airmarshal
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 9,361
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
I voted Yes and the reason is I want India to be smacked really big if it intrudes next time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since it seems that India has conducted 2 strikes in Pakistan after 2 terrorist incidents in India so far. Does it make sense to continue pursuing this policy? The implications of this policy could include either parties getting confused and launching a full scale war.
What are your thoughts?
you forget PAF bomb india with Raptors standoff weapons 6 locations tooYes. We lose a tree or two and you lose few fighter jets. And your captured pilots get chai and free toilet training in Pakistan.
Ps. Such a good deal I voted 'yes'.
Lol you forgot to include the video of your downed F-16 pilot which was beaten to death by your own people
Since it seems that India has conducted 2 strikes in Pakistan after 2 terrorist incidents in India so far. Does it make sense to continue pursuing this policy? The implications of this policy could include either parties getting confused and launching a full scale war.
What are your thoughts?
Me as well. Jai Hind.I voted Yes. Jai hind.
War should be last resort to find a solution for any issue.... Sometimes, history is written for the race who can take brave decision...Brave decision can be either go for a full war and except the outcome or allow Kashmir valley to decide their own fate or abolish 370 and forget about human rights and settle Non Muslims across the valley..
If you ask me a better choice out of these 3, i will go settle Non Muslims in Kashmir valley and screw with artcile 370.... For me Pakistan is not a problem, our inability to take hard decision and blaming the whole world expect ourselves is a problem...
Pakistan is not our friend...So it is expected that they will support all the anti Indian groups...It is the same case, India should support all anti Pakistan elements too..But that does not mean, we will start attacking the every one without fixing our own problem...
A better question to ask, should Indians choose a terrorist as head of state, as PM of a country who was called the 'Butcher of Gujarat' and was banned for 10 years to visit US and EU countries.
And who has connived to massacre over 2000 innocent Muslims in Gujarat India...
Me as well. Jai Hind.
It’s not your inability to make decision, it’s that you cannot take any action ... your military knows it... be sincere to yourself atleast, or else you will get the same level of chitrol from Pakistan
So true... one terrorist talking about eliminating terrorism ???? Baffles me...
What u just helped me make up my mind to not continue this pointless discussion. I used to like educating children but now i just get bored so....kindly dont qoute me again.Why should our armed forces give any evidence of strike/kills in Pakistan? It's sensitive intel that can be used to infer our methods. Did US give any proof when they killed Osama Bin Laden? Did Mossad ever claim revenge for their dead Olympic athletes?
Everyday will not be a Sunday.As long as each strike ends in Indian humiliation, I'm for it.
Since it seems that India has conducted 2 strikes in Pakistan after 2 terrorist incidents in India so far. Does it make sense to continue pursuing this policy? The implications of this policy could include either parties getting confused and launching a full scale war.
What are your thoughts?