Again you are missing the point....That's why i gave you the example of 100 vs 10 rupees...which you choose to make fun of...Anyways even for the sake of argument say Indian economy will be hit badly but don't you think these are the factors that will be considered before surgical atrikes??? Here we are talking about what should be the Pakistani response...Indian econmoy getting crippled or not is not the deterant for Pakistan...her deterant would be how much damage she is willing to take to harm India....Am i making some sense???
Speaking to you is like
Well if damaging or crippling economy was not a deterrent for Pakistan then why did Vajpayee not go to war or limited war in 2001. As this is a definite thing Pakistan would exploit, why. Well quite simply because if we really are going into a war, limited or not, may as well do whatever damage that can be done to India militarily and economically. Who is to decide that such an attack on the Indian economical sector will bring about a full fledged war leading to nukes.
Please don't be naive(that's the best word i can come up with for such a remark!!!!)....Do you honestly believe that Pakistan will launch attack on Stock Exchange of India???? what made you think that thereafter there will be any chance to limit the conflict??? Please understand pakistan Army is not a suicide squad whose aim is to destroy the opponent by killing themselves....Your's is a professional army who would like to give a fitting reply to India but by avoiding collateral damage.. don't you think so???
Secondly you are telling me again and again about your missiles...and how you have the ability to be offensive against India... This reminds of a similar video on one of the thread where some freak Indian channel is describing how India will ruin Pakistan in 10 steps without considering Pakistani response...My advice in you assessment please don't make the same mistakes....
Again, you just simply do not understand someone elses post, its again like
With regards to attacking Indian economy, please see above first paragraph, and also based on the 2001 scenario, it appears that many investers will be leaving willingly before any Pakistani attempt anyway, why would Pakistan not do something to hit India where it hurts, you need to come out of this fantasy dream. seriously, all options are on the table, to you hitting so called terror camps, or freedom fighter camps is acceptable but for Pakistan to hit Indian targets as well as other targets, is a no no becuase Indian forum members think so, well ok
You have said Pakistan would not like to increase the theatre of war. You seem to assume Pakistan will sit in a defensive mode......sorry, 40 years have past since the last war, you dont know how Pakistan is going to react, but my point is, and please read this again ans=d again to comprehend......Pakistan has the means for offensive attacks, as proven by the missile names given (those names were given to hopefully get you to understand) and Kargil is an example and is the General Majids comment I mentioned earlier that Pakistan has the ability and stomach to do so.
Then you say my statement was being dumn....I have made it clear ample number of times that its not India who will dictate the theater of war....Let me repeat INDIA WONT DECIDE...I even gave you the example of Kargil..Did pakistan decide how much should be the theater of war...it was India...and what did India decide??? to keep the theater small....Now if you believe that India lacks guts..they don't have ability to launch offensive against Pak or the famous theory of 1 PA soldier = 20 IN soldier or anything like that then i can't help....
??????????????????????????????????????
My point is that PA would not like to increase the theater of war for their own good... Not like someone dictating them....
for their own good..........When a strike is launched, that is it, it is an attack and it is a declared war. Pakistan is not going to sit for a tit for tat and wait for India to hit a target in Pakistan and respond with hitting a target in India....I mean, who the hell do you think you Indians are.....we will target what we like in war, not India.
Please educate yourself on this matter..if i go by your logic then we should have divided india into smaller states and we would have easily become super power by now...
Do you know the difference between Bangladesh currency vs Pakistan currency??? So your logic that Bangladesh was a liability for Pak is flawed...Anyways upto you i have no intentions to debate on this with you...lets stick to topic in hand....
Yes I believe Bangladesh was a liability, my view, talk about educating oneself, I have been educated, just my education from my Pakistan's point of view and yours, well your is Indian so quite obviously it MUST be correct...as India is the only one that can be.
Again as i said that Vitory has many fathers and defeat is an orphan....People give this logic that Pakistan lost because mukhti bahini helped India otherwise they would not have succeeded...but very conveniently they forget that who provided logictic support to them...who trained them...who provided amunitions etc etc....Don't you think we have enough men on our side to have inflicted the same damage?? Anyways the results of the war is there for all of us to see and learn from it...I don't want to take anything from Mukhti Bahini people who fought for their country's freedom...So let's leave it there...
Have you even read my post with diggin a hole for yourself........I have already said, whether Bangladeshis deserted tjeir platoons or whatever had happenned which caused Pakistan to loose the war, it doesn;t matter, Pakistan lost, it is as simple as that......which part of this did not just not understand......
Well exactly i think China is superior to us in numbers to say the least...and that's why i will be living in fools paradise to say that India can be offensive against China in a full fledge war...our best bet would be a defensive posture and let them attack...
Well we differ in that............Israeli/Arab war shows otherwise. Launchinf an offensive can open up many options and keep the enemy on their toes.......how many battles have you taken part in deckingraj...other then the armchair expert one
Then you are plane wrong...Period....I am nobody to bring you out of this dream...With due respect you have less knowledge about your country's defense might vs Indian Army..so my suggestion read more on this....There are plenty of threads here from which you can grasp lot of knowledge(in case you wan't to)....
Well according to your Generak he can fight both Pakistan and China........You again are living in a superioty complex, I am getting tired of using this word just as much as I am getting tired of hearing the word terrorist. India thinks its has a better force, and in some ways like technology it does, however, all depends heavily also on ground forces and I believe our ground troops are second to none. My view, you have your...........
My frustration??? Do you really see that i am frustrated when i am countering your points with Logic??? When i say emotions i mean statements like we have this we have that and completely ignoring the other party also have similar things if not better....I hope i made my point clear...
Logic, well Indian logic is not logic altogether, its sheer lunacy. Reminds me Sri Sri Ravi Shankars view like kutarka
Kutarka means wrong logic or illogical, where the intention is not right. Logic is applied here with the sole purpose of finding fault. One knows deep inside that it is not right, but still, logically you prove that it is right. This is called Kutarka.
For example: The door is half open means the door is half closed. Therefore, the door is fully open means the door is fully closed!......This can only happen in India
