thanks to the traitor of Pakistan NAWAZ, its our mistakes to dialogue rather then their denyyes i have seen what we got from USA in last 5 years . oppppps nothing at all
No J-11/16 options available. Fan boys need to get this thing right.
Nothing was expected. IKs visit has given a ray of Hope, as have been assurances from the Kushner Lobby in DC.yes i have seen what we got from USA in last 5 years . oppppps nothing at all
Typhoon extremely expensive 150+ million $$$, J-10 already rejected by PAF on technical bases, And how about MIG-35 it is cheaper than Su-35 and Russia would like sell it and not problem for India @Ark_Angel
China can't export J-11/J-16 because design is RUSSIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (based on Su-27/Su30 air frame) when deal were happening with Russia, Russian put clause that Chinese will not Sell Su-30/Su-27 and its variants to third parties @Ark_Angel
If this offer comes with local assembly/production. I say take it and run
I thinks for both, it multi role jet you know bro
Agin False Assumptions. J-10C is a beast in Air. And has respect with in the fighter community. PAF has never rejected it(still the best/realistic option by Far). Only issue is keeping in view Priorities. V upgrade is the First and all focus is on that. SU-35 or Euro due to dual engine nature of the fighter and an major capability boost(read Payload and Electronics) as Future(read AZM) is Dual and new TTPs are to be designed for that.
No Naval AVN Wing is in process. Navy only to rely on Fixed wing/rotors.
No local assembly. $$$$$ is a scarce and a valuable resource. You don’t go for local production/assembly for every damn bird. Your hands are full with Thunder already!
We are using J-10C tech on our upcoming Block-3 JF-17 so what is the difference though with exception of range/payload what is the difference tell me and JF-17 project using J-10 tech from day one , Su-35/EF-2000 is extremely expensive, 80-150+ million $$$, whereas MIG-35 has price tag of 45 million $$$ and its also have 2 engine @Ark_Angel
Irrespective of it's production method this is an aircraft (J10) PAF should have been flying right now rather than considering
So i saying that currently NAVAL fixed wing have Mirages (currently in transition of being replace by JF-17), P-3C/ATR-72/CN-235 MPA and lots of light transport aircraft etc, if we will get Su-35 its used on scenarios ( NAVAL and DEEP STRIKE BY PAF INTO ENEMY TERRITORY) @Ark_Angel
J-10C offers something which currently PAF lacks. Time(read: Readily Aval Platform/Mature/Numbers) AESA radar and VLAAMs. Block 3 is still under dev phase while the req is Urgent. Moreover it’s also a false assumption that J-10C tech makes way to Thunder. They are 2 separate birds. Chinese are not bound to share anything with us. It’s only the Req. Req is forwarded and they respond with their own Firms. From electronics to all else JF-17 has a different eco system altogether.
Bloody nation is impatient as anything...
First of all thank you for your valuable contribution to PDF...members like yourself and @Khafee make the forum worthwhile to visit...just wanted to know how would you rate a J10C against a V upgraded F16...Thanks
Depends on the load out. J-10C with the new EW Pod and PL-15s can lob at anything that comes its way.
