Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
 India could play similiar tricks like china. Want earn money,transfer your tech at first.
Chinese should feel shame of india's achievement for e.g
HAL completed design studies in 1975, It came from the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) programme, which began in the 1980s to replace India's aging MiG-21 fighters. Later, the LCA was officially named "Tejas"
1975 -LCA
1976 -LCA
1977 -LCA
1978 -LCA
1979 -LCA
1980 -LCA
1981 -LCA
1982 -LCA
1983 -LCA
1984 -LCA
1985 -LCA
1986 -LCA
1987 -LCA
1988 -LCA
1989 -LCA
1990 -LCA
1991 -LCA
1992 -LCA
1993 -LCA
1994 -LCA
1995 -LCA
1996 -LCA
1997 -LCA
1998 -LCA
1999 -LCA
2000 -LCA
2001 -LCA
2002 -LCA
2003 -LCA
2004 -LCA
2005 -LCA
2006 -LCA
2007 -LCA
2008 -LCA
2009 -LCA
2010 -LCA
2011 -LCA
2012 -LCA
Qualitatively Chinese produce defence systems are at least generation behind
Some old school idea about china 20years ago.....As far as Indian armed force is concerned, the main issue regarding China is the Quantity not Quality. Qualitatively Chinese produce defence systems are at least generation behind its European/US/Russian counterparts and if we see the top fighters available in PLAF and IAF, IAF is qualitatively far superior and therefore until china reaches at par with the west/Russia our only concern is its numerical superiority. To counter this numerical superiority, India have to get the state of the art defence systems and make training and strategy cutting edge. Also, we have to develop a ultra modern defence eco system to utilise each component efficiently just as US do.
Russian and European 4.5 gen fighters already showing these capabilities and both also have shown their capabilities with stealth design as well.
China on the otherside has still to prove that is even close to these countries in most of these fields let alone the US. Taking US and Russian stealth designs and mixing them is one point, developing an own stealth design another. The Eurocanards are supermaneuverable, offers supercruise capabilities and NG avionics, Chinese 4th gen fighters don't.
China has a good pace, but will still need time to reach the same level and that is something that many people forget.
Beside Russian Pak/Fa to be claimed as 5 gen, Euro-canards fighters such Rafale and typhoon are only two 'S'--> super maneuvrability and super-electronic but sorry to say this, its still not considered as super cruise nor real stealth...of course that doesn't mean they can't come up with 5 gen fighter, the question is with current financial situation...can't they afford?
Some old school idea about china 20years ago.....
If you can prove it otherwise I am all ears. It is good to produce all the equipments indigenously however how it compares with the state of the art is other thing to consider. Everyone knows that China is playing catching up game in terms of hi-tech defence systems. One simply cannot replace trillions of dollars of R&D and decades of research effort with copying the final product. Cheap made in China products are good for western companies to make profit as they do all R&D at their countries and China just produce them. So until China stop copying and producing cheap stuff, and come up with innovative new systems, it will always play the catch up game.
As far as Indian armed force is concerned, the main issue regarding China is the Quantity not Quality. Qualitatively Chinese produce defence systems are at least generation behind its European/US/Russian counterparts and if we see the top fighters available in PLAF and IAF, IAF is qualitatively far superior and therefore until china reaches at par with the west/Russia our only concern is its numerical superiority. To counter this numerical superiority, India have to get the state of the art defence systems and make training and strategy cutting edge. Also, we have to develop a ultra modern defence eco system to utilise each component efficiently just as US do.
- inducting and operating Mig 29K in different roles will give IN experience, because these fighters are ready developed and available now, not in 6 years or so
- developing an N-LCA tech demonstrator (the first 6 N-LCA prototypes based on the LCA MK1), gives Indian industry experience in navalising a fighter for carrier operations, not developing a full fledged combat varient, with bigger numbers, that's just a waste of time and money
jointly develop FGFA will give Indian industry the experience to develop a stealth fighter, not developing LCA
He is right.Rafale locked even f-22
Chinese surely have quantity edge over india but not quality.
You ppl can surely copy the air frames but not other than this as u proved earlier
Beside Russian Pak/Fa to be claimed as 5 gen, Euro-canards fighters such Rafale and typhoon are only two 'S'--> super maneuvrability and super-electronic but sorry to say this, its still not considered as super cruise nor real stealth...of course that doesn't mean they can't come up with 5 gen fighter, the question is with current financial situation...can't they afford?
As for China, I mentioned before that we don't care how many 'S' we could achieve, we just moved forward...as long as the J-20 and J-31 design specifications meet the PLAAF requirements...and much better than what we have in inventory such J-10 and J-11.