[Poll] Should India maintain it's policy of striking Pakistan after each Terrorist incident?

[proudindian20]

Since it seems that India has conducted 2 strikes in Pakistan after 2 terrorist incidents in India so far. Does it make sense to continue pursuing this policy? The implications of this policy could include either parties getting confused and launching a full scale war.

What are your thoughts?

 

[Riz]

From PAF side.... Yes...

 

[Sabretooth]

Offcourse yes. Keep sending those rust buckets for the target practice of PAF.

 

[Awan68]

Since it seems that India has conducted 2 strikes in Pakistan after 2 terrorist incidents in India so far. Does it make sense to continue pursuing this policy? The implications of this policy could include either parties getting confused and launching a full scale war.

What are your thoughts?

You have attempted only one strike, attempted. For the other one u have no evidence. So now lets get to ur singular attempted strike, well u failed to kill even a songle person or destrpy any building as authenticated by neutral international sources so that matter is not up debate. Well in reply to ur attempted strike, PAF conducted 6 similar strikes in India and shot down two of ur jets and arrested ur pilot. I knw u people have no shame but conjure up some and calm down...... u dont have the capacity to walk ur stupid talk.

 

[Areesh]

Well it should continue if it is botched up and failed one like what IAF has done on 26 Feb

 

[maximuswarrior]

I think it definitely should.

We will pay in kind for each attack.

Since it seems that India has conducted 2 strikes in Pakistan after 2 terrorist incidents in India so far. Does it make sense to continue pursuing this policy? The implications of this policy could include either parties getting confused and launching a full scale war.

What are your thoughts?

Proud Indian LOL Crazy fvck. You got nothing to be proud of.

 

[Titanium100]

Why do the mods allow such threads

 

[Side-Winder]

Go Ask your Abhinandans!

 

[Imran Khan]

yes why not if you want to be beaten like a dog

 

[gangsta_rap]

Keep the trend up hahahah

 

[proudindian20]

You have attempted only one strike, attempted. For the other one u have no evidence. So now lets get to ur singular attempted strike, well u failed to kill even a songle person or destrpy any building as authenticated by neutral international sources so that matter is not up debate. Well in reply to ur attempted strike, PAF conducted 6 similar strikes in India and shot down two of ur jets and arrested ur pilot. I knw u people have no shame but conjure up some and calm down...... u dont have the capacity to walk ur stupid talk.

Why should our armed forces give any evidence of strike/kills in Pakistan? It's sensitive intel that can be used to infer our methods. Did US give any proof when they killed Osama Bin Laden? Did Mossad ever claim revenge for their dead Olympic athletes?

 

[YeBeWarned]

and losing two fighters and capture of 1 pilot .. sure why not

 

[proudindian20]

yes why not if you want to be beaten like a dog

Lol you forgot to include the video of your downed F-16 pilot which was beaten to death by your own people

 

[Imran Khan]

Lol you forgot to include the video of your downed F-16 pilot which was beaten to death by your own people

only indians can dream such a wet dream that a pilot was killed by mop in his own country . you people are wired

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Since it seems that India has conducted 2 strikes in Pakistan after 2 terrorist incidents in India so far. Does it make sense to continue pursuing this policy? The implications of this policy could include either parties getting confused and launching a full scale war.

What are your thoughts?

Yes. We lose a tree or two and you lose few fighter jets. And your captured pilots get chai and free toilet training in Pakistan.

Ps. Such a good deal I voted 'yes'.