RAW has established $500 million special cell to sabotage CPEC: CJCSC

[Zen0]

Another day another conspiracy

 

[Sucha Kuggu]

wow India is rich.

wait till I let the Afghans know you got moneeeyyyyyyyyyy

Its their third generation now, most of them are now seasoned for such offers and "act" accordingly. Earlier It was USSR and US and now India.

 

[Awan68]

Read the title & cry on.. Mr Reference
You have consumed the same way your govt wanted too..
By going with the trend of your economy it will be heard more in future.

i pray u move on from "cry on"

 

[El Sidd]

Its their third generation now, most of them are now seasoned for such offers and "act" accordingly. Earlier It was USSR and US and now India.

well after so many years of civil war it is not something out of the ordinary

 

[Ajaxpaul]

Anything happens to the CPEC...Voila, we have a scapegoat, India.

500 million is so low considering we are sabotaging a 100 billion dollar project.

Now the public of pakistan is satisfied after knowing the exact amount india allocates for disrupting CPEC.

Lol

 

[Sugarcane]

When Indian proxies are attacking every kind of targets in Pakistan then why our agencies are sitting idle, every Indian and Indian project along with NDS in Afghanistan are legitimate targets and must be attacked disproportionately.

 

[Sully3]

Fantastic, India should play the role of an enemy to best of its capability.
The Best part is empowering Afghanistan. A stable Afghanistan is threat to Pakistan since they dont accept the international line.

Indias card is Afghanistan, but Pakistans best card is China so when China and Pakistan bring war to India at a time and place of its choosing it will dismantle the indian state from north to south.

That war is coming the question is India ready for it.

 

[protest]

India is already playing the role as you described but the part regarding empowering Afghanistan is bit incorrect rather one can like Doval, will fight Pakistan till last Afghan. India's presence in Afghanistan is actually destabilizing it more than any progress for peace. The same is well understood now and therefore, just read that US de-linked LeT from Haqqani Network meaning, India is merely using Afghanistan for own interest while compromising US.

Delinking might be to stop Pakistanis from whining. Afterall they have to sell the counter measures to hawkish Pakistanis. But secretly America would still insist on acting against LET. If and when America stops catering to Indian needs, LET will not be in their sanctioned list, India would have no influence in Afghanistan, both of which hasn't happened.

Indias card is Afghanistan, but Pakistans best card is China so when China and Pakistan bring war to India at a time and place of its choosing it will dismantle the indian state from north to south.

That war is coming the question is India ready for it.

China will never go to war with India because its not in its interest. Even if Pakistan goes to war, China will just be bystander.

 

[BATMAN]

What a waste of money!!!

No its not, with investment of $500 they make lots of profit:
1- They keep foreigners and their companies away from Pakistan. This means cost of travelling to Pakistan is more than twice than India.
2- More companies come to India to hire labor. This means more technology transfer and investment of $ trillions
3- India get $billions of sympathy aid
4- Restriction in travelling of Pakistanis, increase in cost of travelling for Pakistan
5- Cost of living in Pakistan increased due to increased security measures
6- Pakistan's talented people are at risk of target killing
7- Having various politicians and bureaucrats in pocket means, India can block Pakistan's water without Pakistan taking any concrete measures, plus many other privileges and covers
8- Last but not least, India has earned $trillions of trillions in past 15 years by selling drugs to Afghans

There's no fix for Pakistan other than all out war. Here India always manage to divert serious situation, using back channel diplomacy.

 

[The Eagle]

Delinking might be to stop Pakistanis from whining. Afterall they have to sell the counter measures to hawkish Pakistanis. But secretly America would still insist on acting against LET. If and when America stops catering to Indian needs, LET will not be in their sanctioned list, India would have no influence in Afghanistan, both of which hasn't happened.

Speaking of whining, US pays no heed to India. Yet, Indians knows the secrets and all fairy tales. What a way of discussion, though.

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Fantastic, India should play the role of an enemy to best of its capability.
The Best part is empowering Afghanistan. A stable Afghanistan is threat to Pakistan since they dont accept the international line.

and Stable pakistan is a threat to India.

 

[Mr.Nair]

Delinking might be to stop Pakistanis from whining. Afterall they have to sell the counter measures to hawkish Pakistanis. But secretly America would still insist on acting against LET. If and when America stops catering to Indian needs, LET will not be in their sanctioned list, India would have no influence in Afghanistan, both of which hasn't happened.



China will never go to war with India because its not in its interest. Even if Pakistan goes to war, China will just be bystander.

Majority of chinese oil supply line pass through Indian ocean, why should they need a mess with India for the sake of pakistan !

 

[protest]

Speaking of whining, US pays no heed to India. Yet, Indians knows the secrets and all fairy tales. What a way of discussion, though.

But they listen to Pakistan? But you haven't answered my question. Why would America put LET in their sanctioned list when it has no direct impact because of it.

 

[The Eagle]

But they listen to Pakistan?

Diplomacy is the keyword here.

But you haven't answered my question. Why would America put LET in their sanctioned list when it has no direct impact because of it.

The answer is already given by US that why & how even when and all you need to ask about aftermath and question India. Did you check secdefence tweet with the sane news? Search is a good thing though.

 

[Jungibaaz]

Are you suggesting Pakistan has no role in Afghans instability ?

Or are you suggesting that Pakistan is willing to contribute to have stable govt. in Afghanistan?
In anycase Pakistan seems to be getting a fencing done across the afghan Border that will limit some freedom to insurgents in Afghanistan. I see that as a loss to support of Afghan Taliban in long run. Boiling pot suits India, and a stable one away from Insurgents even better.

I made no mention of Pakistan's role. But I'll go into that later. First of all, what you think a stable government is and what you think instability is when it comes to Afghanistan is probably mostly wrong anyway. A stable Afghanistan from our perspective is one that can enforce governance across most of Afghanistan, not be actively contested by one group or another, and most importantly would at the very least limit stability to the South and Eastern regions that border us.

Indians, Americans, most Westerners and other have no clue about Afghanistan, truly. You probably still think all this conflict is about is pro-Western democratic Afghan factions who formed the government post-9/11 vs extremist groups, taliban and others with Pakistan's support. Respectfully, this is probably the extent of your analysis. I'm sorry to say it's a completely useless analysis. If you take away the US, NATO, Pakistan, Iran, India and other foreign elements, Afghanistan's current conflict is really no different to that of the 90s. The current Kabul regime was made with the remnant of the Northern Alliance with a band of other aligned and opportunistic war lords and drug lords. In part, some of these people attempted to rule Afghanistan post-Najibullah but weren't up to the task. That was the first civil war. The second civil war saw the rise of the Taliban and they fought some of these elements, and won. Pakistan most certainly assisted them and other factions, but suffice it to say we see the exact same conflict today.

If you think the Taliban can be defeated, you're dreaming. If you think the current deadlock can be broken, you're dreaming. And by deadlock, I am referring to the Kabul regime + allies vs the Taliban, the taliban rule in many places, and the Kabul regime rule in many places, current zones of conflict have contested control, and the deadlock is that neither side seems to be able to overcome the other. However, the current Afghan government is unsustainable, it can't last on its own, it can barely hold its own against the talibs despite all the support in the world from powerful nations.

So the three endgame scenarios are as I've described them, either the allies lose interest and eventually draw down from Afghanistan and then the Kabul regime is in trouble, or until that day war continues ad nauseam (this is what I define as instability), or there's a political settlement reconciling anti government elements including the taliban.

As for the fence, it suits our needs well, a porous border has been extremely damaging. But whatever the situation, fence or no fence, what Pakistan does isn't so relevant as what goes on in Afghanistan itself. Pakistan can't decide the endgame scenarios as I listed them above, it can only act once either has been activated.