CriticalThought
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2016
- Messages
- 7,094
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
There's a finite amount of fiscal resources in Pakistan. Yes, the entire package could be bought from Russia, but the PAF's stated requirement for off-the-shelf fighters has been at 30-40 (it can't procure many more at this time). So a full-package that's disconnected from the systems the PAF had already purchased (e.g., SD-10, C-802A, etc) will be very expensive and, in all likelihood, force a trade-off and opportunity costs elsewhere.
Secondly, we do have to dismiss things based on unknowns. The rational way to act is based on certain or known knowledge, not on things we don't know. So if we don't know if the Russians will be amenable to integrating first or third-party systems, then we should be cautious about proceeding with them.
Ultimately, the way forward with Russia will likely be in terms of developing core industrial inputs that will feed into Pakistani weapon systems, such as Project Azm. This will be easier for both sides.
But the Russian perspective isn't entirely unknown. We have examples in India and China. And any ambiguity should be resolved through dialog so we act on concrete information rather than assumptions. If resources are finite then we can make a start with an initial purchase of 6 and keep increasing. In the process, acquire MRO which should lower operating costs over time.
The same argument of finite resources can be applied in reverse. Any new fighter will be here to stay at least 30 - 50 years. Lets be honest with ourselves: will we never require a twin engine aircraft ever? You cannot answer that with yes, and I say the answer is no. Which is why I oppose yet another single engine being inducted.
In parallel, I agree we need Russian help in improving our core scientific, engineering, and industrial base. This is a no brainier and should be pursued on priority basis.