@Armstrong
Dude, the problem here is, we are looking at the argument from two different angles. You are looking at it in the philosophical speculative sense, and I'm looking at it in the realistic worldly sense. So let's slow it down a bit until I've read half as much philosophy as yourself(not read one book to date) and then perhaps I can entertain such discussion, but as you already know, it will still be speculative, and frankly, pointless as no definitive position can ever be constituted.
But I'm curious as to the "we cannot define X phenomena, therefore God is required"(if that's your position), then why the God you have chosen?
Dude, the problem here is, we are looking at the argument from two different angles. You are looking at it in the philosophical speculative sense, and I'm looking at it in the realistic worldly sense. So let's slow it down a bit until I've read half as much philosophy as yourself(not read one book to date) and then perhaps I can entertain such discussion, but as you already know, it will still be speculative, and frankly, pointless as no definitive position can ever be constituted.
But I'm curious as to the "we cannot define X phenomena, therefore God is required"(if that's your position), then why the God you have chosen?
Last edited by a moderator: