Pakistan Babur: +3, India Nirbhay: -4 (How did it come to this)

[Hassan Guy]

You mean Chinese HN-1B

That's a Klub missile,
Go back to wikipedia, you need to try a lot harder

 

[WaLeEdK2]

We should thank the Americans reverse engineering their tomahawks worked wonders.

 

[IHK_PK]

You guys should come of this wet delusion. India does not need any sophisticated missile to hit Sargodha. A 600km missile is more than enough for whole Pakistan.[/QUOTE]

And what will do after that.... wait for your second strike in awe.
If u do that u will not live to c what will happen with india.

 

[Bhupendra Singh_Cyan]

Now you are comparing republic with family, nice.

In a republic every citizen has right to information and goverment can not hide anything in India we have RTI where anyone can file an RTI and get information from public authority. I don't know how democracy in Pakistan works

Lol

 

[Gregor Clegane]

That's a Klub missile,
Go back to wikipedia, you need to try a lot harder
View attachment 372344
View attachment 372345

That's a HN-1B
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Cruise-Missiles.html

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/...ggdEpCAaWwlIbKWEgstj0ithACDz6-RLZnS3rIw[/IMG]

 

[GR!FF!N]

You can part test systems and then put them to gather for final testing. Once they are finally tested then announce to the world.
India beats it's chest before it does anything and that leads to failures

What you failed to comprehend is that even though every country test subsystems before final testing,it is bound to fail.I'm in software industry and even though we run countless testing on various level,it still fails from time to time.

Failure is not a "Setback",rather it increases test scope and and vulnerability,which might hamper operations when real need of these platforms will appear.It has nothing to do with chest thumping.Best of the best platforms fail from time to time during testing and its good that Scientists get a chance to fix these issues and it is the whole point of testing.

If a country has 100% success rate of its missiles,then either that country has abysmal testing standard or it is lying through its teeth.

Let me show you what is the success rate of best(Present) missiles in the world while testing -

Trident II - Even after so called 150 successful launch,recently 1 Trident missile malfunctioned(even though the missile is in service for over 25 years) when Britain launched one.Also it failed multiple times during testing.

https://news.usni.org/2017/01/25/ro...lfunction-prompts-claims-u-k-government-cover

Bulava - First 20 Test flights,6 failed.But even after induction,1 year back 2 missiles failed while launched.

M-51 - 1 Failed after 5 successful launch,almost 7 years after first launch.

JL-2 - Even though China is extremely secretive about its missile launch,they also agreed that JL-2 has failed in 2004.

Brahmos - 1 test failed due to GPS glitch.

Tomahawk - Multiple failed during test as well as during operation.

 

[Trango Towers]

You guys should come of this wet delusion. India does not need any sophisticated missile to hit Sargodha. A 600km missile is more than enough for whole Pakistan.

Firstly if that's your picture in your profile you need to lose weight. A lot of weight. Secondly you need to grow up and stop stupid comments and finally engage your brain before typing.

 

[Bratva]

What you failed to comprehend is that even though every country test subsystems before final testing,it is bound to fail.I'm in software industry and even though we run countless testing on various level,it still fails from time to time.

Failure is not a "Setback",rather it increases test scope and and vulnerability,which might hamper operations when real need of these platforms will appear.It has nothing to do with chest thumping.Best of the best platforms fail from time to time during testing and its good that Scientists get a chance to fix these issues and it is the whole point of testing.

If a country has 100% success rate of its missiles,then either that country has abysmal testing standard or it is lying through its teeth.

Let me show you what is the success rate of best(Present) missiles in the world while testing -

Trident II - Even after so called 150 successful launch,recently 1 Trident missile malfunctioned(even though the missile is in service for over 25 years) when Britain launched one.Also it failed multiple times during testing.

https://news.usni.org/2017/01/25/ro...lfunction-prompts-claims-u-k-government-cover

Bulava - First 20 Test flights,6 failed.But even after induction,1 year back 2 missiles failed while launched.

M-51 - 1 Failed after 5 successful launch,almost 7 years after first launch.

JL-2 - Even though China is extremely secretive about its missile launch,they also agreed that JL-2 has failed in 2004.

Brahmos - 1 test failed due to GPS glitch.

Tomahawk - Multiple failed during test as well as during operation.

Why are you mixing up Failed Designing vs random component failures during operational flights ? Even fighter jets crashed during operation, does it mean designing was bad ?

Nirbhay failure is team is unable to design DSMAC and TERCOM, its core navigational hardware. Nirbhay engine is russian. So it is not component failure nirbhay is facing but the indians inability to design a terecom and DSMAC

 

[Hassan Guy]

That's a HN-1B
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Cruise-Missiles.html

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/...ggdEpCAaWwlIbKWEgstj0ithACDz6-RLZnS3rIw[/IMG]

Thats a copy of the Kh series.

They don't look like Tomahawk's.

 

[ShoutB]

&when was that ....???

it was a block of dharmic religions. no one fought like Pakistanis do on the basis of religion.

 

[HRK]

it was a block of dharmic religions. no one fought like Pakistanis do on the basis of religion.

what a wonderful line of debate .... but plz may I know the exact time frame, period of history under which that AKHAND THING was ever in existence under a single ruling authority ....???

 

[ShoutB]

And what will do after that.... wait for your second strike in awe.
If u do that u will not live to c what will happen with india.

we already have K15 for that. you don't need ONLY a cruise missile

what a wonderful line of debate .... but plz may I know the exact time frame, period of history under which that AKHAND THING was ever in existence under a single ruling authority ....???

This might have been discussed here several times. Let's stay on topic of missile.

Why are you mixing up Failed Designing vs random component failures

Design is good the component failure is causing trouble. It is not possible that all components failed. One failed and caused the jam in other hence missile failed.

 

[HRK]

This might have been discussed here several times. Let's stay on topic of missile.

thnx you realized so early ... hope will restrain yourself posting such rants in future ....

India is reclaiming it's old position when it was Akhand Bharat!

 

[SecularNationalist]

Pakistani regime is not taking India for granted like the members here do posting about a missile failure 200 times. Because your regime knows India will find some way to develop it. As India does not stop with one model but keeps on testing new stuff.

You guys should come of this wet delusion. India does not need any sophisticated missile to hit Sargodha. A 600km missile is more than enough for whole Pakistan.

Whatever extra development India is doing is because India is reclaiming it's old position when it was Akhand Bharat!

Listen gupta Akhand bharat exist no where but definitely in your wet dreams.

 

[Gregor Clegane]

Thats a copy of the Kh series.

They don't look like Tomahawk's.

They look exactly like Babur.