Bilal Khan (Quwa)
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
- Messages
- 7,004
- Reaction score
- 97
- Country
- Location
Actually, the JF-17B won't be the PAF's LIFT. From his recent interactions with ACM Sohail Aman, Alan Warnes said the PAF doesn't think that current LIFT platforms offer much value relative to the cost. In fact, the LIFTs on the market today are too complex and over-equipped for the role. So the PAF will use FT-7s as LIFT.Media also shows picture of Babur missile when reporting the test firing of Shaheed three so there is that!!
Yes we were looking for a LIFT but JF17B is most likely an response to that (along with export requirement).
For tank engine, Ukraine is what we would be relying upon for some years to come. Best to get both 1200 hp and 1500 hp with ToT and look for some 800-1000 hp as well if possible.
Yes there were some talks about these things but that was not an official interest and it is long dead story now.
And dont you think we need to first see for our self how good those M-114 can be after upgrade? Ergo the procurement of one Kh179 for trials?
That said, I personally suspect the PAF is awaiting the TAI-SNC Freedom Trainer. If you read through Aviation Week's interview with SNC, you'll find that the Freedom Trainer is being designed to the ignore complex and costly subsystems the PAF was uncomfortable with in the L-15 and T-50. It'll even use non-afterburning turbofans (something the PAF implied it would prefer). No secondary role for light fighter or strike, just a pure FBW-equipped trainer for LIFT with low acquisition and operating costs.
http://m.aviationweek.com/defense/sierra-nevada-corp-tai-team-offer-freedom-trainer-t-x
Sorry for going off topic, back to artillery. A recent Serbian article says something about the Pakistan Army wanting 700 SPHs and testing a Serb rocket too? @proka89 would you be able to translate or explain what's being said in the link below?
http://www.pravda.rs/2017/05/11/snaga-srpskog-oruzja/
Last edited: