How so?
In 1948, we managed to capture 1/3 of Kashmir and still hold it.
In 1965, it was a stalemate. And the fact that India was numerically superior to Pakistan speaks volumes of the kind fight power Pakistan displayed.
In 1971, our Army was totally cut off in Bangladesh. And many Strong military powers faced with similar circumstances have surrendered. Such as British in Tobruk and Singapore in 1942, Americans in Bataan in 1942, Germans in Stalingrad in 1942, or French in Dien Bien Phu in 1953, etc.
In 1999, we successfully infiltrated into Kargil and held you guys at bay for months.
And lets not forget India lost bad when they send troops to Sri Lanka in 1987.
I am sorry to contradict you, but the Arguments demand it.
In 1948, you captured 1/3 of the state by mounting an attack on unsuspecting State troops, barely fit to bear arms. When the Indian Army came in, those same all-conquering heroes charged back fairly fast. You also omit to mention that you could have captured the whole state if your heroes had not stopped to rape, loot and murder. But those don't fall into the list of major victories, presumably, only the minor list.
In 1965, again, it was an unprovoked attack on a peaceful country, the second within months. Considering the amount of effort you spent, using large numbers of SSG commandos dressed up as native militants (rather familiar - it was the same story in Kargil, with NLI instead of SSG), a full-scale armoured attack frustrated only by the imbecile behaviour of your own high command, it is curious that you consider this a stalemate. None of your war objectives were met, not the military ones, anyway. Bhutto got what he wanted, the removal of one more obstacle to the throne, but the military didn't. Our objective was to throw the invaders out. We met ours. An armed mugger attacks a peaceful citizen, the peaceful citizen fights him off successfully, and you report it as a draw?
In 1971, it was a defeat. There are many instances in history of defeats. So what? Defeat is defeat. Nobody asked you to stick an army into a tight corner and simultaneously provoke a war.
In 1999, it was another failed felony, armed burglary this time, rather than a mugging. How does a failed felony entitle you to aggrandize yourselves? Or to claim military distinction, or credit?
Lastly, were you disguised as LTTE in 1987? if not, what was the point you wanted to make?