pilots were scared to fire rockets from a lateral position ( didn't want to attract ground fire - but what's wrong with that ? ) hence they fired nose-up. But as our humanitarian, JHungary, himself says even the Americans did that.

2. Nice to know of the helicopter MLRS technique called Cabrage.
How is it wrong for what I said?

Are you saying just because American pilot is American, they don't get afraid of SAM? Dude, in Iraq, we grounded all gunship if there is a loose stinger missile on the street. This is what we called "Precautionary" method.

And with Russian pilot doing that, that mean they are afraid of being shot down by the ground fire (SAM or small arms). And that's a fact, whether or not you are American, Russian or Martian.

Dude, this is the reason you got banned, for being a condescending poo-poo head, not because of you challenging me.
 
How is it wrong for what I said?

Are you saying just because American pilot is American, they don't get afraid of SAM? Dude, in Iraq, we grounded all gunship if there is a loose stinger missile on the street. This is what we called "Precautionary" method.

And with Russian pilot doing that, that mean they are afraid of being shot down by the ground fire (SAM or small arms). And that's a fact, whether or not you are American, Russian or Martian.

No, you are not wrong, on this one at least.

Dude, this is the reason you got banned, not because you challenge me.

Please check with a PDF staff member called Amaa'n. He was probably the one to ban me for "Repeated violations".
 
Back
Top Bottom