PTI's Azadi March 14th August 2014 l Updates and debate.
- Thread starter Leader
- Start date
Norwegian
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2014
- Messages
- 19,001
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
Leader
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 29,159
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
PTI's TV AD for Nawaz Shareef's resignation. PTI exposes the double standards in this short ad.
Last edited:
Leader
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 29,159
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Leader
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 29,159
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
People continue to protest across the country. #AzaadiMarchPTI #Lahore 7th sept.
Saifkhan12
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
- Messages
- 564
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Great pictures, thanks for sharing. Crowds getting bigger every day.
Leader
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 29,159
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
must watch...
Saifkhan12
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
- Messages
- 564
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Thanks leader, that is one great video.
syedali73
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 6,066
- Reaction score
- 60
- Country
- Location
No PML(N) supporter bothers to reply to legit questions such as these. From the beginning, the PML(N) and her supporters are condemning the PTI/PAT for taking up the roads and criticizing PTI/PAT's for their supposedly agitative movement. Has PML(N) and PPP not done any agitative politics? What Nawaz has been doing against Benazir, and what Benazir has been doing against Nawaz? They and their supporters were not on the roads? How Justice Choudhary was restored? Was it not the result of street protest? Question arises, if agitative politics and taking up roads is OK and legitimate for PML(N)/PPP, and other parties, why it is not ok for IK/TAQ? Why is this hypocrisy?
PTI's TV AD for Nawaz Shareef's resignation. PTI exposes the double standards in this short ad.
Last edited:
jackhunter
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 31, 2013
- Messages
- 129
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Azadi March sit-in drawing crowds again
By Ikram Junaidi
Published about 2 hours ago
O O ‹›
Supporters of Imran Khan listen to his speech on September 6, 2014 during an anti-government protest in front of the parliament in Islamabad. — Photo by AFP
Supporters of Imran Khan listen to his speech on September 6, 2014 during an anti-government protest in front of the parliament in Islamabad. — Photo by AFP
ISLAMABAD: After the August 30 clashes with the police, the number of participants in the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) sit-in at D-Chowk has again started increasing.
On Sunday, a large number of PTI workers were seen heading towards the venue.
The PTI and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) started their sit-ins at Kashmir Highway on August 15. On August 19, both the parties entered the red zone.
After clashes with police, most PTI supporters from twin cities had stopped attending sit-in
Till August 29, a large number of people from the twin cities participated in the sit-in of the PTI.However, after August 30, when the marchers moved towards the Prime Minister House, and clashed with the police leaving three people dead and over 500 injured, most of the local residents stopped coming to the PTI sit-in.
Bilal Ahmed, a resident of Khayaban-i-Sir Syed in Rawalpindi, who was going to the PTI sit-in on Sunday, told Dawn that he believed in a peaceful protest but unfortunately the PTI had gone for an agitation.
“All over the world people protest peacefully. They hold protests after getting permission from the administration.
However, they only criticise the management of the city if they are not given permission to hold a protest.
“I supported the PTI with the hope that it would promote a new politics in the country. But I don’t know why the leadership of the party took a decision that led to clashes with the police.”
He said after the incident of August 30, he decided not to take part in the protest. “However, when Imran Khan took the sit-in participants back to D-Chowk, I decided to rejoin the sit-in because it showed the leadership of the party has realised that they should not go for an agitation,” he said.
Naeem Ahmed, a resident of Islamabad and another supporter of the PTI, added that there were lots of differences between the PTI and PAT supporters.
“The PAT supporters might not mince a word even if their leadership takes them to hell, but the supporters of the PTI are educated and can differentiate between a right and wrong decision,” he said.
“I did not join the PTI for an agitation. We should hold peaceful protests to give a message to the nation that the PML-N rigged the elections and is not ready to investigate the rigging.
“We should ensure election reforms so that the nation would reject the PML-N in the next elections,” he said.
In reply to a question, Mr Naeem said a majority of the PTI supporters did not attend the sit-in because of the August 30 incident.
He said rain was not a big issue as the PTI supporters had come to the sit-in at Kashmir Highways in droves despite rain, but stopped turning up after August 30.
An organiser of the PTI sit-in, Ali Awan, said he also believed that the supporters of the PTI and PAT were different in their approach to political issues.
“Most of the supporters of the PTI, who come from the twin cities, are not used to rain so they did not come to the sit-in during rains. Now the rains have stopped and the supporters of the party are back to the sit-in again,” he said.
But Mr Awan agreed that after the incident of August 30 the number of participants in the PTI sit-in had decreased.
“It is not unusual that after such bloodshed people avoid going to the place of the incident. After a terrorist attack on the Islamabad district courts, in which 11 people were killed, even some of the lawyers stopped going to the district courts for a month,” he said.
“Some of the PTI supporters might have frightened because of the teargas, firing and police baton charge. Besides, the walking distance had increased after the sit-in venue was shifted to the Cabinet Division from the D-Chowk.”
Published in Dawn, September 8th, 2014
Home - DAWN.COM
By Ikram Junaidi
Published about 2 hours ago
O O ‹›
Supporters of Imran Khan listen to his speech on September 6, 2014 during an anti-government protest in front of the parliament in Islamabad. — Photo by AFP
Supporters of Imran Khan listen to his speech on September 6, 2014 during an anti-government protest in front of the parliament in Islamabad. — Photo by AFP
ISLAMABAD: After the August 30 clashes with the police, the number of participants in the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) sit-in at D-Chowk has again started increasing.
On Sunday, a large number of PTI workers were seen heading towards the venue.
The PTI and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) started their sit-ins at Kashmir Highway on August 15. On August 19, both the parties entered the red zone.
After clashes with police, most PTI supporters from twin cities had stopped attending sit-in
Till August 29, a large number of people from the twin cities participated in the sit-in of the PTI.However, after August 30, when the marchers moved towards the Prime Minister House, and clashed with the police leaving three people dead and over 500 injured, most of the local residents stopped coming to the PTI sit-in.
Bilal Ahmed, a resident of Khayaban-i-Sir Syed in Rawalpindi, who was going to the PTI sit-in on Sunday, told Dawn that he believed in a peaceful protest but unfortunately the PTI had gone for an agitation.
“All over the world people protest peacefully. They hold protests after getting permission from the administration.
However, they only criticise the management of the city if they are not given permission to hold a protest.
“I supported the PTI with the hope that it would promote a new politics in the country. But I don’t know why the leadership of the party took a decision that led to clashes with the police.”
He said after the incident of August 30, he decided not to take part in the protest. “However, when Imran Khan took the sit-in participants back to D-Chowk, I decided to rejoin the sit-in because it showed the leadership of the party has realised that they should not go for an agitation,” he said.
Naeem Ahmed, a resident of Islamabad and another supporter of the PTI, added that there were lots of differences between the PTI and PAT supporters.
“The PAT supporters might not mince a word even if their leadership takes them to hell, but the supporters of the PTI are educated and can differentiate between a right and wrong decision,” he said.
“I did not join the PTI for an agitation. We should hold peaceful protests to give a message to the nation that the PML-N rigged the elections and is not ready to investigate the rigging.
“We should ensure election reforms so that the nation would reject the PML-N in the next elections,” he said.
In reply to a question, Mr Naeem said a majority of the PTI supporters did not attend the sit-in because of the August 30 incident.
He said rain was not a big issue as the PTI supporters had come to the sit-in at Kashmir Highways in droves despite rain, but stopped turning up after August 30.
An organiser of the PTI sit-in, Ali Awan, said he also believed that the supporters of the PTI and PAT were different in their approach to political issues.
“Most of the supporters of the PTI, who come from the twin cities, are not used to rain so they did not come to the sit-in during rains. Now the rains have stopped and the supporters of the party are back to the sit-in again,” he said.
But Mr Awan agreed that after the incident of August 30 the number of participants in the PTI sit-in had decreased.
“It is not unusual that after such bloodshed people avoid going to the place of the incident. After a terrorist attack on the Islamabad district courts, in which 11 people were killed, even some of the lawyers stopped going to the district courts for a month,” he said.
“Some of the PTI supporters might have frightened because of the teargas, firing and police baton charge. Besides, the walking distance had increased after the sit-in venue was shifted to the Cabinet Division from the D-Chowk.”
Published in Dawn, September 8th, 2014
Home - DAWN.COM
Leader
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 29,159
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
apart from Daghi. I dont see any rift, there maybe disagreement on strategy, after alll PTI is a new concept, and its not a family owned public limited dynasty.
Leader
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2010
- Messages
- 29,159
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
Azadi March sit-in drawing crowds again
After the August 30 clashes with the police, the number of participants in the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) sit-in at D-Chowk has again started increasing.
On Sunday, a large number of PTI workers were seen heading towards the venue.
The PTI and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) started their sit-ins at Kashmir Highway on August 15. On August 19, both the parties entered the red zone.
After clashes with police, most PTI supporters from twin cities had stopped attending sit-in
Till August 29, a large number of people from the twin cities participated in the sit-in of the PTI.However, after August 30, when the marchers moved towards the Prime Minister House, and clashed with the police leaving three people dead and over 500 injured, most of the local residents stopped coming to the PTI sit-in.
Bilal Ahmed, a resident of Khayaban-i-Sir Syed in Rawalpindi, who was going to the PTI sit-in on Sunday, told Dawn that he believed in a peaceful protest but unfortunately the PTI had gone for an agitation.
“All over the world people protest peacefully. They hold protests after getting permission from the administration.
However, they only criticise the management of the city if they are not given permission to hold a protest.
“I supported the PTI with the hope that it would promote a new politics in the country. But I don’t know why the leadership of the party took a decision that led to clashes with the police.”
He said after the incident of August 30, he decided not to take part in the protest. “However, when Imran Khan took the sit-in participants back to D-Chowk, I decided to rejoin the sit-in because it showed the leadership of the party has realised that they should not go for an agitation,” he said.
Naeem Ahmed, a resident of Islamabad and another supporter of the PTI, added that there were lots of differences between the PTI and PAT supporters.
“The PAT supporters might not mince a word even if their leadership takes them to hell, but the supporters of the PTI are educated and can differentiate between a right and wrong decision,” he said.
“I did not join the PTI for an agitation. We should hold peaceful protests to give a message to the nation that the PML-N rigged the elections and is not ready to investigate the rigging.
“We should ensure election reforms so that the nation would reject the PML-N in the next elections,” he said.
In reply to a question, Mr Naeem said a majority of the PTI supporters did not attend the sit-in because of the August 30 incident.
He said rain was not a big issue as the PTI supporters had come to the sit-in at Kashmir Highways in droves despite rain, but stopped turning up after August 30.
An organiser of the PTI sit-in, Ali Awan, said he also believed that the supporters of the PTI and PAT were different in their approach to political issues.
“Most of the supporters of the PTI, who come from the twin cities, are not used to rain so they did not come to the sit-in during rains. Now the rains have stopped and the supporters of the party are back to the sit-in again,” he said.
But Mr Awan agreed that after the incident of August 30 the number of participants in the PTI sit-in had decreased.
“It is not unusual that after such bloodshed people avoid going to the place of the incident. After a terrorist attack on the Islamabad district courts, in which 11 people were killed, even some of the lawyers stopped going to the district courts for a month,” he said.
“Some of the PTI supporters might have frightened because of the teargas, firing and police baton charge. Besides, the walking distance had increased after the sit-in venue was shifted to the Cabinet Division from the D-Chowk.”
After the August 30 clashes with the police, the number of participants in the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) sit-in at D-Chowk has again started increasing.
On Sunday, a large number of PTI workers were seen heading towards the venue.
The PTI and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) started their sit-ins at Kashmir Highway on August 15. On August 19, both the parties entered the red zone.
After clashes with police, most PTI supporters from twin cities had stopped attending sit-in
Till August 29, a large number of people from the twin cities participated in the sit-in of the PTI.However, after August 30, when the marchers moved towards the Prime Minister House, and clashed with the police leaving three people dead and over 500 injured, most of the local residents stopped coming to the PTI sit-in.
Bilal Ahmed, a resident of Khayaban-i-Sir Syed in Rawalpindi, who was going to the PTI sit-in on Sunday, told Dawn that he believed in a peaceful protest but unfortunately the PTI had gone for an agitation.
“All over the world people protest peacefully. They hold protests after getting permission from the administration.
However, they only criticise the management of the city if they are not given permission to hold a protest.
“I supported the PTI with the hope that it would promote a new politics in the country. But I don’t know why the leadership of the party took a decision that led to clashes with the police.”
He said after the incident of August 30, he decided not to take part in the protest. “However, when Imran Khan took the sit-in participants back to D-Chowk, I decided to rejoin the sit-in because it showed the leadership of the party has realised that they should not go for an agitation,” he said.
Naeem Ahmed, a resident of Islamabad and another supporter of the PTI, added that there were lots of differences between the PTI and PAT supporters.
“The PAT supporters might not mince a word even if their leadership takes them to hell, but the supporters of the PTI are educated and can differentiate between a right and wrong decision,” he said.
“I did not join the PTI for an agitation. We should hold peaceful protests to give a message to the nation that the PML-N rigged the elections and is not ready to investigate the rigging.
“We should ensure election reforms so that the nation would reject the PML-N in the next elections,” he said.
In reply to a question, Mr Naeem said a majority of the PTI supporters did not attend the sit-in because of the August 30 incident.
He said rain was not a big issue as the PTI supporters had come to the sit-in at Kashmir Highways in droves despite rain, but stopped turning up after August 30.
An organiser of the PTI sit-in, Ali Awan, said he also believed that the supporters of the PTI and PAT were different in their approach to political issues.
“Most of the supporters of the PTI, who come from the twin cities, are not used to rain so they did not come to the sit-in during rains. Now the rains have stopped and the supporters of the party are back to the sit-in again,” he said.
But Mr Awan agreed that after the incident of August 30 the number of participants in the PTI sit-in had decreased.
“It is not unusual that after such bloodshed people avoid going to the place of the incident. After a terrorist attack on the Islamabad district courts, in which 11 people were killed, even some of the lawyers stopped going to the district courts for a month,” he said.
“Some of the PTI supporters might have frightened because of the teargas, firing and police baton charge. Besides, the walking distance had increased after the sit-in venue was shifted to the Cabinet Division from the D-Chowk.”
Last edited:
Similar threads
