Hi,
Oh is it now, so what right does jews have to annex it
So invaders havent attacked on unarmed flotilla which went to end bloakcade of oppressors ?
So, Invaders haven't imposed harsh condition on poor innocents fishers ?
So invaders havent build illegal settlements which are not recognized by global community
Have I claimed that they have the rights,to annex it?
The Ships to Gaza flottilla committed a war crime, by not stopping for the legal inspection.
This makes it legal to take control over the vessel, by force, if the flottilla poses resistance.
The people making resistance have forfeited their status as civilians
and now have all the rights of an enemy soldier in Close Quarter combat.
Gaza is under blockade, which is an act of war.
What fishers can/can't do is regulated by laws of warfare not by civilian laws.
There has certainly been settlements built in the West Bank,
some are considered legal and some not by the Israeli Supreme court.
The settlements consider legal by the Israeli Supreme Court are not considered
legal by many/most countries.
The settlements
inside Israel pre-67 borders is not considered legal by many
(Primarily Muslim) countries, while the rest of the world considers them legal.
Public opinion has very little to do what actually is right.
So called experts on International Law have difficulty agreeing
on what is legal on much smaller issues than the settlements.
Whether they are actually illegal needs to be proven in court.
There are no short nor long term plans to ever bring that up in court as far as I know.
Just to show the compexity. assume there was a Jewish Settlement on the West Bank.
The inhabitants fled to the new state of Israel in 1948.
They moved back and reclaimed the settlement after 1967.
Is that illegal?
Another argument from Israel is that there is no state which has legal claim to the area.
It is therefore up for grabs. Not an argument which flies with a lot of experts on
International Law, but still all arguments must be considered
Unlike settlements, the list I provided are of crimes that cannot be questioned.
Noone sane considers building a house on someone elses property
worse than cutting the throat of an infant.
We have a democratically elected government , we are not occupying any people nor seized any land that does not belong to us. What is your problem with Pakistan, please do not compare us to that fascist state Israel that projects it self as a liberal democracy, the truth is that nothing could be further from the truth.
You have a democratically elected government today, but situations can
change quickly, and has done so often in the history of Pakistan.
I think that many Indians would disagree with You on Kashmir.
You are occupying western Kashmir in their view.
From Wiki:
Fascists believe that
liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a
totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.
[7]Such a state is led by a strong leader—such as a
dictator and a
martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party—to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society.
Just show You have no clue.