Cookie Monster
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
- Messages
- 3,975
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
Mastan Uncle...I replied to u(for one of our previous discussion) a while back...wrote on ur wall too. I'm awaiting ur reply...if u have some time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mastan Uncle...I replied to u(for one of our previous discussion) a while back...wrote on ur wall too. I'm awaiting ur reply...if u have some time.
Don't they complement eachother?Why you thinks that we have not the capability to build radar, we have the capability to built radar for F-7PG/Mirages via Italy (TOT) grifo series of radar @Philip the Arab and don't divert the topic you're continuously diverting the topic, this thread is for projected purchased of F-16V not JF-17 @Philip the Arab
Yes of course nothing in this world is free...but as we discussed before small countries like Pak...if they wish to stand up to a bigger country(like India) instead of being bossed around then there is no choice but to rely on countries like US or China, or some other major power. This essentially turns into a "give and take relationship", if they r going to help out Pak then conversely Pak must help them out. I just hope that this time Pak plays it smart and doesn't end up being used and discarded...but rather use this opportunity to build a multidimensional long term relationship.
F-16 doesn't have the radar scatting fuselages/coatings/treatments etc etc and last if they will do upon customer request then it will expensive and weapons bays makes least effect on F-16 RCS @Philip the ArabDoes anyone think it is possible to make a stealth F-16 like F-15SE? F-16 RCS is reportedly 1m2 and J-20 is all 0.1-1m2. So if you could make weapons internal and add RAM coating it would make it have an even lower RCS. Don't know how realistic this is...
again you diverting the topic, stay on topic you idiot @Philip the ArabDon't they complement eachother?
weapons bays
Last but not the least, Pakistan's oil reserves slightly more than the UK's at 21bn BBL (min) doesn't hurt either. By comparison Oman's Reserves are at 5.3bn BBL (approx).
Once all options are exploited, Pakistan will be exporting 1.2m bpd ~ 1.4m bpd. (this figure is after deducting domestic consumption).
sir you made my dayThe Question is: "Why is the US reaching out to the Pakistan?"
Two reasons:
1) China - Pakistan has slid so far into the Chinese camp, that is now a de facto province. Something which is extremely worrying for the Americans.
The Feb hostilities saw 3 PLAAF squadrons go to standby - in order to assist Pakistan if needed. PLAN sent 4 SSK , and 3 boomers, at least two Type 55 destroyers, other assets were also sent later after the ISI chiefs visit. PLA also went to full war time alert, ready to move in.
This is the main reason why IN choose to sleep out the hostilities.
2) India - I told someone from the west, a year ago, "building India up against China, is like making the village idiot your sheriff"
He laughed it off, but he quietly made a note, scribbled away, while looking at me straight in the eye.
India's incompetence hasn't gone unnoticed, neither has them becoming an economic threat to the US. To contain them, and move Pak away from the Chinese camp, to whatever extent possible. These are the two goals.
The US has a list of some 10~20 companies that are critical to National Security, LM, Boeing Raytheon, Cisco etc. Sensitive data has been steadily flowing to India, China, Russia, Israel, courtesy of Indians. The deep state has realized its folly, AND no president will work against the deep state.
The trade balance being lopsided, doesn't help them either.
As far as people giving all the credit to Afgh for this revert, If any of you remember the Muree talks, it was decided THEN, that should the US exit, Pak will insure that its interests are looked after adequately.
Imran Khan, wants to make a change, a fundamental change in Pak, but decades old rot, bogs him down. He also has the support of the Army. All these things combined, has assured the US that Pakistan can be a useful ally after all.
Last but not the least, Pakistan's oil reserves slightly more than the UK's at 21bn BBL (min) doesn't hurt either. By comparison Oman's Reserves are at 5.3bn BBL (approx).
Once all options are exploited, Pakistan will be exporting 1.2m bpd ~ 1.4m bpd. (this figure is after deducting domestic consumption).
InShaAllah great times ahead
Pakistan Zindabad
This deal if it materializes(in combination with JF17 block III) for sure will balance out IAF's Rafales and considerable numbers of Su30MKI and Mirage 2K. I assume the immediate "payment" would be ensuring a smooth exit of US from Afghanistan and helping install a government(Afghan Taliban...or maybe Afghan Taliban in coalition with some other powerful factions) that will cater to US interests in Afghanistan to an extent. This is fine from a security perspective (Pak's security perspective)...as long as India's designs of having a second front for Pak(from Afghanistan) is neutralized.This is a carrot from the US.
The sticks didn't work earlier.
I'm not sure what exactly their plans are.
But no matter, for Pakistan, this is great news.
Like I said, grab as many as you can this time.
As we have seen, the US attitude towards Pakistan is transactional and fickle. (Although with Trump its not business as usual anywhere in the world.)
This F-16 deal obviously would be most bang for the buck for PAF for obvious reasons.
LOL.
BS Dhanoa is probably crying in a corner next to his Rafale statue right about now.
View attachment 571010
Your source please. Very outlandish claim1)PAF will be getting 18~24 NEW Blk70 or 72's for now.
2)The current fleet will be upgraded to "V" specs. All of them.
Depending on the condition of the air-frame, some or all, will go through SLEP to 12k hrs.
This Breaking News, is a gift for all those people who stood by me, when I was unfairly banned. Thank You!
Fuselage is not and add more RCS for those weapon pod for F-16 @GIANTsasquatch*weapons pod
I think we should not be limited to f16s but also focus on other fighterjets program to maintain air superiority
only one tech doesn't make F-16 a true stealth jet but reduce RCS F-16 @member.exe
First to clarify to people, but F-16V is the designation for Block 70/72. Just like Block 60 ones are labeled as F-16E/F.Well as @Khafee has stated that they are Block 72, which means they're going to be brand-spanking-new off the assembly line in South Carolina.
No AirForce currently has the Block 70/72
Emmm, not that i'm questioning your reply, but there are quite a few other AirForces that have placed (confirmed) orders.
1. Bahrain
2. Slovakia
3. Iraq
4. Morocco
5. Taiwan (debatable)
6. Bulgaria
But then, it all depends on whom they'd like to prioritize.