ares
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2010
- Messages
- 5,483
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
Shaheen IV range 6000km
Considering it took 11 yrs to go from Shaheen 2 to Shaheen 3 ..hopefully we will see it tested by 2026.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shaheen IV range 6000km
That's correct. I don't know where people got the info that Shaheen 2 had 2500 km range, maybe they are mixing it with Ghauri, which too had only 2000km range. It was never more than 1500km.
What's the full payload??
Sonum kapoor
why so hurry ? it was not need of time the need of time was babur raad and nasr more then long range . even now do we really need 3500km missile ? for what ?Considering it took 11 yrs to go from Shaheen 2 to Shaheen 3 ..hopefully we will see it tested by 2026.
That's correct. I don't know where people got the info that Shaheen 2 had 2500 km range, maybe they are mixing it with Ghauri, which too had only 2000km range. It was never more than 1500km.
Considering it took 11 yrs to go from Shaheen 2 to Shaheen 3 ..hopefully we will see it tested by 2026.
One has to understand the difference between at maximum range vs at its maximum range!?They've never said before that the missile is tested at maximum range and if they've named it as Shaheen 3, then 2750 definitely isn't its max range otherwise what's the purpose of new name for just 250Km increased range?
Here
You are assuming that missile has not been fired at a minimum energy trajectory and its range can be further increased by changing it is trajectory,
It is infact, you who are trolling and coming up with hypothesis to suit your narrative, as the alternative is hard digest for you that it is infact 2750 Km (maximum range missile).
lol.......Shaheen IV range 6000km
do you have any prove that it was fired in minimum energy trajectory ... ?? No ... ?? OK leave it .... you are hell-bent prove two thinks
1- That I posted it is fired in depress trajectory
2- Your claim that it is fired in minimum energy trajectory ....
For the first point you still have to prove that I said or posted that it was fired in depress trajectory its not my problem if you have comprehension issue ....
BTW do you even know what a depress trajectory is ....??
allow me to help you to understand it
View attachment 200971
from the above attachment two thing is quit easily understandable
1- S-III was not fired in depressed trajectory as the its apogee (692 KM) is greater apogee (350 KM) of then the comparable class of missile by the range Angi-III
2- Short time of flight is not necessarily dependent on Depressed Trajectory
Now the question is was it fired with minimum energy trajectory ..... answer is no because of two reasons
First reason
View attachment 200975 on the basis of above attachment S-III should have achieved 550 KM apogee for the distance of 2750 KM (20% of 2750 KM= 550 KM)
but as stated previously in today's test the apogee was 692 KM so it was way above the minimum energy trajectory zone; here at this stage I would ask you to watch the video of the missile test shared in this previous pages of thread; the flight pattern appears like this
View attachment 200979
which is similar to this flight pattern
View attachment 200980
don't make fun of yourself everyone know who is a troll here ..... now no need of any further troll attempt....
Well I have proof of, that it was fired to its maximum possible range, a statement by ISPR itself..leaves no room for this "trajectory - reduced range" debate of yours.
I think The range of Shaheen must be more than 3000+ .
Seriously does a country have to wait and develops a new missile for 7 years just with range of 250+km to the former Shaheen 2?
Israel And Most Of India ust be under this missile . India's should build more ABM System.
Good Luck.
Good that you're joking !As for trembling... well, your nukes can't reach us and ours can reach you.