BDforever
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 14,387
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
but Patria can
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but Patria can
Not all of them. If you wish amphibious capabilities you need to reduce the weight, and that means, lesser ballistic protection... And they are more expensive than the versions without amphibious capabilities.but Patria can
It is unfortunate that in many cases Americam junk is better then many frontline products. But more importantly PA needs such vehicles badly not only PA but civil law enforcement agencies too.So again we're going to be stuck with American junk
What happened to the Lazar 2 ???
It is unfortunate that in many cases Americam junk is better then many frontline products. But more importantly PA needs such vehicles badly not only PA but civil law enforcement agencies too.
Pakistan Army's MRAP requirements are unique and both Lazar-2 and MaxxPro are simply stop-gap measures. A little while ago I heard that the Army was offered some Italian MRAP's (used in Afghanistan as well) provided Pakistan could pick them up from Italian Port. For this Pakistan has done some action but I am not sure if the Italian MRAP's have arrived yet or not.
Again, shame on HIT that it cannot properly and on its own develop such a vehicle. The Burraq was a poor copy of the Israeli CAT MRAP/ IFV. Considering the areas where Pakistan needs IED protection, these behemoths will not be able to turn around at any path on mountainous terrain and will have high chances of getting stuck, toppling over with a force of a strong IED or worse being rammed into with an explosives laden vehicle.
I still think that owing to lack of vision, planning and all important cash-in-hand, this will be another one of those pipe dreams!
All of the above requires money, which should have been spent to develop an indigenous vehicle to begin with.
Money would be spent no matter what we buy or build. Any piece of equipment requires maintenance regardless of origin. Point is that I do not see much of an issue with maintaining equipment which is based upon freely available commercial product.
Let me take engine filters for example. These require periodic replacement and are easy to make. Get me any filter, and I can have it replicated for less than a few dozen dollars in Lahore.
Lets take the example of piston engine or wheel bearings. These things are not like jet engine bearings. Fairly easy to get and replace.
Let us take disk brake pads. These entail no rocket science. Aircraft brakes are far more challenging. MaxxPro brake pads would be child's play in comparison.
Try to come up with one example that we can not manufacture or procure in Lahore or Karachi, and I shall concede the point.
Hi,
I think you are over simplifying stuff, our economy would be burdened because we would have to set up separate units for the manufacturing of these parts, (considering they are not standard). While an indigenous solution wouldn't have caused these problems, remember that burraq was based on a chassis and components that could've been supported by our local industry. So, let's not only look at technical side of this situation.
Sir ji those land rovers are assembled/produced in Pak by Sigma motors..
But than again ur right why would we bed manufacturing units etc for spares for a few hundred vehicles when we can just import them...
Yaraaa waisee hum itneii nakameiiin haiiin keh eiiik kaaam kiii MRAP bhiii nahin banaa sakteiii & we've thought about procuring them only now after so many years of our soldiers paying the price with their lives & limbs !
I would like to question your assumptions here.
How do you know that we would have to setup separate units for manufacturing of parts that need to be replaced (in periodic maintenance)? Why can't limited production be outsourced to local manufacturers if needed? Why are you assuming that we would have a problem in sourcing these parts? Considering that moving parts are mostly related to chassis and engine that are likely commercial products, why would we have a problem? What makes MaxxPro any different from any other piece of imported equipment? I hope you notice Range Rover vehicles in PA use. Do we have a problem maintaining those?
Even if we develop an 'indigenous' product, we still would be importing engines, disk brakes, Gear box, etc... from other countries, since our industry does not produce these independently at a competitive price and at a competitive quality level. If we obsess about focus on 'indigenization', we would be making mistakes similar to the ones made by India.
If it comes to it, we could reverse engineer this thing. It is not rocket science. It is just a pod stuck atop a chassis.
I would not say corruption as such. Its just that government and its institution have no business being in business.Reminds me of stuff like Yasoob,PIFV.. Burraq MRAP.. Etcetera ... Corruption?
This thinking got us our bloody steel mill which has been an unmitigated disaster for our economy in general, and engineering industry in particular.