Hi,
Composites are very expensive first of all---then their operational life is not that great---they are extremely maintenance extensive---cracks underneath the skin are not visible---. Delamination is another problem---
Enjoy the read in the link---.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how...ome..69i57.14863j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
At the end of the day aluminum skin maybe fine for the JF17---but composite material on the JF17 would teach mechanics of future issues with the composite material.
Hi,
It is JH7A---it is still a younger aircraft---I believe came to service in 2004---.
The chinese got carried away showing off their new found technology building capabilities and they forgot the fundamentals and basics---the flight characteristics of an aircraft---the purpose and utility of an aircraft---.
The J16 is a great aircraft on its own merits---but cannot compete with the Jh7A's on low flight missions over ground or over the water---.
The primary utility of both the aircraft is different---. The JH7 built on the F111 Aardvark minus the swing wing---the J16 an off shoot of the SU27's---.
So no comparison---.
It is just like the US military vs US congress----.
Military---what do you like---the A10
Congress---what do you like---the F35.
Hi,
(when I use the term 'you' over here---it is a term in general and not directed at 'you')
Cock fights are good fights---. " The Eagle" knows that they are useful---don't you 'Eagle'---.
It gets the best information out of people---. They should happen more often and more frequently---.
That is how the information gets leaked out---.
But sometimes when I leak the actual information out in front of you and you start to make fun of me because your level of intelligence / intellect reaches just upto someone's knees---so then how to face it and what can be done about it---.
I have laid out the truth on the paper---but if have not been to room AB 9501 in area 51 how would you understand that what I am saying is the whole truth and nothing but the truth---.