Pakistan conducts successful test launch of Shaheen-3 SSM (2750 km)

[Pomegranate]

Syed sahab my main concern is about Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India which is still out of range. India is developing these islands to host Nuclear submarines and launch Ballistic missile from it in futureView attachment 200881

I am pretty sure pakistan has got the capability to hit this sort of range the problem is if we would test something big than the world would all of the sudden feel threatened so that is what pakistan does not want and we don't show weapons to the world the way india is showing coz we are smart we don't want india to develop the counter for that ... that is why most of the info is kept in secret .

 

[syedali73]

Syed sahab my main concern is about Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India which is still out of range. India is developing these islands to host Nuclear submarines and launch Ballistic missile from it in futureView attachment 200881


But pakistan would likely launch missiles from within deep territories like mountainous areas of balochistan or along FATA region . In that case distance becomes 3500-3700 KM for Nico bar and and to hit South indian cities distance becomes 3000-3200 KM.

Can we have ballistic missiles on the ships? Yes yes, I know I am not talking about the subs, but the ships.

 

[genmirajborgza786]

@Oscar @The Deterrent

saeen does this missile have a range of only 2750 km or 3000 km ?

as it doesn't makes sense to increase the range to just 250 km from the previous Shaheen II @ 2500 km

 

[kurup]

Can we have ballistic missiles on the ships? Yes yes, I know I am not talking about the subs, but the ships.

You can but right now you don't .

 

[Wolfhound]

Can we have ballistic missiles on the ships? Yes yes, I know I am not talking about the subs, but the ships.

I think we can but with massive upgradation of the ship

 

[Bratva]

Can we have ballistic missiles on the ships? Yes yes, I know I am not talking about the subs, but the ships.

No we can not. Our ships are of bava adam era.

I am pretty sure pakistan has got the capability to hit this sort of range the problem is if we would test something big than the world would all of the sudden feel threatened so that is what pakistan does not want and we don't show weapons to the world the way india is showing coz we are smart we don't want india to develop the counter for that ... that is why most of the info is kept in secret .

When world doesn't feel threatened by Indian missile tests than why would they be afraid of Pak Missiles. These are just lame excuses.

 

[syedali73]

No we can not. Our ships are of bava adam era.

This is not related to this thread by I am curious to know why ships are not equipped with BMs? I have yet to find a ship equipped with BM? Perhaps it is because they can easily be tracked (following launch) and neutralized?

@Penguin @Horus @Dazzler @The Deterrent

 

[Gentelman]

2750? atleast they should have added 250 KM more range in to missile

What do you say of the probability of reducing the range of missiles by SPD themselves to keep ears of certain world plyers low on Pakistani missile program?

 

[Bratva]

This is not related to this thread by I am curious to know why ships are not equipped with BMs? I have yet to find a ship equipped with BM? Perhaps it is because they can easily be tracked (following launch) and neutralized?

No proper launch mechanism developed for ship launch ballistic missiles plus missiles in it's current foam can't be launched from ship because of the weight issues.

 

[Viper0011.]

#Pakistan conducts successful test launch of #Shaheen-3 SSM,capable of carrying nuclear,conventional warheads to range of 2750 KMs

I want positive ratings

What they didn't disclose is the fact that this was a "controlled" or "reduced" range test. Does anyone on here know the "actual" range?

 

[Bratva]

What do you say of the probability of reducing the range of missiles by SPD themselves to keep ears of certain world plyers low on Pakistani missile program?

Lame excuses. Certain players know all about Pakistan missile programs. It's just to exaggerate capabilities to gullible masses of Pakistan, such excuses are given

 

[Asfandyar.Khan]

Stupid. We need to invest in carrier fleet to control the gulf sea. That will give us an option to choke oil supply to our east in case of war.
Ghq needs to have a stronger, way stronger navy than it has right now

 

[Viny]

Congrats to Team.
People questioning the range figures, should also understand in 10yrs things have changed a lot both technologically as well as geopolitically. Under the given circumstances keeping up the development project and incorporating recent technologies under the sanctions umbrella is quite an achievement. Dont look it just as one more extension, I think a lot has gone into it to make it adaptable to current technology, launch and guidance systems.

No we can not. Our ships are of bava adam era.
When world doesn't feel threatened by Indian missile tests than why would they be afraid of Pak Missiles. These are just lame excuses.

Easiest way for you to understand would be that world dont see Pakistan with same eye as they see India.
Call it perception management failure or call it failure at ground level in Pakistan.

Pakistan can beat or meet levels any leading country if it can work strengthening it basics like
1. Global Quality Education and not just local limited set of education.
2. Religious tolerance and adaptability to changes or improvise.

 

[alimobin memon]

Oh my God I just watched the video on news I really witnessed the missile test in real near korangi crossing karachi I have pics I will upload soon at first I though it was nasr cause the missile smoke pattern was lil zig zag at launch I even heard a little bit of sound I am so lucky to witness a missile test P.S yes It looked white and in video its white yoo hoo

 

[Kompromat]

Stupid. We need to invest in carrier fleet to control the gulf sea. That will give us an option to choke oil supply to our east in case of war.
Ghq needs to have a stronger, way stronger navy than it has right now

We do, but we need a credible nuclear detterent first.

Carrier battle group also requires huge investment. First we need nuclear subs then comes the surface fleet.