This laws primary purpose is to protect Hindu illegal migrants from Migrants in Assam. There would have been no need for this amendment had all the illegals had been identified as Muslims. But the BJP govt cannot bring it a law specifically targetting Assam as SC is already monitoring the implementation of Assam Accords. The migrants from Pakistan is awfully low.
The difficulty with dealing with your arguments is that they are very difficult to understand.
What does this mean, for example: "....to protect Hindu illegal migrants from Migrants in Assam..."? Are you saying that Muslims are to be expelled selectively and that Hindus are to be retained? Are you aware that the people of Assam, and most particularly those organisations that had agitated against the illegal migration problem particularly, the AASU and the AAGSP, to name two, have explicitly stated that they want ALL to be expelled, not just Muslims alone? That their movement is against all who are not original natives of Assam?
How do you think these two views will be reconciled, in the first place, and what good will a law, any law do, in the absence of the support of the local people?
Second, how do you think this blatant religious discrimination will pass the references to the courts that are inevitable?
You go on to say, in your rather opaque language, that the migrants from Pakistan is awfully low. Whatever does this mean? Where does Pakistan come into the picture, or did you mean Bangladesh that was originally East Pakistan?
To your other question whether NRC will be implemented throughout India? Yes it will be. Whether it's BJP or the Congress. Ex HM PC already clarified it's need and they will implement it when they are in power using diff law. So I am not sure why you are any other should resist the idea of NRC. India at some point in her time needs to identify who her citizens are. What we can and should make sure is NRC is non discriminatory.
Flatly contradicts your own opening paragraph.
The question. Will CAA be used for people who don't have whatever docs NRC asks to publish and reject those people who are Muslims? It is a huge possibility. But I do not see how Tamil or Mallu speaking Muslims will be from BD or Pakistan.
How will that matter to rabid religious bigots? Do you think that having found that someone is technically unqualified to be a citizen of India according to the rules of the NRC, a government like the BJP one in power will then suddenly be overcome by a vast wave of sympathy and kindness on hearing the rejected citizens speaking in Tamil or in Malayalam? Do you think they care where the Muslims trapped in their net come from?
Infact even Pakistani Muslim illegals in India is damn low. It's only from Bangladesh that illegals have been detected and deported far and wide of this nation. The only risky people in these whole case scenario are Bengali Muslims particularly living in Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai and Assam. I am not belittling their status or fear factor but that's the practical possibility.
This with a sweep of the arm and with NO data to back it up but urban legend. Wonderful.
If and the last if, the NRC criteria has to come out and should have state govt to implement it. I do not see Kerala or TN or AP or WB or Bihar implementing the NRC in the first place. I am not going to defend or oppose NRC process till I see the draft of documents required.
Right. Wait until you can see to the bottom of the Falls before deciding whether or not you want to ride down Niagara Falls in a barrel.
Very intelligent, very far-sighted. And very likely to be effective if there is a grossly distorted procedure proposed.
In all you still haven't answered my question why the law is bad morally in the first place? Why is the demand of treating all illegals equally when they are treated unequally in the first place in their host countries?
This is either naive or knavish. Nobody is arguing FOR illegal immigrants, even though your fundamental proposition that the Hindu counts for more than the Muslim is questionable. It is not that at all, and if you haven't got it so far, you should be discussing the results of blind-testing Coke vs. Pepsi, not these issues.
The whole point is that the existing Muslim citizenry of the country is at risk from the ruthless manipulations of this government. We have seen in case after case after case that they go out of their way to victimise Muslims; the charge-sheets in the Delhi riots are a case in point. It is not about illegal immigrants; it was NEVER about illegal immigrants. This is the BJP's step to harass and to make miserable the existing legal citizens of India who happen to be Muslim.
If you haven't got it so far, you need some serious counselling.
You also need to improve your language. It is almost incomprehensible.
)
