GriffinsRule
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 3,394
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
That is an epic marketing fail. Quite embarrassing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm,, that makes sense. Since the Chinese company will want to display it as there product so PAC we had to change it. But why mentioned GIDS (as done by AW in his tweet, isnt this from NESCOM)Same weapon was being marketed by the OEM at Chinese pavilion. Could have caused some IPR issue i believe.
Hmmm,, that makes sense. Since the Chinese company will want to display it as there product so PAC we had to change it. But why mentioned GIDS (as done by AW in his tweet, isnt this from NESCOM)
I will see if i can mention this to AW and perhaps he can explain it further.
OEM
And IPR abbreviation??
Hmmm,, that makes sense. Since the Chinese company will want to display it as there product so PAC we had to change it. But why mentioned GIDS (as done by AW in his tweet, isnt this from NESCOM)
I will see if i can mention this to AW and perhaps he can explain it further.
Frankly, a UCAV of size of CH3 is of very limited potential. Its already limited loiter time, altitude and range reduce further by big margin when it carries on board weapon systems.I understand that with WL-II coming in they will be our primary UCAV but why should the weapons be taken off from Burraq? You are marketing it at an expo and wont want to take off those missiles unless it actually cannot support them at all.
Still bro when you are trying to sell a weapon system you do dispaly its full potential. Wheather it is suited for carrying weapons or not, IF it can carry it have to be announced. There might be customers looking for that limited capability. The only thing that makes sense is what @Dazzler said, same system being marketed at Chinese stands as well so we just changed it at our end and will export as a recon UAV.Frankly, a UCAV of size of CH3 is of very limited potential. Its already limited loiter time, altitude and range reduce further by big margin when it carries on board weapon systems.
Burraq was developed from CH3 in an attempt to ensure learning related to operational utility of combat drones in asymmetric environment. Its strike missions during day and night times were more like test missions in real battlefield. We have gained precious experience from Burraq development, operational deployments and utility.
Now, since we are moving forward with bigger and more capable UCAVs, I guess its better to use Burraq for role which suits it better. i.e battlefield recon.
Role of unmanned systems in PAF is going to enlarge and we will procure Chinese and domestic options for full filling those roles more efficiently.
Surprisingly, Navy is more inclined towards Turkish unmanned systems.
Well, our people did three strange things.Still bro when you are trying to sell a weapon system you do dispaly its full potential. Wheather it is suited for carrying weapons or not, IF it can carry it have to be announced. There might be customers looking for that limited capability. The only thing that makes sense is what @Dazzler said, same system being marketed at Chinese stands as well so we just changed it at our end and will export as a recon UAV.
Make sense.The only thing that makes sense is what @Dazzler said, same system being marketed at Chinese stands as well so we just changed it at our end and will export as a recon UAV.
MBT........not the rjght time to show it to the world...I guessWell, our people did three strange things.
1: They didn't allow our Mi35 to reach IDEAS for static display at stall of Russian Helicopter. Russians were pissed.
2: They didn't allow static display of Pakistan next generation MBT. Its arrival was cancelled at last moment.
3: And this hasty removal of Missile thing from Burraq marketing display.
Well, our people did three strange things.
1: They didn't allow our Mi35 to reach IDEAS for static display at stall of Russian Helicopter. Russians were pissed.
2: They didn't allow static display of Pakistan next generation MBT. Its arrival was cancelled at last moment.
3: And this hasty removal of Missile thing from Burraq marketing display.
or may be we don't want to sell Armed version .....Hey what up with Burraq?
View attachment 522909
I understand that with WL-II coming in they will be our primary UCAV but why should the weapons be taken off from Burraq? You are marketing it at an expo and wont want to take off those missiles unless it actually cannot support them at all.
@Dazzler @HRK @Tipu7 @Sulman Badshah any thoughts? @Slav Defence
New Update.A good news! TAI expressed that They are negotiating with Pakistan to sell sat controlled Anka-S variant for Pakistan Navy. It is expected to reach the success thnks to reference of Atak deal.
https://www.cnnturk.com/ekonomi/tur...source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer&page=6
Not likely but not impossible either!or may be we don't want to sell Armed version .....
Should have added BARQ missile on under the wings