Obama: Iran can have a nuclear program

[IranZamin]

Iran is going down the path of Saddan Hussain. Instead of Playing diplomatically and providing guarantee to America that it's a civilian nuclear program all sanctions will be removed and Iran can then make himself strong.

But the current path will not make Iran stronger in Longer run

Saddam ? dude... how can you compare IR's powerful political system with a dictator who had no sight/control on the internal affairs of his country. The warmongering and arrogant attitude of the Baath party led to the invasion of their country, hanging of their head of state and collapse of their system.
IR is much more powerful than you can imagine

 

[Bratva]

I don't think Iranians are going down Iraq path at all. He was a friend of America.

Your thinking does not reflect realities on ground.

 

[hawx]

Iran should go all out to get nukes. remember what happened to Libya after they gave up nukes. On the other hand North Korea and Pakistan are fine

we sure have a different understanding of the word fine.If you call today's pakistan fine its hard to imagine worst.

 

[longbrained]

Iran is going down the path of Saddan Hussain. Instead of Playing diplomatically and providing guarantee to America that it's a civilian nuclear program all sanctions will be removed and Iran can then make himself strong.

But the current path will not make Iran stronger in Longer run

Iran is on the right path. And Saddam was a western crony and puppet unlike Iran which is free. By the way, Saddam did not have anything. All he had was given to him by west and then taken back later so he could not defend himself. Just compare it for yourself in these videos:

 

[Secur]

Bowing down , Yanks ?

 

[lem34]

Your thinking does not reflect realities on ground.

In your opinion. Don't remember Saddam having China investing 100 billion US in Iraq??

 

[longbrained]

Well, I'm in favor of denuclearizing India, for that some of our neighbors have to take the initiative. And a nuclear armed India has never been a threat to Iran. While a nuclear armed China and Pakistan (count USA too in the 70s) has always been a threat to us.

The problem is Iran's enemies US, France, UK, Israel will not denuclearize any time soon. So your point is moot.

 

[Bratva]

Saddam ? dude... how can you compare IR's powerful political system with a dictator who had no sight/control on the internal affairs of his country. The warmongering and arrogant attitude of the Baath party led to the invasion of their country, hanging of their head of state and collapse of their system.
IR is much more powerful than you can imagine

So who is showing arrogant attitude on Nuclear program? If its a civilian then why dont you guys become transparent in your nuclear dealings ?

 

[lem34]

we sure have a different understanding of the word fine.If you call today's pakistan fine its hard to imagine worst.

better off than hundreds of millions of Indians and Gadaffi & co who gave up nuclear program

So who is showing arrogant attitude on Nuclear program? If its a civilian then why dont you guys become transparent in your nuclear dealings ?

The issue is why should Israelis a nation of 4 million dictate to anyone

 

[Skull and Bones]

The problem is Iran's enemies US, France, UK, Israel will not denuclearize any time soon. So your point is moot.

France and UK has never been an enemy of Iran, and US is just responding to the concerns of paranoid Israel.

 

[Bratva]

better off than hundreds of millions of Indians and Gadaffi & co who gave up nuclear program



The issue is why should Israelis a nation of 4 million dictate to anyone

The issue is Iran should make it self strong before showing such theatrics which Israel shows.

 

[IranZamin]

France and UK has never been an enemy of Iran, and US is just responding to the concerns of paranoid Israel.

you are in no position to say who is Irans enemy or not. The 2 countries you mentioned, especially the last one has been the source of instability in Iran

 

[lem34]

you are in no position to say who is Irans enemy or not. The 2 countries you mentioned, especially the last one has been the source of instability in Iran

Agreed UK policy is like Americans say jump and the Brits say how high sir??

 

[Serpentine]

So who is showing arrogant attitude on Nuclear program? If its a civilian then why dont you guys become transparent in your nuclear dealings ?

Dear longbrained,PGK,Iranzamin,Aryan_b and other fellas,you know how i feel when someone says 'Why isn't Iran acting transparent and opening all of it's nuclear facilities to IAEA and blah blah'
So this time,i won't answer, Self Control Mode: On

 

[longbrained]

Agreed UK policy is like Americans say jump and the Brits say how high sir??

Some people say it is the other way around. But it is not really important. They are one and the same thing.

Dear longbrained and other fellas,you know how i feel when someone says 'Why isn't Iran acting transparent and opening all of it's nuclear facilities to IAEA and balh blah'
So this time,i won't answer, Self Control Mode: On

It is not important. Those who matter know the truth. Iran is a powerful country and will become even more powerful. Even US does not know what to do. Hillary Clinton just day before yesterday had said, we can not attack Iran since the consequences are so grave and we can not allow Iran to have nukes since consequences are so grave. Who cares? Right?

Iran has been inspected by IAEA more than any other country. There are tens of thousands of IAEA cameras in Iran sending live feed 24/7 to Mossad HQ. And they are still afraid. So let them die of this fear.