Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Was Mariyam showed as dependent in nomination papers?Per law they cannot revisit 5 years old tax matters of any tax payer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was Mariyam showed as dependent in nomination papers?Per law they cannot revisit 5 years old tax matters of any tax payer.
No, the court never mixed larger bench with commission to be formulated.
.
Was Mariyam showed as dependent in nomination papers?
Was Mariyam showed as dependent in nomination papers?
So now only captain safdar is bali ka bakraYes, she was shown dependent. As per reply, now she's not & I am sure the army of lawyers at family disposal have something to defend - will that be acceptable, different debate altogether. Now it will be MS who has to prove why she isn't dependent anymore.
Oh ok... Maybe, i misunderstood...
Also, since..it is a .suo moto case now...so what abt Sh Rasheed's petition..which was a separate petition...related to perjury? Are all petitions..merged into one, now? Or sh Rasheeds petition can still be heard on its own?
He is indeed! Not bakra but a khota.So now only captain safdar is bali ka bakra
Yes, she was shown dependent. As per reply, now she's not & I am sure the army of lawyers at family disposal have something to defend - will that be acceptable, different debate altogether. Now it will be MS who has to prove why she isn't dependent anymore.
I was shocked to hear that SR submited his ToRs. His petition is entirely different, it doesn't question corruption but qualification of PM. His petition depends on final ToRs. It's suo moto now, that would also means completely different dynamics.
.
I was shocked to hear that SR submited his ToRs. His petition is entirely different, it doesn't question corruption but qualification of PM. His petition depends on final ToRs. It's suo moto now, that would also means completely different dynamics.
But the question remains can they amend his tax return filed in 2011 and reassess the tax? Section 122 of Income Tax Ordinance 2001 doesn't allow that.
That's the biggest change in this case. Now, the Supreme Court has unlimited jurisdiction in this case. It was good to see the SC Judges smack the head of the FIA.
That's the biggest change in this case. Now, the Supreme Court has unlimited jurisdiction in this case. It was good to see the SC Judges smack the head of the FIA.
It's apex court, it can order anything under article 187. Besides, revelations made by NS in his nomination papers for GE 2013 are more relevant I think.
But the question remains can they amend his tax return filed in 2011 and reassess the tax? Section 122 of Income Tax Ordinance 2001 doesn't allow that.
But that still leaves 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 open.