Pak Navy tests fire missiles, torpedo: ISPR

[Creder]

Observation: despite being hit amidships by a C 803 in fairweather conditions, the 40 + year old frigate did not sink!!! At least not in the videos!!! Two things -- the warhead was smaller and if fires were lit beacuse of the hit than with good fire control crew it could be brought under control and live to fight another day. Offcouse there was no ammo or cordite etc. onboard at the time. Second, there was no "Lifting" off the sea of the frigate when one witnesses such an explosion. Might be we can a get a closer shot later on.

Though I should share.

it did sink, the video was just a short segment..look through the thread it was all posted

 

[Aamir Hussain]

it did sink, the video was just a short segment..look through the thread it was all posted

Sir:

I did not the FRAMM or the Leander sink in any one of videos posted on this thread! Still wondering.

 

[mjnaushad]

Observation: despite being hit amidships by a C 803 in fairweather conditions, the 40 + year old frigate did not sink!!! At least not in the videos!!! Two things -- the warhead was smaller and if fires were lit beacuse of the hit than with good fire control crew it could be brought under control and live to fight another day. Offcouse there was no ammo or cordite etc. onboard at the time. Second, there was no "Lifting" off the sea of the frigate when one witnesses such an explosion. Might be we can a get a closer shot later on.

Though I should share.

If you see the picture above of australian navy and video of Pakistan navy missile. ONE BIG DIFFERENCE......our missile its on surface not under water. 2nd is the angle of hitting. if we hit from side angle under water. Kkkboom. but the missile tested were surface missile.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts .....much appreciated.

 

[Aamir Hussain]

If you see the picture above of australian navy and video of Pakistan navy missile. ONE BIG DIFFERENCE......our missile its on surface not under water. 2nd is the angle of hitting. if we hit from side angle under water. Kkkboom. but the missile tested were surface missile.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts .....much appreciated.

True! Thanks for the clarfiication. It makes sense.

 

[Tomahawk]

Another video of missile test:

 

[The Patriot]

I believe Indians and Pakitanis can live together peacefully.

I had seen them living peacefully in Gulf countires. There they help each other and support each other.

Indian Doctors treat pakistani patients and Pakistani doctors treat indian Patients. Both do their job lovingly and caringly.

I myself was treated by Pakistani doctor in Gulf and still I remember how caring he was..

In my company, I had seen a Pakistani Muslim arguing with Arab Manager for the salary hike of a Hindu Indian.

Also, many a time, I had seen that a Pakistani Muslim cannot go along with an Arab Musilm eventhough they had the same religion. What matters is culture and not religion.

My conclusion is when Indians and Pakistanis are away from Fundamentalists they can live together and by helping each other.

My observation is the same in few countries. When Pakistanis and Indians meet they forget their political differences and become friends in no time. We have almost the same culture and that makes us look a like.
You are right despite our friendship with gulf states ppl to ppl relations are non existent and they cant get along.

sorry got of the topic.

 

[razgriz19]

If you see the picture above of australian navy and video of Pakistan navy missile. ONE BIG DIFFERENCE......our missile its on surface not under water. 2nd is the angle of hitting. if we hit from side angle under water. Kkkboom. but the missile tested were surface missile.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts .....much appreciated.

there could be one more reason i think the warhead did not explode, the warhead always explodes few seconds after it hit its target, but i dont think it did, or the missiles weren't armed with any warhead!!
but anyway, thos test atleast proves that chinese missiles are very RELIABLE!!!
Another thing, the missile hit the ship from rear! a much harder angle for an anti-ship missile to hit its target!!!BUT IT DID HIT IT!!

 

[T-Rex]

Here you can see when missile is about to hit the ship.I have posted earlier , video from bbc news. you can pause at 22 seconds on bbc website video. then you can see that missile is coming from the back side.

Furthermore i have attached the photo of missile coming

It would have been more realistic if it was a moving target. In real life situation the targets are usually moving. Hitting a stationary target is one thing and hitting a moving target is a different story.

 

[razgriz19]

It would have been more realistic if it was a moving target. In real life situation the targets are usually moving. Hitting a stationary target is one thing and hitting a moving target is a different story.

moving target means putting lives at risk!

 

[T-Rex]

moving target means putting lives at risk!

Not quite, you could do it with the help of remote control. The Israelis are known to have used remote controlled moving targets for accuracy test of their weapons.

 

[Windjammer]

It would have been more realistic if it was a moving target. In real life situation the targets are usually moving. Hitting a stationary target is one thing and hitting a moving target is a different story.

Once the radar or the seeker in the missile head acquires, picks up and locks onto it's target, the vessel whether static or sailing is doomed.

 

[Windjammer]

C-602

subsonic anti-ship missile
Specification:

* Length: 6.1 metres
* Diameter: 0.54 metres
* Weight: 1.24 ton (including the 110 kg booster)
* Warhead: 300 kg
* Minimum speed: Mach 0.6
* Maximum speed: Mach 0.9+
* Cruising altitude over sea: 7-10 metres
* Cruising altitude over ground: 30 metres
* Maximum range: > 400 km and 280 km for export version [3]
* Minimum range: 40 to 60 km, depending on the type and size of the target
* Engine: turbojet with solid rocket booster
* Guidance: inertial + active radar
* Maximum target speed: 30 kt

C-802
Weight 715 kg
Length 6.392 m
Diameter 36 cm
Warhead 165 kg time-delayed semi-armour-piercing high-explosive
Engine turbojet engine
Wingspan 1.22 m (unfolded); 0.72 m (folded)
Operational
range ~500 km (C-805); 350+ km (C-803); 180 km (C-802A); 120 km (C-802)[1]
Flight altitude 3-5 m (attacking); 5-7 m (cruising)[1]
Speed Mach 0.9[1]
Guidance
system Inertial and terminal active radar
Launch
platform ground-based vehicles, naval ships, fixed-wing aircraft

 

[mughaljee]

Brother's
Clear on thing, by Augsta-90, we fired a tarpedo or a missile?

 

[maverick1977]

we fired SM39 exocet from Agosta90B. I am assuming this is new version of SM39 as we had alreayd tested SM39 from agosta 70s before. Its only logical why would PN otherwise test the same missile again.

if thats the case then can anyone comment on if PN got a newer version of SM39 from france with agosta 90B ?

 

[razgriz19]

we fired SM39 exocet from Agosta90B. I am assuming this is new version of SM39 as we had alreayd tested SM39 from agosta 70s before. Its only logical why would PN otherwise test the same missile again.

if thats the case then can anyone comment on if PN got a newer version of SM39 from france with agosta 90B ?

correction, agosta 70 dont carry exocets, they carry harpoon.....
we've tested exocets few times from agosta 90b!