Basel
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2013
- Messages
- 9,504
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
My point was that naval strikes on targets far out in India from Sea will not effect the result of a fast moving ground war thousands of miles away. We do not seek to cripple Indias ability to fight (they are simply too large), but to defeat them on the battlefield. Two very different things.
I have studied war and do not need your patronising attitude, how old are you to type like this to me? My point is we do not need to strike targets far inland thousands of miles away in India. All PN has to do is keep IN off our backs and sea lanes open. Not bomb IN Eastern Command. Pakistan's fate will not be decided there.
Let me know if you understand that or I can explain again and draw it in crayon for you....
Why PN must have long legs when it comes to fight war with India? The answer is simple in nearly every hostility in past IN was able to mobilize nearly all of it's ships against Pakistan, which had put PN in pressure, if PN can hit far away bases and disrupt trade from ports of India it will put huge pressure on India to put defensive force in large numbers to protect it's ports and assets,. Which will also allow PN to handle IN better in Arabian sea and other strategic straits.