Kingslayerr
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2019
- Messages
- 831
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is why I said Pakistan should get as many Saab 2000 as possible to act as auxiliary aircraft as when needed. Plus the platform has the potential to be Pakistan's Stand Off Jammer.
Should go for license production of SAAB 2000 at PAC. It might be a good replacement for ATRs in PIA and also other private airlines.
ah no, that is not at all viable. There are less than 100 saab 2000 built 1992-97 and the reasons is that the demand for them was not high. The users who bought them have gradually removed them from service and they are mostly in storages. Pakistan can acquired many used craft for airframe. Since PAF repaired the Saab 2000 when saab itself said that it is a total write off means the capability to keep the fleet active without external input. As navy is now looking for a turbofan LRMPA they dont need Saab 2000 unless...Should go for license production of SAAB 2000 at PAC. It might be a good replacement for ATRs in PIA and also other private airlines.
any video on production facility?ah no, that is not at all viable. There are less than 100 saab 2000 built 1992-97 and the reasons is that the demand for them was not high. The users who bought them have have gradually removed them from service and they are mostly in storages. Pakistan can acquired many used craft for airframe. Since PAF repaired the Saab 2000 when saab itself said that it is a total write off means the capability to keep the fleet active without external input. As navy is now looking for a turbofan LRMPA they dont need Saab 2000 unless...
ah no, that is not at all viable. There are less than 100 saab 2000 built 1992-97 and the reasons is that the demand for them was not high. The users who bought them have have gradually removed them from service and they are mostly in storages. Pakistan can acquired many used craft for airframe. Since PAF repaired the Saab 2000 when saab itself said that it is a total write off means the capability to keep the fleet active without external input. As navy is now looking for a turbofan LRMPA they dont need Saab 2000 unless...
why not, PAF did their homework and chose Saab 2000 because it fits their needs. After Pakistan Saudi's bought Saab 2000 configuration as well.In that case, is it viable for PAF to be flying Erieye system on SAAB 2000?
Turbofan is part of the jet engine family! The jet will have Turbofan power plant
700 USD per hour flight cost , Vs 2500 USD per hour for the Emberer.In that case, is it viable for PAF to be flying Erieye system on SAAB 2000?
700 USD per hour flight cost , Vs 2500 USD per hour for the Emberer.
Do the maths.
They're working to offset that with their in-house AEW&C, which they've integrated to the ERJ-145. I think they have several now, at least. In terms of materials, they're working to address their gaps, for sure.I can just imagine the operating cost of the IL78 based Phalcon AWACs used by India. No wonder they only have three. I understand their loitering time is not impressive.
Their range is impressiveI can just imagine the operating cost of the IL78 based Phalcon AWACs used by India. No wonder they only have three. I understand their loitering time is not impressive.