Okay, can Hezbollah survive another "victory" like this? I don't think so. Another "victory" and Lebanon collapses.
Lebanon is unstable, people hold hostages in the banks because their money is locked every day.
"Non existent" lol, like when the Shiites tried to enter a Christian neighbourhood and met with sniper fire that killed 7 of them? There are people that wait until the perfect moment to overthrow Hezbollah.
Wishful overly optimistic thinking, currently many western countries are struggling, you think Lebanon which is already in a pit will recover? Let alone recover before the conflict with Israel?
Hezbollah is stronger than ever before? All of Hezbollah's weapons have been countered. ATGMs? Trophy APS have been mounted on all Israeli Merkavas and Namer APCs.
Drones? Israeli electronic warfare is the best in the world.
Rockets and missiles? Iron Beam basically nullifies them at a true fraction of the cost but isn't mass produced yet, up until then, the Iron Dome, David's Sling, Barak 8 and Arrow will give the Israeli air force and artillery the crucial time to take out Hezbollah's missile threats, all of that is if Israel doesn't make a preemptive strike that sends Lebanon back into the stone age and flattens every Shia village and neighborhood all across Lebanon.
Israel's goal wasn't to eradicate Hezbollah, it was to stop Hezbollah's rockets. And that succeeded for the last 16 years.
Hezbullah is not Lebanon, that is where you're making a mistake.
Hezbullah can absolutely survive, and they can absolutely survive a collapse of the Lebanese state and they're a religious organization first and foremost.
Also, I didn't say that Christian militias are nonexistent, I said Israeli allies among them are.
You also say that Hezbullah's weapons have been countered, but that is idiotic thinking. "Counters" are not foolproof, and technological superiority does not mean victory. EW is also not foolproof, ask the Russians.
Also, Iron beam has never been tested outside of actual controlled environments, we don't know know how effective it even is.
Winograd report pretty much spells out what Israel's aims were. The initial air campaign was to stop the rocket attack, which ended up being a complete failure, because they didn't stop shit. Then Israel sent in ground forces which expected an easy victory, but ended up facing heavy resistance.
You list off system, but the honest truth is that none of them are 100% fool proof.
You laugh, but you can't laugh away reality. In some ways, you're as bad as the Iranian propagandists on PDF.
Hezbollah is actually weaker than ever before.
As I mentioned, Israel countered every weapon they have. Lebanon is politically dividend more than ever, they had thousands of casualties in Syria and even more injured, and don't count that as experience since all that experience is worthless, they would be facing an enemy with air superiority, massively upgraded surveillance capability and way bigger armed drone fleet, way more standoff weapons, counter artillery radars linked with HIMARS type MLRS (PULS family) and precision guided 155mm shells for <5 minutes kill chain, the tanks they will be facing wouldn't be T55s operated by goat herders but Merkava Mk4s and Namer/Namera with Trophy APS and new modern systems interlinked with a new BMS that's installed on every Israeli vehicle and platoon, suicide drones, signal jamming, the destruction of every power plant in Lebanon and more.
Israel's army in 2006 is a shadow of Israel's military today. Israel prepared itself for 16 years, adjusted its tactics and technology. Meanwhile Hezbollah remains the same, with the addition of easily encountered drones.
And Hezbullah of 2006 is a shadow of Hezbullah of today.
What are you talking about. You're listing off system as if you think those alone will win the war.
They faced an enemy with an air force in 2006, and the air force ended up doing little to no damage them them, and only ended up bombing civilian apartments.
Israel had an overwhelming advantage against Hezbullah I'm 2006, and still fucked up.
Why do people like you never understand militias and insurgents can suffer a million casualties, and be just fine?
The taliban in Afghanistan suffered between 30,000 to 100,000 casualties, and guess what? They won.
Dude, stop, you aren't gonna win this argument.