What's new

proposal for a new division of south asia

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dam! !!

Gaddafi was a loon and left behind a few of his jamaria buffoons. The closest I see Gaddafi to is the Kim Jong clan
 
.
go ahead and declare you residence an independent socialist state. nobody will care.
 
.
Im all for it

Bangladesh, WB, Odissa, Bihar, UP, Chattishgar, Sikkim, Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Nagaland, Mizoram, AP, Tripura

The East Zone.

1. the regions you list are held by one thing that will fail the idea... shared language and culture... and that will lead to regionalism which will go counter to the basis of the idea... :-)

2. the zone you want is very big... the ideal zones is one which enclosed about five cities and every human habitation must be a city... all villages turned into cities... immediate progress... if anyone mentions agriculture, there is urban farming.
 
.
No , partition in my opinion was a mistake, it weakened the Muslims , by dividing them in to three zones , while uniting the Hindus into one platform, I believe in this very strongly , thanks to Partition today, close to 55 crore Muslims that's 550 million Muslims ! of south-Asia is divided , & close 900 million Hindus are united, how was this a good thing is beyond me , so NO Bhai, thanks but, no thanks ! no more partition or division, if anything this is the time for a "Confederation"

Did you just say you wanted to bring socialism into the picture? You had no f**ing clue what you're talking about do you?

e6dd853d677f397439436da514b6c253.jpg
 
.
I live in Chennai. Very difficult to find a person who speaks more than a smattering of Hindi. These forceful leaders of yours will have to start universal coaching classes.

the present anti-hindi situation in madras is because of the perception of hindi regionalism from the central governments... which has lead to tamil regionalism... and the tamil regionalists don't even see it... :-)

even bangalore is full of kannada regionalism, even though it was non-kannada technologies and people which grew bangalore.

if english becomes official language, people in madras should have no objections, yes?? if they still have objection, it means they want petty concerns to hinder their own progress... besides, every city in this arrangement should become cosmopolitan with new names and sign boards... people should be moved from here, there and everywhere.
 
.
the above kind of division among humanity is the necessary future... the solution is as simple as people reading, talking with others over tea, accepting... the solution becomes impossible to achieve if people continue their unnecessary hatreds and nationalism...
you sound like a communist lool

i think south asia will always be divided

also india is truly a subcontinent. the states have no more in common with each other than say france, britain, germany etc. the only language that could unite india is english, but then it will become even more divided as english is the international language for the whole world so people will continue speaking regional language. i don't support any other language being used (i.e. hindi) because that is basic imperialism. any way of "unifying" india involves imperialism. there is no way.
 
Last edited:
.
Gaddafi was a loon and left behind a few of his jamaria buffoons. The closest I see Gaddafi to is the Kim Jong clan

and to kill that man, it took 35+ western bloc militaries plus puppets ( ikhwaan/taliban/qaeda etc )...

besides, his friends were nelson mandela, hugo chavez and carlos... call them loons too.

and it was russia which provided satellite imagery to disprove bbc and white house claims that "gaddafi was killing civilians, including women and children".

go say your theories to vladimir putin...

you are not the brightest among humans.

go ahead and declare you residence an independent socialist state. nobody will care.
Did you just say you wanted to bring socialism into the picture? You had no f**ing clue what you're talking about do you?

there come the anti-human brigade of video-game-playing college boys...

you sound like a communist lool

i am. :-)

i think south asia will always be divided

modern south asian culture is not terribly a gentle and thinking culture... change must be brought by revolution, by whichever means...
 
. .
@Bong you too want reorganization of south asia, and i support you... just that we differ in the two points i mentioned in reply to you earlier.
 
.
Its all ok for south asia to try to live peacefully, but some socialism social experiment like Cambodia???

They say socialism / communism is as strong a drug as religion. Apprently gives an equally good high too.
 
.
respectfully, i disagree... :-)

change must be brought immediately and radically... otherwise it cannot be called change... it won't be different from what was there before... have india and pakistan really developed in 69 years?? even now, in 2014, india and pakistan have honor killings and oppressions by money...



correct you are... look at the below photograph from 80's afghanistan ( kabul )... can you image that scene happening now??

View attachment 145275

source - Dammit! I missed the good times! | The Lost Flaneur

was the above not real development?? those ladies seem happy... that was because of immediate change imposed by socialism... imposed... the revolutionary government and military didn't go to every person and ask... the revolutionary government knew what was good and used military means to bring that good... can you imagine the above scene now?? what was the system then and what is it now??



source - Women in Afghanistan | A Thousand Splendid Suns Study Guide | GradeSaver

This happens when 10-20% of citizens trying to reach to 21st century leaving behind 80% of the fellow citizens 1n 1400 AD.
True for India (Naxalites) and Pakistan too. An inclusive development is one of the keys to get rid of such situation.
 
.
We have already beaten the discussion of Partition to its death but lets re-look and summarize them.
1) Partition was political strategy and it has nothing to do with Hindu or Muslim divide. People get confused. It started with autonomy of Muslim League controlled states to getting prime minister ship of undivided India.

2) Idea Separate state was based on religious Identity was for 'Province' and not 'Country' originally

3) Undivided India had only one thing to make them in one bound and that was Britishers other wise culturally, NWFP has nothing with Meghalaya. This is the reason, Burma/Myanmar was made a separate colony by the British and we don't fight over it.

4) Partition happened in 1947 was not accepted by general public in total by that time. The result is that we still have all religious identities in every country.

5) Partition was never expected to have such bloodbath but the expedited process of partition created havoc. Also, people leaving their homeland of years became emotional to kill each other.

6) Even in 1947, Only Punjab and Bengal were supposed to be separated based on Religious identities and lines are supposed to be drawn. Rest all princely states were asked to join the either union or be independent. This is the most important part and people ignore it. Now, it was one's govt who either tried to merge them peacefully or forcibly and that is history.It happened earlier and happened 60 years back so move on.

7) Further partition in 1971, irrespective of historical events, defines that South Asia is more 'Cultural' and 'Language' bound rather than Religious bound. A Punjabi feels close to Punjabi on other side, UP/Bihar to Muhajir from Karachi, Bengali to Bengali etc

And as it is said that "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel", It has been utilized by our leaders on time to time basis. I request people to start seeing it in this way.
 
.
This happens when 10-20% of citizens trying to reach to 21st century leaving behind 80% of the fellow citizens 1n 1400 AD.
True for India (Naxalites) and Pakistan too. An inclusive development is one of the keys to get rid of such situation.

you must elaborate... i didn't understand... why that specific year, 1400 ad... why the mention of naxalite... why thatt cliched indian government term, "inclusive growth"...
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom