What's new

Pak Retains Terrorists in Reserve Against Indian Influence In Afg: US Def Int Chief Vincent Stewart

your *** is still reeling under fire despite creation of Bangladesh rather due to Bangladesh.
btw your 90 thousand figure is also flawd because almost half were soldiers families.
oo btw it was not invasion it was indian state terrorism and above all indians were still riding on the backs of east Pakistanis aka Bengali Pakistanis in 71. so basically Pakistanis broke east Pakistan away. indian hindus could not have done
Ok,,ok,,i may have messed up the numbers.
So half of thm were women n children(does it make thm non martial,,ok,if u say so,,they not martial)
N we did invade east pakistan,we did it after ur aggression on western border,,othrwise we wudnt have,,since we r a peaceful nation :angel:
PS-Btw my number 90k,is correct in another way.
Look at it in this way,,we crushed 90k martial marbles,,,taaadddaaaa :D
 
.
You are no one to dictate what influence an independent nation should carry.
Sorry but you should follow what we want.. Even if you are super power, pak will never allow anyone to install anti pak govt in Afghanistan
 
.
You do not have balls to invade any country not even Bangladesh so thank you for lucrative imagination.

By the way I replied to your stupid comment and not to the thread.

The thread topic is nothing new every country works for own interests including US

About bold part .
Check the geographic structure of partitioned British India and Subcontinent of 2017.
Then ask to yourselves .
Who got the balls?
 
.
You do not have balls to invade any country not even Bangladesh so thank you for lucrative imagination.

By the way I replied to your stupid comment and not to the thread.

The thread topic is nothing new every country works for own interests including US

So enlighten me on how Bangladesh came to be?
 
.
That may be so....but as you are well aware, recent geo-political realities have a way of shaping opinion about other nationalities and showing them in new light. Look at Pakistanis and Chinese for instance. I am sure I don't have to inform you about the chauvinistic views Mongoloids and South Asians (especially North Indians/Punjabis etc.) have for each other. Yet, hasn't steadfast friendship with China changed the outlook of Pakistanis to such an extent that many have only respect and admiration for the Chinese?

In recent years, Afghans have had a similar experience with India. Admittedly, the number of Afghans with a genuine national outlook is limited, as it is hardly a functional state, but then so would be the number of Pakistanis and Indians.

You cant correct some people. Because that is what they taught in their history.
Look at his words and there was a thread about this in PDF.
Like that UAE minister said India is India and Pakistan is Pakistan.
You cant compare both .Our western neighbourers want that our policies should only formulate according to their so called sensitivities .They want others to treat them as same as India.
It is like we are asking the world to consider India same as that of US .Something that is never going to happen.
They dont want India in Afghanistan because that creates some imaginary threat
 
. . . .
After him I am sure whole population of Sub continent has changed many times but pani pat is just 200 something year old and well documented event.

:cheers:

Not much .
But we were the first one that started that game.
 
.
You should also read about Ashoka :D
Ashoka did not like ti be a hindu and he was not a hindu. come again

So enlighten me on how Bangladesh came to be?
so for your bruised ego you imagine you invaded the current day Bangladesh?? the then east Pakistan. lolzzz good yar chalo kuch to ghaznavi babur ki di hoii jalan ko aram aya ho ga.
 
.
Ashoka did not like ti be a hindu and he was not a hindu. come again

When he conquered Afghanistan and all other land except Kalinga he was a Hindu and a brutal ,powerful one.
Buddhism is alsova Dharmic one born in this subcontinent

After him I am sure whole population of Sub continent has changed many times but pani pat is just 200 something year old and well documented event.

:cheers:

200 years or 2000 years .History is history and a proved one .You cant change that.
 
.
When he conquered Afghanistan and all other land except Kalinga he was a Hindu and a brutal ,powerful one.
Buddhism is alsova Dharmic one born in this subcontinent



200 years or 2000 years .History is history and a proved one .You cant change that.
If I open up history books ahem I mean facts you Hindus start embarrassing SO let's be it and do not to engage in it.
Oh your Hindu gods Vs another god or evils is different one You can keep it.
 
.
If I open up history books ahem I mean facts you Hindus start embarrassing SO let's be it and do not to engage in it.
Oh your Hindu gods Vs another god or evils is different one You can keep it.

That is the pathetic condition of history in your nation.And we can the effect in that nation,their rulers and ofcourse their people
 
.
Not much .
But we were the first one that started that game.

200 years or 2000 years .History is history and a proved one .You cant change that.
How you started game?Because most of Pashtun tribes came around beating Ashok's settlements from East Iran.
Later you would have knowledge about annihilation of kabul shahi by these tribes and there advent into India and rise of Delhi sultanat.
No my friend history is cruel,2000 matters a lot.
 
.
How you started game?Because most of Pashtun tribes came around beating Ashok's settlements from East Iran.
Later you would have knowledge about annihilation of kabul shahi by these tribes and there advent into India and rise of Delhi sultanat.
No my friend history is cruel,2000 matters a lot.

We were conquered those areas and local tribes created problems .Due to the Ashoka own tranformstion he spared all of them and Maurya empire degraded .
 
.
Back
Top Bottom