The only people who will share naval technology know how are the Russians for e.g the Arihant.
Depending on what naval vessel, the Europeans or some Asian countries provide ToT too and it is very likely that we got some benefits for Arihant through the Scorpene deal too, the French also assist the Brazilians in developing a nuclear propulsion.
The better thing to do would be to tie up with them, like we have for the FGFA/PakFA for catapult systems. And then look for a joint creation of a next generation carrier warship class.
A joint development as said would be very risky and by the fact that the numbers of such systems would be very low, it would be qestionable if that would be useful. The best way imo would be getting catapults from the US and jointly develop a CATOBAR carrier with DCNS for us, Brazil and possibly even French navy in future. That could be even combined with a joint N-AMCA development, that benefits all 3 naval aviation fleets.
If we don't get catapults there is no need to join with the Russians to develop a carrier, since IAC2 would just be a bigger IAC1, which would reduce development and production time by far. Only joint naval Pak Fa / FGFA development would then be interesting, but that's actually a minor issue.
The point you make of them not not having made super carriers is less to do with capabilities and more to do with doctrine. With them learning modern techniques from the french this will only improve.
I didn't said that it's an issue that they haven't made a super carrier, but the expertice they had in the Soviet area is not available anymore, which is obvious by the problems they had with the Gorshkov, or even with the Mistral class. They still might be good for smaller vessels and subs, but for a carrier development, I don't see them as a useful partner at the moment and by the preference of IN for western partners in their carrier developments, that is very unlikely anyway. After the Gorshkov disaster, IN can't afford to get into another disaster with the Russians again.