Somehow not everyone here think as you? Of course, not everybody will think the same way on anything. Don't expect uiversal acceptance of ANY idea. Not everybody thinks the sme as you either. That is why politics is always a compromise of differing interest groups.we all want our state united,No, not all. There have been and are lots of people who want a separate Telengana. Agitation for the same has been going on since 1969. People have immolated themselves for that, and an entire political party has been formed with that sole agenda. even in telangana not many are interested in splitting state its all a blunder done by PC Chidu and congress,Not at all. Demands for Telengana have been going on since Chiddu was a little boy. Make no mistake, the demand for a state has come from the grassroots level, not from any person or two at the top.Why do you think having smaller states means good governance?Oh, there are several reasons, too numerous to go into here. I will mention the most obvious ones. It is accepted political wisdom, and taught in every political science class. For one thing, smaller state means more administration , and more representation. Each legislative assembly represents the will of a smaller number of people, and therefore represents it better. Each state administration (bureucracy, police, tax collection and all other executive functions) caters to a smaller number of people, and therefore will be more efficient. Decision making will be more grassroots, and the people in the govt will be more in touch with the people on the street. Heck, I can keep putting out reasons all day. Think about this - why did we decide to have state govts at all, instead of one govt at the center? Because the more localized governance is, the more efficient it will be. Local concerns can be addressed faster and better. Why were the largest states like UP, Bihar and MP split, and why are they all the better for it?Why because some people are sore they didnt get 10k jobs for them we have to be split?you look at rhetoric of TRS, its on borderline insanity.Were we doing bad before? before congress came into power we were leading in best states development index with IT and other industries.So what was the need for more better governance?We wiped out maoists in APThat's debatable. AP mostly paid them to move to neighbouring states. What was earlier mostly confined to AP, then spread across Chattisgarh, Orissa, Jharkand and Maharashtra. The efficient thing to do would have been to actually wipe them out when they were localized, instead of icentivising them to spread into other states., that cannot be said about smaller statesActually its the bigger states that have the maoist problem, because the govt cannot look after the isolated and remote tribal regions. Too little governance, too many people and area to look after. as they do not have resources of police force capable of handling maoists.No other state was completely purged of maoists as AP did.Nobody believes your ideas here,Many people do. Please don't make the common mistake that simply because you don't agree with something, nobody else does, and it is all the handiwork of some idiot at the top. It is not. There are passionate people on both sides of this issue.
...... Please tell me you are kidding .
